• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在加拿大东部北极圈内的足月因纽特婴儿中,帕利珠单抗的成本效益。

The cost effectiveness of palivizumab in term Inuit infants in the Eastern Canadian Arctic.

机构信息

Medical Outcomes and Research in Economics Group, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Med Econ. 2009;12(4):361-70. doi: 10.3111/13696990903442155.

DOI:10.3111/13696990903442155
PMID:19900071
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Canadian, Inuit, full term infants have the highest rate of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection globally, which results in substantial costs associated hospitalisation.

METHODS

Decision-analytical techniques were used to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for palivizumab compared to no prophylaxis for Inuit infants of all gestational age. The time horizon was that of life-time follow-up, and costs and effectiveness were discounted at 5% per year. Costs (2007 CAD$) for palivizumab, hospitalisation (including medical evacuation, intensive care unit [ICU]), physician visits, and transportation were calculated based on the Canadian payer's perspective. Benefits on decreasing RSV hospitalisation were expressed as quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) were conducted, varying: mortality rates, utilities, length of stay in hospital and ICU.

RESULTS

For all of Baffin Island infants (<1 year), the ICER was $39,435/QALY. However, when infants were grouped by age and area of residence, those residing in Iqaluit (<1 year) had an ICER of $152,145/QALY, while those residing in rural areas (outside of Iqaluit) had an ICER of $24,750/QALY. Prophylaxis was a dominant strategy (cost saving) for rural infants under 6 months of age, with the PSA demonstrating that it was dominant 98% of the time.

CONCLUSIONS

The ICERs suggested that palivizumab is a cost-effective option for the prevention of RSV for Inuit infants on Baffin Island compared to no prophylaxis. Palivizumab is highly cost effective in Arctic infants <1 year of age specifically residing outside of Iqaluit and is a dominant strategy for those under 6 months of age in rural areas. However, palivizumab is not cost effective compared to no treatment for infants of all ages residing in Iqaluit.

摘要

引言

加拿大因纽特人足月婴儿的呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)感染率居全球最高,这导致与住院相关的费用巨大。

方法

使用决策分析技术来估算帕利珠单抗与所有胎龄因纽特婴儿无预防措施相比的增量成本效益比(ICER)。时间范围是终生随访,成本和效果以每年 5%贴现。基于加拿大付款人的角度,计算了帕利珠单抗、住院(包括医疗后送、重症监护病房[ICU])、医生就诊和交通的成本(2007 加元)。减少 RSV 住院的益处表示为质量调整生命年(QALY)。进行了单因素和概率敏感性分析(PSA),变量包括:死亡率、效用、住院和 ICU 停留时间。

结果

对于巴芬岛所有婴儿(<1 岁),ICER 为 39,435 加元/QALY。然而,当按年龄和居住地分组时,居住在伊魁特(<1 岁)的婴儿的 ICER 为 152,145 加元/QALY,而居住在农村地区(伊魁特以外)的婴儿的 ICER 为 24,750 加元/QALY。预防措施对于 6 个月以下的农村婴儿是一种具有成本效益的策略(节省成本),PSA 表明该策略在 98%的情况下占主导地位。

结论

与无预防措施相比,帕利珠单抗对巴芬岛因纽特婴儿预防 RSV 的成本效益比表明,它是一种有效的选择。帕利珠单抗在<1 岁且特别居住在伊魁特以外的北极婴儿中具有高度成本效益,并且对于 6 个月以下的农村地区婴儿是一种占主导地位的策略。然而,对于所有年龄居住在伊魁特的婴儿,帕利珠单抗与无治疗相比并不具有成本效益。

