• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对恢复精神能力的精神科住院患者的回顾性观察。

Retrospective views of psychiatric in-patients regaining mental capacity.

作者信息

Owen Gareth S, David Anthony S, Hayward Peter, Richardson Genevra, Szmukler George, Hotopf Matthew

机构信息

Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Weston Education Centre, Cutcombe Road, London SE5 9RS, UK.

出版信息

Br J Psychiatry. 2009 Nov;195(5):403-7. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.109.065151.

DOI:10.1192/bjp.bp.109.065151
PMID:19880929
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2806572/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

An individual's right to self-determination in treatment decisions is a central principle of modern medical ethics and law, and is upheld except under conditions of mental incapacity. When doctors, particularly psychiatrists, override the treatment wishes of individuals, they risk conflicting with this principle. Few data are available on the views of people regaining capacity who had their treatment wishes overridden.

AIMS

To investigate individuals' views on treatment decisions after they had regained capacity.

METHOD

One hundred and fifteen people who lacked capacity to make treatment decisions were recruited from a sample of consecutively admitted patients to a large psychiatric hospital. After 1 month of treatment we asked the individuals for their views on the surrogate treatment decisions they received.

RESULTS

Eighty-three per cent (95% CI 66-93) of people who regained capacity gave retrospective approval. Approval was no different between those admitted informally or involuntarily using Mental Health Act powers (chi(2) = 1.52, P = 0.47). Individuals were more likely to give retrospective approval if they regained capacity (chi(2) = 14.2, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Most people who regain capacity following psychiatric treatment indicate retrospective approval. This is the case even if initial treatment wishes are overridden. These findings moderate concerns both about surrogate decision-making by psychiatrists and advance decision-making by people with mental illness.

摘要

背景

个人在治疗决策中的自主决定权是现代医学伦理和法律的核心原则,除非在无行为能力的情况下,该权利会得到维护。当医生,尤其是精神科医生无视个人的治疗意愿时,他们可能会与这一原则产生冲突。关于那些治疗意愿被无视后恢复行为能力者的观点,现有数据很少。

目的

调查个人恢复行为能力后对治疗决策的看法。

方法

从一家大型精神病院连续收治的患者样本中招募了115名无能力做出治疗决策的人。在治疗1个月后,我们询问这些人对他们所接受的替代治疗决策的看法。

结果

恢复行为能力的人中有83%(95%可信区间66 - 93)给予了追溯认可。通过《精神健康法》权力非自愿入院者和非正式入院者之间的认可情况没有差异(卡方检验χ(2)=1.52,P = 0.47)。如果恢复行为能力,个人更有可能给予追溯认可(卡方检验χ(2)=14.2,P = 0.001)。

结论

大多数接受精神科治疗后恢复行为能力的人表示给予追溯认可。即使最初的治疗意愿被无视,情况依然如此。这些发现减轻了对精神科医生替代决策以及精神疾病患者预先决策的担忧。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2570/2806572/fd0cc175e04f/404f1g.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2570/2806572/fd0cc175e04f/404f1g.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2570/2806572/fd0cc175e04f/404f1g.jpg

相似文献

1
Retrospective views of psychiatric in-patients regaining mental capacity.对恢复精神能力的精神科住院患者的回顾性观察。
Br J Psychiatry. 2009 Nov;195(5):403-7. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.109.065151.
2
Respecting the autonomy of chronic mentally ill women in decisions about contraception.尊重患有慢性精神疾病的女性在避孕决策方面的自主权。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1993 Jul;44(7):671-4. doi: 10.1176/ps.44.7.671.
3
Treatment decision-making capacity in non-consensual psychiatric treatment: a multicentre study.非自愿性精神科治疗中的治疗决策能力:一项多中心研究。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2018 Oct;27(5):492-499. doi: 10.1017/S2045796017000063. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
4
Mental capacity to make decisions on treatment in people admitted to psychiatric hospitals: cross sectional study.精神病医院住院患者做出治疗决策的心理能力:横断面研究
BMJ. 2008 Jun 30;337(7660):a448. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39580.546597.BE.
5
Regaining mental capacity for treatment decisions following psychiatric admission: a clinico-ethical study.精神科住院后恢复治疗决策能力:临床伦理研究。
Psychol Med. 2011 Jan;41(1):119-28. doi: 10.1017/S0033291710000383. Epub 2010 Mar 29.
6
Capacity to consent to treatment in psychiatry inpatients - a systematic review.精神科住院患者同意治疗的能力——一项系统综述
Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2022 Sep;26(3):303-315. doi: 10.1080/13651501.2021.2017461. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
7
Prevalence and predictors of mental incapacity in psychiatric in-patients.精神科住院患者精神能力丧失的患病率及预测因素
Br J Psychiatry. 2005 Oct;187:379-85. doi: 10.1192/bjp.187.4.379.
8
[The imminent peril in the law of July the fifth 2011, two years later: the impact on health?].[2011年7月5日法律中的紧迫危险,两年后:对健康的影响?]
Encephale. 2014 Dec;40(6):468-73. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2014.01.001. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
9
Decisions to limit life-sustaining treatment for critically ill patients who lack both decision-making capacity and surrogate decision-makers.针对既无决策能力又无替代决策者的重症患者做出的限制维持生命治疗的决定。
Crit Care Med. 2006 Aug;34(8):2053-9. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000227654.38708.C1.
10
A meta-review of literature reviews assessing the capacity of patients with severe mental disorders to make decisions about their healthcare.一篇文献综述的元分析评估了严重精神障碍患者在医疗保健方面做出决策的能力。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 30;20(1):339. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02756-0.

