• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜治疗复杂性与非复杂性急性阑尾炎的疗效:一项前瞻性比较试验。

Outcomes after laparoscopic treatment of complicated versus uncomplicated acute appendicitis: a prospective, comparative trial.

作者信息

Malagon Antonio M, Arteaga-Gonzalez Ivan, Rodriguez-Ballester Lucrecia

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, La Laguna, Canary Islands, Spain.

出版信息

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009 Dec;19(6):721-5. doi: 10.1089/lap.2009.0167.

DOI:10.1089/lap.2009.0167
PMID:19895233
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic treatment of simple acute appendicitis (AA) is a safe procedure; however, there are doubts about its safety in cases of complicated AA. The aim of this study was to determine the differences in results of laparoscopic treatment between cases of complicated versus simple AA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We prospectively included all patients treated for suspected AA by two surgeons of our service between May 2002 and May 2007. Of 221 patients, 20 were excluded from the study because the laparoscopic approach was not possible; 116 of 201 had uncomplicated AA, 57 complicated AA, 12 gynecologic ethiology, 11 negative appendectomy, and 5 other causes; patients without acute appendicitis were also excluded from the study. In all cases, laparoscopy was the first treatment option. The following variables were considered: mean surgical time, reconversions, emergency readmissions, emergency reinterventions or invasive procedures, mean postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative complications (i.e., infectious or noninfectious).

RESULTS

Our results showed statistically significantly worse results, in terms of surgical time, postoperative stay, reconversions, and infectious complications, for patients with complicated versus uncomplicated AA; however, no differences were observed regarding noninfectious complications, emergency readmissions, and emergency reinterventions or invasive procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

We consider that laparoscopic treatment of complicated AA may be safely used, despite worse results than in cases of simple AA, since the differences in numbers of severe postoperative complications requiring emergency readmission, reintervention, or invasive procedures were not statistically significant.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜治疗单纯性急性阑尾炎(AA)是一种安全的手术方法;然而,对于复杂性AA病例,其安全性存在疑问。本研究的目的是确定复杂性AA与单纯性AA病例在腹腔镜治疗结果上的差异。

材料与方法

我们前瞻性纳入了2002年5月至2007年5月期间由我们科室的两位外科医生治疗的所有疑似AA患者。在221例患者中,20例因无法采用腹腔镜手术而被排除在研究之外;201例患者中,116例为非复杂性AA,57例为复杂性AA,12例为妇科病因,11例为阴性阑尾切除术,5例为其他原因;无急性阑尾炎的患者也被排除在研究之外。在所有病例中,腹腔镜检查是首选治疗方法。考虑了以下变量:平均手术时间、再次手术、急诊再入院、急诊再次干预或侵入性操作、平均术后住院时间以及术后并发症(即感染性或非感染性)。

结果

我们的结果显示,在手术时间、术后住院时间、再次手术和感染性并发症方面,复杂性AA患者的结果在统计学上明显比非复杂性AA患者差;然而,在非感染性并发症、急诊再入院以及急诊再次干预或侵入性操作方面未观察到差异。