相似文献

1
The cost effectiveness of palivizumab in term Inuit infants in the Eastern Canadian Arctic.在加拿大东部北极圈内的足月因纽特婴儿中,帕利珠单抗的成本效益。
J Med Econ. 2009;12(4):361-70. doi: 10.3111/13696990903442155.
2
Comparison of the cost of hospitalization for respiratory syncytial virus disease versus palivizumab prophylaxis in Canadian Inuit infants.加拿大因纽特族婴儿呼吸道合胞病毒疾病住院费用与帕利珠单抗预防费用的比较。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009 Aug;28(8):702-6. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e31819df78e.
3
The cost-effectiveness of palivizumab for respiratory syncytial virus prophylaxis in premature infants with a gestational age of 32-35 weeks: a Canadian-based analysis .帕利珠单抗预防胎龄 32-35 周早产儿呼吸道合胞病毒感染的成本效果分析:基于加拿大的研究
Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 Nov;24(11):3223-37. doi: 10.1185/03007990802484234. Epub 2008 Oct 16.
4
Cost effectiveness of palivizumab for respiratory syncytial virus prophylaxis in high-risk children: a UK analysis.帕利珠单抗用于高危儿童预防呼吸道合胞病毒感染的成本效益:一项英国的分析。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2007;25(1):55-71. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200725010-00006.
5
Immunoprophylaxis against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) with palivizumab in children: a systematic review and economic evaluation.使用帕利珠单抗对儿童进行呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)免疫预防:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Dec;12(36):iii, ix-x, 1-86. doi: 10.3310/hta12360.
6
Cost effectiveness of palivizumab in Spain: an analysis using observational data.帕利珠单抗在西班牙的成本效益:基于观察性数据的分析。
Eur J Health Econ. 2010 Feb;11(1):105-15. doi: 10.1007/s10198-009-0206-x. Epub 2009 Dec 5.
7
Palivizumab for respiratory syncytial virus prophylaxis in high-risk infants: a cost-effectiveness analysis.帕利珠单抗用于高危婴儿呼吸道合胞病毒预防:一项成本效益分析。
Clin Ther. 2000 Nov;22(11):1357-69. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(00)83032-5.
8
[The efficiency (cost-effectiveness) of palivizumab as prophylaxis against respiratory syncytial virus infection in premature infants with a gestational age of 32-35 weeks in Spain].[帕利珠单抗对西班牙孕周为32 - 35周的早产儿预防呼吸道合胞病毒感染的有效性(成本效益)]
An Pediatr (Barc). 2006 Oct;65(4):316-24. doi: 10.1157/13092505.
9
Cost-effectiveness of rule-based immunoprophylaxis against respiratory syncytial virus infections in preterm infants.基于规则的免疫预防策略对早产儿呼吸道合胞病毒感染的成本效益分析。
Eur J Pediatr. 2018 Jan;177(1):133-144. doi: 10.1007/s00431-017-3046-1. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
10
The cost-effectiveness of palivizumab in infants with cystic fibrosis in the Canadian setting: A decision analysis model.加拿大背景下帕利珠单抗用于囊性纤维化婴儿的成本效益:一项决策分析模型
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2017 Mar 4;13(3):599-606. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2016.1235670. Epub 2016 Oct 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-utility analysis of palivizumab for preventing respiratory syncytial virus in preterm neonates and infants in Colombia.哥伦比亚早产儿和婴儿使用帕利珠单抗预防呼吸道合胞病毒的成本-效用分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Apr 19;24(1):418. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09300-5.
2
Cost-effectiveness analysis of nirsevimab and maternal RSVpreF vaccine strategies for prevention of Respiratory Syncytial Virus disease among infants in Canada: a simulation study.加拿大预防婴儿呼吸道合胞病毒疾病的尼塞韦单抗和母体呼吸道合胞病毒前融合蛋白疫苗策略的成本效益分析:一项模拟研究
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2023 Nov 9;28:100629. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2023.100629. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Urgent air transfers for acute respiratory infections among children from Northern Canada, 2005-2014.
2005-2014 年加拿大北部儿童急性呼吸道感染的紧急空运。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 28;17(7):e0272154. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272154. eCollection 2022.
4
Health care costs of hospitalization of young children for respiratory syncytial virus infections: a population-based matched cohort study.婴幼儿因呼吸道合胞病毒感染住院的医疗费用:一项基于人群的匹配队列研究。
CMAJ Open. 2021 Oct 19;9(4):E948-E956. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200219. Print 2021 Oct-Dec.
5
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of RSV infant and maternal immunization programs: A case study of Nunavik, Canada.呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)婴幼儿及孕产妇免疫项目的有效性和成本效益:以加拿大努纳维克为例的案例研究
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Sep 24;41:101141. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101141. eCollection 2021 Nov.
6
Should we use Palivizumab immunoprophylaxis for infants against respiratory syncytial virus? - a cost-utility analysis.我们应该使用帕利珠单抗对婴儿进行呼吸道合胞病毒免疫预防吗?——一项成本效用分析。
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2018 Dec 17;7(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13584-018-0258-4.
7
Cost-effectiveness of palivizumab compared to no prophylaxis in term infants residing in the Canadian Arctic.在加拿大北极地区的足月儿中,与不进行预防措施相比,帕利珠单抗的成本效益。
CMAJ Open. 2016 Oct 18;4(4):E623-E633. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20150052. eCollection 2016 Oct-Dec.
8
The cost-effectiveness of palivizumab in infants with cystic fibrosis in the Canadian setting: A decision analysis model.加拿大背景下帕利珠单抗用于囊性纤维化婴儿的成本效益:一项决策分析模型
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2017 Mar 4;13(3):599-606. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2016.1235670. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
9
Preventing hospitalizations for respiratory syncytial virus infection.预防呼吸道合胞病毒感染导致的住院治疗。
Paediatr Child Health. 2015 Aug-Sep;20(6):321-33. doi: 10.1093/pch/20.6.321.
10
Global systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of indigenous health interventions.本土卫生干预措施成本效益的全球系统评价
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 5;9(11):e111249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111249. eCollection 2014.