Suppr超能文献

乳头溢液细胞学检查和乳腺导管造影术在检测导管病变方面的诊断价值是什么?

What is the diagnostic value of nipple discharge cytology and galactography in detecting duct pathology?

作者信息

Carvalho M J, Dias M, Gonçalo M, Fernandes G, Rodrigues V, de Oliveira C F

机构信息

Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.

出版信息

Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2009;30(5):543-6.

Abstract

The present study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of nipple discharge (ND) cytology and galactography. Ninety-four patients submitted to duct excision, representing a total of 98 duct excisions, were retrospectively analyzed from January 1997 to May 2007. Histology of ducts excised revealed 35% duct ectasia (DE), 31% duct papilloma (DP), 20% potential malignant transforming lesions (PMTL), 6% breast cancer (BC), 1% adenoma and 6% normal breast tissue. Cytology had a sensibility and specificity in detecting duct pathology of, respectively, 40% and 61.3%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 53.8% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 47.5%. Concerning malignant and PMTL, cytology had a sensibility and specificity of, respectively, 46.2% and 62.3%, a PPV of 25% and a NPV of 82.5%. Breast cancer was never suggested by positive cytology. Galactography had a sensibility and specificity in detecting duct pathology of, respectively, 77.4% and 29.2%, a PPV of 58.5% and a NPV of 50%. For malignant and PMTL, galactography had a sensibility and specificity of, respectively, 80% and 26.7%, a PPV of 19.5% and a NPV of 85.7%. However, galactography never suggested a diagnosis of cancer. Cytology and galactography performed together in 49% showed a low Kappa Index (KI < 1), allowing us to conclude that cytology and galactography detect different pathologies. Cytology showed a poor performance in predicting histological diagnosis in face of ND. Galactography had a good sensibility in excluding malignant lesions and PMTL. Galactography was significantly more sensitive for duct pathology but cytology was more specific for malignant lesions and PMTL.

摘要

本研究旨在评估乳头溢液(ND)细胞学检查和乳腺导管造影的诊断价值。对1997年1月至2007年5月期间接受导管切除术的94例患者(共98次导管切除术)进行回顾性分析。切除导管的组织学检查显示,35%为导管扩张(DE),31%为导管乳头状瘤(DP),20%为潜在恶性转化病变(PMTL),6%为乳腺癌(BC),1%为腺瘤,6%为正常乳腺组织。细胞学检查在检测导管病变方面的敏感性和特异性分别为40%和61.3%,阳性预测值(PPV)为53.8%,阴性预测值(NPV)为47.5%。对于恶性病变和PMTL,细胞学检查的敏感性和特异性分别为46.2%和62.3%,PPV为25%,NPV为82.5%。阳性细胞学检查从未提示乳腺癌。乳腺导管造影在检测导管病变方面的敏感性和特异性分别为77.4%和29.2%,PPV为58.5%,NPV为50%。对于恶性病变和PMTL,乳腺导管造影的敏感性和特异性分别为80%和26.7%,PPV为19.5%,NPV为85.7%。然而,乳腺导管造影从未提示癌症诊断。49%同时进行细胞学检查和乳腺导管造影的结果显示卡帕指数较低(KI<1),这使我们得出结论,细胞学检查和乳腺导管造影检测的是不同的病变。面对乳头溢液,细胞学检查在预测组织学诊断方面表现不佳。乳腺导管造影在排除恶性病变和PMTL方面具有良好的敏感性。乳腺导管造影对导管病变的敏感性显著更高,但细胞学检查对恶性病变和PMTL更具特异性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验