Furmark Tomas, Carlbring Per, Hedman Erik, Sonnenstein Annika, Clevberger Peder, Bohman Benjamin, Eriksson Anneli, Hållén Agneta, Frykman Mandus, Holmström Annelie, Sparthan Elisabeth, Tillfors Maria, Ihrfelt Elisabeth Nilsson, Spak Maria, Eriksson Anna, Ekselius Lisa, Andersson Gerhard
Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Box 1225, SE-751 42 Uppsala, Sweden.
Br J Psychiatry. 2009 Nov;195(5):440-7. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.060996.
Internet-delivered self-help programmes with added therapist guidance have shown efficacy in social anxiety disorder, but unguided self-help has been insufficiently studied.
To evaluate the efficacy of guided and unguided self-help for social anxiety disorder.
Participants followed a cognitive-behavioural self-help programme in the form of either pure bibliotherapy or an internet-based treatment with therapist guidance and online group discussions. A subsequent trial was conducted to evaluate treatment specificity. Participants (n = 235) were randomised to one of three conditions in the first trial, or one of four conditions in the second.
Pure bibliotherapy and the internet-based treatment were better than waiting list on measures of social anxiety, general anxiety, depression and quality of life. The internet-based therapy had the highest effect sizes, but directly comparable effects were noted for bibliotherapy augmented with online group discussions. Gains were well maintained a year later.
Unguided self-help through bibliotherapy can produce enduring improvement for individuals with social anxiety disorder.
有治疗师指导的互联网自助项目已被证明对社交焦虑症有效,但无指导的自助疗法尚未得到充分研究。
评估有指导和无指导的自助疗法对社交焦虑症的疗效。
参与者采用认知行为自助项目,形式为单纯的阅读疗法或有治疗师指导及在线小组讨论的基于互联网的治疗。随后进行了一项试验以评估治疗特异性。在第一次试验中,参与者(n = 235)被随机分配到三种条件之一,在第二次试验中被随机分配到四种条件之一。
在社交焦虑、一般焦虑、抑郁和生活质量测量方面,单纯阅读疗法和基于互联网的治疗均优于等待名单组。基于互联网的疗法效果量最高,但在阅读疗法基础上增加在线小组讨论的效果与之相当。一年后疗效得到很好维持。
通过阅读疗法进行的无指导自助可以使社交焦虑症患者获得持久改善。