Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology and Education, Faculty of Engineering, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology and Education, Faculty of Engineering, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 9;14(11):e086728. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086728.
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the available evidence on efficacy of social support strategies, as defined by the persuasive system design framework, in internet-based and mobile-based interventions (IMI) targeting mental health.
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials.
Randomised controlled trials comparing IMI implementing a social support strategy for mental health symptoms to various control conditions. Publications up to June 2023 (date of search 6 June 2023) were considered.
Two independent reviewers screened and extracted data in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed with the Risk of Bias Tool V.2.0. Data were pooled based on a random-effects model.
After screening 6484 records, a total of 45 studies met our inclusion criteria. At 96%, social support was predominantly implemented through the strategy of social facilitation, by which users recognising others using the intervention (eg, discussion forum). IMI implementing social support strategies showed moderate effect sizes of Hedges' =-0.34 (95% CI -0.47 to -0.21, p<0.001) in comparison to different control conditions. Heterogeneity was considerable (I=73.6%; 95% CI 64.8 to 80.3). Subgroup analyses revealed a significant influence of targeted psychological condition (p<0.001), type of social support (p<0.001) and control condition (p<0.001). In =11 component studies (ie, comparison to a disentangled version of the same intervention), IMI with social support strategies were not significantly more effective in comparison to the same IMI without social support (Hedges' =-0.08 (95% CI -0.22 to 0.05, p=0.19, I=0%). 64% (k=7) of component studies reported higher adherence rates in IMI with social support.
Based on a small number of component studies, implementing social support strategies in IMI that target mental health symptoms has no significant incremental benefit on effectiveness. To draw more robust conclusions, the potential of other social support strategies besides social facilitation should be exploited in future component studies.
CRD42020222810.
本系统评价和荟萃分析评估了基于劝导系统设计框架定义的社会支持策略在针对心理健康的基于互联网和移动的干预措施(IMI)中的有效性的现有证据。
系统评价和荟萃分析。
PubMed、Embase、PsycINFO 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库。
随机对照试验比较了实施社会支持策略以治疗心理健康症状的 IMI 与各种对照条件。考虑了截至 2023 年 6 月的出版物(搜索日期为 2023 年 6 月 6 日)。
两名独立评审员根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南筛选和提取数据。使用风险偏倚工具 V.2.0 评估风险偏倚。根据随机效应模型汇总数据。
在筛选了 6484 条记录后,共有 45 项研究符合纳入标准。社会支持的实施主要通过社会促进策略进行,即用户识别使用干预措施的其他人(例如,讨论论坛)。与不同的对照条件相比,实施社会支持策略的 IMI 的 Hedges' =-0.34(95%CI -0.47 至 -0.21,p<0.001)的效应大小中等。异质性很大(I=73.6%;95%CI 64.8%至 80.3%)。亚组分析表明,目标心理状况(p<0.001)、社会支持类型(p<0.001)和对照条件(p<0.001)有显著影响。在 11 项组成研究中(即,与相同干预措施的分解版本相比),与没有社会支持的相同 IMI 相比,具有社会支持策略的 IMI 并没有显著更有效(Hedges' =-0.08(95%CI -0.22 至 0.05,p=0.19,I=0%))。64%(k=7)的组成研究报告称,具有社会支持的 IMI 的依从率更高。
基于少数组成研究,在针对心理健康症状的 IMI 中实施社会支持策略对疗效没有显著的附加益处。为了得出更可靠的结论,未来的组成研究应该利用除社会促进以外的其他社会支持策略。
PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42020222810。