Khan Zareen Abbas, Heggelund Jørn, Lydersen Stian, Kidholm Kristian, Pedersen Henrik, Janszky Imre, Nordgreen Tine, Halsteinli Vidar
Research and Development Unit, Department of Mental Health Care, St Olav's University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jul 28;27:e73067. doi: 10.2196/73067.
Therapist-guided internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (iCBT) has demonstrated efficacy and potential cost-effectiveness in treating depression, anxiety, and panic disorder in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, evidence of its outcomes and costs in routine care settings on a national level remains limited.
We aimed to assess the program costs and outcomes of therapist-guided iCBT for depression, social anxiety, and panic disorder posttreatment (T2) and at 6-month follow-up (T3) in a broad context, in addition to exploring how the program's costs and effects vary by hospital.
This single-arm observational study analyzed patient-reported data collected from routine care between 2021 and 2024 in 4 hospitals in Norway. The symptom severity of depression, social anxiety, and panic disorder was measured using the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), the Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN), and the Panic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS), respectively. Generic health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was measured with the EQ-5D-5L, while work and social functioning were measured with the Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) and sick leave days. Mixed effects models estimated changes in outcomes over time and between hospitals. Hospital-specific annual program costs per patient were estimated based on infrastructure and therapist guidance expenses. The economic evaluation was performed with a hospital perspective and extended to a societal perspective by examining sick leave days.
Data from 565 participants showed substantial improvements across all outcomes at T2 and T3. At T2, 102 (35.1%) participants responded positively to treatment (depression: 44/140, 31.4%; social anxiety: 21/79, 26.6%; panic disorder: 37/72, 51.4%), and 66 (23.7%) achieved remission (depression: 17/139, 12.2%; social anxiety: 26/73, 35.6%; panic disorder: 23/67, 34.3%). Regarding work and social functioning, 97 (33.0%) patients responded positively to the treatment and 60 (23.0%) achieved remission, as measured by the WSAS. Patients reported a mean reduction of 3.2 sick leave days (95% CI -5.4 to -0.9) at T2 and 7.7 sick leave days (95% CI -11.5 to -3.9) at T3. EQ-5D-5L utility scores increased by a mean of 0.11 (95% CI 0.08-0.13) at T2 and 0.12 (95% CI 0.09-0.15) at T3. Patient-reported outcomes were consistent across time points and hospitals and robust to sensitivity analyses accounting for patient and hospital characteristics and missing data scenarios. The mean total program costs per patient were US $1030.12 (SD 451.6), which varied by location (US $636.41-$2152.47), mostly due to differences in patient volume.
This study confirms the potential of therapist-guided iCBT to relieve symptom severity and improve well-being across different health service providers when implemented as part of routine specialist health care. The observed variance in costs per patient between hospitals underscores the importance of patient volume to optimize efficient use of resources.
在随机对照试验(RCT)中,治疗师指导的互联网认知行为疗法(iCBT)已证明在治疗抑郁症、焦虑症和恐慌症方面具有疗效和潜在的成本效益。然而,在全国范围内的常规护理环境中,其结果和成本的证据仍然有限。
我们旨在评估治疗师指导的iCBT治疗抑郁症、社交焦虑症和恐慌症在治疗后(T2)和6个月随访(T3)时的项目成本和结果,此外还探讨该项目的成本和效果如何因医院而异。
这项单臂观察性研究分析了2021年至2024年期间在挪威4家医院的常规护理中收集的患者报告数据。分别使用9项患者健康问卷(PHQ-9)、社交恐惧症量表(SPIN)和恐慌症严重程度量表(PDSS)测量抑郁症、社交焦虑症和恐慌症的症状严重程度。使用EQ-5D-5L测量一般健康相关生活质量(HRQoL),而使用工作和社会调整量表(WSAS)和病假天数测量工作和社会功能。混合效应模型估计了不同时间和不同医院之间结果的变化。根据基础设施和治疗师指导费用估计每位患者的医院特定年度项目成本。经济评估从医院角度进行,并通过检查病假天数扩展到社会角度。
565名参与者的数据显示,在T2和T3时所有结果都有显著改善。在T2时,102名(35.1%)参与者对治疗反应良好(抑郁症:44/140,31.4%;社交焦虑症:21/79,26.6%;恐慌症:37/72,51.4%),66名(23.7%)实现缓解(抑郁症:17/139,12.2%;社交焦虑症:26/73,35.6%;恐慌症:23/67,34.3%)。关于工作和社会功能,97名(33.0%)患者对治疗反应良好,60名(23.0%)实现缓解,这是根据WSAS测量的。患者报告在T2时平均病假天数减少3.2天(95%CI -5.4至-0.9),在T3时减少7.7天(95%CI -11.5至-3.9)。EQ-5D-5L效用得分在T2时平均增加0.11(95%CI)0.08 - 0.13),在T3时增加0.12(95%CI 0.09 - 0.15)。患者报告的结果在不同时间点和医院之间是一致的,并且对考虑患者和医院特征以及缺失数据情况的敏感性分析具有稳健性。每位患者的平均项目总成本为1030.12美元(标准差451.6),因地点而异(636.41美元至2152.47美元),主要是由于患者数量的差异。
本研究证实了治疗师指导的iCBT作为常规专科医疗保健的一部分实施时,在不同医疗服务提供者中缓解症状严重程度和改善幸福感的潜力。各医院间观察到的每位患者成本差异强调了患者数量对优化资源有效利用的重要性。