结论

我们认为,尽管结果比单纯性AA病例差,但腹腔镜治疗复杂性AA仍可安全使用,因为需要急诊再入院、再次干预或侵入性操作的严重术后并发症数量差异无统计学意义。

相似文献

1
Outcomes after laparoscopic treatment of complicated versus uncomplicated acute appendicitis: a prospective, comparative trial.腹腔镜治疗复杂性与非复杂性急性阑尾炎的疗效:一项前瞻性比较试验。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009 Dec;19(6):721-5. doi: 10.1089/lap.2009.0167.
2
Risk factors for serious morbidity, prolonged length of stay and hospital readmission after laparoscopic appendectomy - results from Pol-LA (Polish Laparoscopic Appendectomy) multicenter large cohort study.腹腔镜阑尾切除术(Pol-LA)多中心大样本队列研究:术后严重并发症、住院时间延长和再次住院的风险因素。
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 15;9(1):14793. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51172-2.
3
Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic and open appendectomy in management of uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗单纯性和复杂性阑尾炎的疗效比较。
Ann Surg. 2011 Dec;254(6):927-32. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31822aa8ea.
4
Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated acute appendicitis does not result in increased surgical complications.腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗复杂急性阑尾炎不会增加手术并发症。
Asian J Surg. 2012 Jul;35(3):113-6. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2012.04.014. Epub 2012 May 29.
5
Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: an evaluation of postoperative factors.复杂性阑尾炎的腹腔镜阑尾切除术:术后因素评估
Surg Endosc. 2004 Jun;18(6):969-73. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8262-2. Epub 2004 Apr 21.
6
Complicated appendicitis--is the laparoscopic approach appropriate? A comparative study with the open approach: outcome in a community hospital setting.复杂性阑尾炎——腹腔镜手术方法是否合适?与开放手术方法的比较研究:社区医院环境下的结果
Am Surg. 2007 Aug;73(8):737-41; discussion 741-2.
7
Complicated appendicitis in children: is laparoscopic appendectomy appropriate? A comparative study with the open appendectomy--our experience.儿童复杂性阑尾炎:腹腔镜阑尾切除术是否合适?与开腹阑尾切除术的比较研究——我们的经验。
J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Oct;44(10):1924-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.03.037.
8
Comparison of open and laparoscopic appendectomy in uncomplicated appendicitis: a prospective randomized clinical trial.单纯性阑尾炎开放手术与腹腔镜阑尾切除术的比较:一项前瞻性随机临床试验。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2013 May;19(3):200-4. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2013.58234.
9
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Jul;205(1):60-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.03.017.
10
Laparoscopic appendicectomy for complicated appendicitis: is it safe and justified?: A retrospective analysis.腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎:是否安全且合理?一项回顾性分析。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2011 Jun;21(3):142-5. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31821ad770.

引用本文的文献

1
Demographic and Clinical Characteristics Associated With the Failure of Nonoperative Management of Uncomplicated Appendicitis in Children: Secondary Analysis of a Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.与儿童单纯性阑尾炎非手术治疗失败相关的人口统计学和临床特征:一项非随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 May 2;5(5):e229712. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.9712.
2
Risk factors for serious morbidity, prolonged length of stay and hospital readmission after laparoscopic appendectomy - results from Pol-LA (Polish Laparoscopic Appendectomy) multicenter large cohort study.腹腔镜阑尾切除术(Pol-LA)多中心大样本队列研究:术后严重并发症、住院时间延长和再次住院的风险因素。
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 15;9(1):14793. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51172-2.
3
Multi-institutional trial of non-operative management and surgery for uncomplicated appendicitis in children: Design and rationale.多机构合作研究儿童单纯性阑尾炎非手术治疗与手术治疗的比较:设计与原理。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2019 Aug;83:10-17. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.06.013. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
4
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in pediatric patients with complicated appendicitis: a meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗小儿复杂性阑尾炎的Meta 分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Dec;33(12):4066-4077. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06709-x. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
5
Early laparoscopic management of appendicular mass in children: Still a taboo, or time for a change in surgical philosophy?儿童阑尾周围脓肿的早期腹腔镜治疗:仍是禁忌,还是手术理念变革之时?
J Minim Access Surg. 2016 Apr-Jun;12(2):98-101. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.178518.
6
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for complicated appendicitis in adults: a randomized controlled trial.成人复杂性阑尾炎的腹腔镜手术与开放手术:一项随机对照试验
Surg Endosc. 2016 May;30(5):1705-12. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4453-x. Epub 2015 Aug 15.
7
Metal endoclips for the closure of the appendiceal stump in laparoscopic appendectomy.金属夹用于腹腔镜阑尾切除术中阑尾残端的闭合。
Tech Coloproctol. 2012 Apr;16(2):139-41. doi: 10.1007/s10151-011-0764-7. Epub 2011 Oct 5.