引用本文的文献

1
The Tangle of Autonomy, Beneficence, Liberty, and Consent in the CESS Debate.CESS辩论中自主性、行善原则、自由和同意的纠结
Perspect Behav Sci. 2023 Jun 6;46(2):321-328. doi: 10.1007/s40614-023-00378-x. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Accelerating the development of a psychological intervention to restore treatment decision-making capacity in patients with schizophrenia-spectrum disorder: a study protocol for a multi-site, assessor-blinded, pilot Umbrella trial (the DEC:IDES trial).加速开发一种心理干预措施以恢复精神分裂症谱系障碍患者的治疗决策能力:一项多中心、评估者盲法的先导伞式试验(DEC:IDES试验)的研究方案
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2023 Jul 8;9(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s40814-023-01323-0.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Mental capacity and psychiatric in-patients: implications for the new mental health law in England and Wales.精神能力与精神科住院患者:对英格兰和威尔士新精神健康法的影响
Br J Psychiatry. 2009 Sep;195(3):257-63. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.059782.
2
Patients' views and readmissions 1 year after involuntary hospitalisation.非自愿住院1年后患者的观点和再入院情况
Br J Psychiatry. 2009 Jan;194(1):49-54. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.052266.
3
Mental capacity, diagnosis and insight in psychiatric in-patients: a cross-sectional study.精神科住院患者的心理能力、诊断与洞察力:一项横断面研究。
Reasons for endorsing or rejecting self-binding directives in bipolar disorder: a qualitative study of survey responses from UK service users.
支持或反对双相情感障碍患者自我约束指令的原因:来自英国服务使用者调查回应的定性研究。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 Jul;8(7):599-609. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00115-2. Epub 2021 May 21.
4
Perceived protectiveness of research safeguards and influences on willingness to participate in research: A novel MTurk pilot study.研究保障措施的感知保护作用及其对参与研究意愿的影响:一项新型的 MTurk 初步研究。
J Psychiatr Res. 2021 Jun;138:200-206. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.04.005. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
5
Equality in the Informed Consent Process: Competence to Consent, Substitute Decision-Making, and Discrimination of Persons with Mental Disorders.知情同意过程中的平等:同意能力、替代决策制定以及精神障碍患者的歧视。
J Med Philos. 2021 Jan 25;46(1):108-136. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhaa030.
6
A tool to evaluate proportionality and necessity in the use of restrictive practices in forensic mental health settings: the DRILL tool (Dundrum restriction, intrusion and liberty ladders).一种评估法医精神卫生机构中限制措施使用的相称性和必要性的工具:DRILL 工具(邓德拉姆限制、侵入和自由阶梯)。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Oct 23;20(1):515. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02912-6.
7
The capacity of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder individuals to make autonomous decisions about pharmacological treatments for their illness in real life: A scoping review.精神分裂症和双相情感障碍患者在现实生活中对其疾病药物治疗做出自主决策的能力:一项范围综述。
Health Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 9;3(3):e179. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.179. eCollection 2020 Sep.
8
A meta-review of literature reviews assessing the capacity of patients with severe mental disorders to make decisions about their healthcare.一篇文献综述的元分析评估了严重精神障碍患者在医疗保健方面做出决策的能力。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 30;20(1):339. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02756-0.
9
Legal capacity, mental capacity and supported decision-making: Report from a panel event.法律能力、心理能力和支持决策:小组活动报告。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2019 Jan-Feb;62:160-168. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2018.09.006. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
10
Adverse consequences of article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities for persons with mental disabilities and an alternative way forward.《联合国残疾人权利公约》第十二条对精神残疾人的不良后果及可供选择的前进道路
J Med Ethics. 2018 Apr;44(4):226-233. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104414. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
Psychol Med. 2009 Aug;39(8):1389-98. doi: 10.1017/S0033291708004637. Epub 2008 Oct 22.
4
Mental capacity to make decisions on treatment in people admitted to psychiatric hospitals: cross sectional study.精神病医院住院患者做出治疗决策的心理能力:横断面研究
BMJ. 2008 Jun 30;337(7660):a448. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39580.546597.BE.
5
Clinical practice. Assessment of patients' competence to consent to treatment.临床实践。评估患者对治疗的同意能力。
N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 1;357(18):1834-40. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp074045.
6
Mental capacity in psychiatric patients: Systematic review.精神病患者的心理能力:系统评价。
Br J Psychiatry. 2007 Oct;191:291-7. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.106.035162.
7
Reliability of mental capacity assessments in psychiatric in-patients.精神科住院患者心理能力评估的可靠性
Br J Psychiatry. 2005 Oct;187:372-8. doi: 10.1192/bjp.187.4.372.
8
Prevalence of mental incapacity in medical inpatients and associated risk factors: cross-sectional study.住院患者精神能力障碍的患病率及相关危险因素:横断面研究
Lancet. 2004;364(9443):1421-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17224-3.
9
Effect of joint crisis plans on use of compulsory treatment in psychiatry: single blind randomised controlled trial.联合危机计划对精神科强制治疗使用情况的影响:单盲随机对照试验
BMJ. 2004 Jul 17;329(7458):136. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38155.585046.63. Epub 2004 Jul 7.
10
Patients' revisions of their beliefs about the need for hospitalization.患者对住院必要性信念的修正。
Am J Psychiatry. 1999 Sep;156(9):1385-91. doi: 10.1176/ajp.156.9.1385.