Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, 301 Wilson Hall, 111 21st Avenue South, Nashville, TN 37203, USA.
Psychol Bull. 2009 Nov;135(6):974-99. doi: 10.1037/a0017428.
There has been significant interest in the role of anxiety sensitivity (AS) in the anxiety disorders. In this meta-analysis, we empirically evaluate differences in AS between anxiety disorders, mood disorders, and nonclinical controls. A total of 38 published studies (N = 20,146) were included in the analysis. The results yielded a large effect size indicating greater AS among anxiety disorder patients versus nonclinical controls (d = 1.61). However, this effect was maintained only for panic disorder patients compared to mood disorder patients (d = 0.85). Panic disorder was also associated with greater AS compared to other anxiety disorders except for posttraumatic stress disorder (d = 0.04). Otherwise the anxiety disorders generally did not differ from each other in AS. Although these findings suggest that AS is central to the phenomenology of panic disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder, causal inferences regarding the role of AS in these anxiety disorders cannot be made. Moderator analyses showed that a greater proportion of female participants was associated with larger differences in AS between anxiety and nonclinical control groups. However, more female participants were associated with a smaller AS difference between anxiety and mood disorder groups. This finding suggests that AS is less robust in distinguishing anxiety from mood disorders among women. Age also moderated some observed effects such that AS was more strongly associated with anxiety disorders in adults compared to children. Type of AS measure used also moderated some effects. Implications of these findings for the conceptualization of AS in anxiety-related disorders are discussed.
焦虑敏感(AS)在焦虑障碍中的作用引起了广泛关注。在这项荟萃分析中,我们实证评估了 AS 在焦虑障碍、心境障碍和非临床对照组之间的差异。共纳入 38 项已发表的研究(N = 20,146)进行分析。结果表明,与非临床对照组相比,焦虑障碍患者的 AS 存在较大的效应量(d = 1.61)。然而,这种效应仅在惊恐障碍患者与心境障碍患者之间得到维持(d = 0.85)。与其他焦虑障碍相比,惊恐障碍患者的 AS 也更高,除了创伤后应激障碍(d = 0.04)。否则,这些焦虑障碍在 AS 方面通常没有差异。尽管这些发现表明 AS 是惊恐障碍和创伤后应激障碍现象学的核心,但不能对 AS 在这些焦虑障碍中的作用做出因果推断。调节分析表明,更多的女性参与者与焦虑和非临床对照组之间的 AS 差异更大有关。然而,更多的女性参与者与焦虑和心境障碍组之间的 AS 差异较小有关。这一发现表明,AS 在女性中区分焦虑和心境障碍的能力较弱。年龄也调节了一些观察到的效应,即与儿童相比,AS 与成人的焦虑障碍相关性更强。AS 测量类型也调节了一些效应。这些发现对焦虑相关障碍中 AS 的概念化具有启示意义。