Ginsberg Gary M, Somekh Eli, Schlesinger Yechiel
Department of Technology Assessment, Public Health Service, Ministry of Health, Jerusalem, Israel.
Department of Pediatrics, Wolfson Hospital, Holon, and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel.
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2018 Dec 17;7(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13584-018-0258-4.
Passive immunization against RSV (Respiratory Syncytial Virus) is given in most western countries (including Israel) to infants of high risk groups such as premature babies, and infants with Congenital Heart Disease or Congenital Lung Disease. However, immunoprophylaxis costs are extremely high ($2800-$4200 per infant). Using cost-utility analysis criteria, we evaluate whether it is justified to expand, continue or restrict nationwide immunoprophylaxis using palivizumab of high risk infants against RSV.
Epidemiological, demographic, health service utilisation and economic data were integrated from primary (National Hospitalization Data, etc.) and secondary data sources (ie: from published articles) into a spread-sheet to calculate the cost per averted disability-adjusted life year (DALY) of vaccinating various infant risk groups. Costs of intervention included antibody plus administration costs. Treatment savings and DALYs averted were estimated from applying vaccine efficacy data to relative risks of being hospitalised and treated for RSV, including possible long-term sequelae like asthma and wheezing.
For all the groups RSV immunoprophylaxis is clearly not cost effective as its cost per averted DALY exceeds the $105,986 guideline representing thrice the per capita Gross Domestic Product. Vaccine price would have to fall by 48.1% in order to justify vaccinating Congenital Heart Disease or Congenital Lung Disease risk groups respectively on pure cost-effectiveness grounds. For premature babies of < 29 weeks, 29-32 and 33-36 weeks gestation, decreases of 36.8%, 54.5% and 83.3% respectively in vaccine price are required.
Based solely on cost-utility analysis, at current price levels it is difficult to justify the current indications for passive vaccination with Palivizumab against RSV. However, if the manufacturers would reduce the price by 54.5% then it would be cost-effective to vaccinate the Congenital Heart Disease or Congenital Lung Disease risk groups as well as premature babies born before the 33rd week of gestation.
在大多数西方国家(包括以色列),针对呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)对高危群体的婴儿进行被动免疫,这些高危群体包括早产儿、患有先天性心脏病或先天性肺病的婴儿。然而,免疫预防成本极高(每名婴儿2800 - 4200美元)。我们使用成本效用分析标准,评估扩大、继续或限制在全国范围内使用帕利珠单抗对高危婴儿进行RSV免疫预防是否合理。
将来自主要数据源(国家住院数据等)和次要数据源(即已发表文章)的流行病学、人口统计学、卫生服务利用和经济数据整合到电子表格中,以计算为不同婴儿风险群体接种疫苗每避免一个残疾调整生命年(DALY)的成本。干预成本包括抗体及给药成本。通过将疫苗效力数据应用于因RSV住院和接受治疗的相对风险(包括哮喘和喘息等可能的长期后遗症)来估计治疗节省费用和避免的DALYs。
对于所有群体,RSV免疫预防显然不具有成本效益,因为其每避免一个DALY的成本超过了代表人均国内生产总值三倍的105,986美元的指导标准。仅基于成本效益,疫苗价格分别需要下降48.1%,才能证明为先天性心脏病或先天性肺病风险群体接种疫苗是合理的。对于孕周小于29周、29 - 32周和33 - 36周的早产儿,疫苗价格分别需要下降36.8%、54.5%和83.3%。
仅基于成本效用分析,按照当前价格水平,很难证明目前使用帕利珠单抗对RSV进行被动疫苗接种的适应证是合理的。然而,如果制造商将价格降低54.5%,那么为先天性心脏病或先天性肺病风险群体以及孕33周前出生的早产儿接种疫苗将具有成本效益。