Suppr超能文献

优化诊断 RT-PCR 方案和采样程序,以可靠且具有成本效益的方式检测木薯棕色条斑病毒。

Optimization of diagnostic RT-PCR protocols and sampling procedures for the reliable and cost-effective detection of Cassava brown streak virus.

机构信息

Natural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich, Chatham Maritime, Kent ME4 4TB, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Virol Methods. 2010 Feb;163(2):353-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2009.10.023. Epub 2009 Oct 29.

Abstract

Sampling procedures and diagnostic protocols were optimized for accurate diagnosis of Cassava brown streak virus (CBSV) (genus Ipomovirus, family Potyviridae). A cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) method was optimized for sample preparation from infected cassava plants and compared with the RNeasy plant mini kit (Qiagen) for sensitivity, reproducibility and costs. CBSV was detectable readily in total RNAs extracted using either method. The major difference between the two methods was in the cost of consumables, with the CTAB 10x cheaper (0.53 pounds sterling=US$0.80 per sample) than the RNeasy method (5.91 pounds sterling=US$8.86 per sample). A two-step RT-PCR (1.34 pounds sterling=US$2.01 per sample), although less sensitive, was at least 3-times cheaper than a one-step RT-PCR (4.48 pounds sterling=US$6.72). The two RT-PCR tests revealed consistently the presence of CBSV both in symptomatic and asymptomatic leaves and indicated that asymptomatic leaves can be used reliably for virus diagnosis. Depending on the accuracy required, sampling 100-400 plants per field is an appropriate recommendation for CBSD diagnosis, giving a 99.9% probability of detecting a disease incidence of 6.7-1.7%, respectively. CBSV was detected at 10(-4)-fold dilutions in composite sampling, indicating that the most efficient way to index many samples for CBSV will be to screen pooled samples. The diagnostic protocols described below are reliable and the most cost-effective methods available currently for detecting CBSV.

摘要

采样程序和诊断方案经过优化,可准确诊断木薯棕色条纹病毒(CBSV)(属 Ipomovirus,科为 Potyviridae)。优化了十六烷基三甲基溴化铵(CTAB)法用于从感染的木薯植物中制备样品,并与 RNeasy 植物迷你试剂盒(Qiagen)比较了其灵敏度、重现性和成本。使用这两种方法都可以轻松检测到总 RNA 中的 CBSV。这两种方法的主要区别在于耗材的成本,CTAB 比 RNeasy 方法便宜 10 倍(每份样品 0.53 英镑=0.80 美元)(每份样品 5.91 英镑=8.86 美元)。两步 RT-PCR(每份样品 1.34 英镑=2.01 美元)虽然灵敏度较低,但至少比一步 RT-PCR 便宜 3 倍(每份样品 4.48 英镑=6.72 美元)。两种 RT-PCR 测试均一致显示出症状和无症状叶片中 CBSV 的存在,并表明无症状叶片可可靠用于病毒诊断。根据所需的准确性,对每个田间 100-400 株植物进行采样是 CBSD 诊断的适当建议,分别以 99.9%的概率检测到 6.7-1.7%的疾病发生率。在复合采样中,CBSV 可检测到 10(-4)倍稀释,表明对许多样本进行 CBSV 索引的最有效方法将是筛选混合样本。下面描述的诊断方案可靠且是目前检测 CBSV 最具成本效益的方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验