• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

质疑 Yelp 效应:基于网络的紧急护理评论的混合方法分析。

Questioning the Yelp Effect: Mixed Methods Analysis of Web-Based Reviews of Urgent Cares.

机构信息

Department of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States.

Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 8;23(10):e29406. doi: 10.2196/29406.

DOI:10.2196/29406
PMID:34623316
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8538031/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Providers of on-demand care, such as those in urgent care centers, may prescribe antibiotics unnecessarily because they fear receiving negative reviews on web-based platforms from unsatisfied patients-the so-called Yelp effect. This effect is hypothesized to be a significant driver of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing, which exacerbates antibiotic resistance.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we aimed to determine the frequency with which patients left negative reviews on web-based platforms after they expected to receive antibiotics in an urgent care setting but did not.

METHODS

We obtained a list of 8662 urgent care facilities from the Yelp application programming interface. By using this list, we automatically collected 481,825 web-based reviews from Google Maps between January 21 and February 10, 2019. We used machine learning algorithms to summarize the contents of these reviews. Additionally, 200 randomly sampled reviews were analyzed by 4 annotators to verify the types of messages present and whether they were consistent with the Yelp effect.

RESULTS

We collected 481,825 reviews, of which 1696 (95% CI 1240-2152) exhibited the Yelp effect. Negative reviews primarily identified operations issues regarding wait times, rude staff, billing, and communication.

CONCLUSIONS

Urgent care patients rarely express expectations for antibiotics in negative web-based reviews. Thus, our findings do not support an association between a lack of antibiotic prescriptions and negative web-based reviews. Rather, patients' dissatisfaction with urgent care was most strongly linked to operations issues that were not related to the clinical management plan.

摘要

背景

按需医疗服务提供者,如急诊中心的医生,可能会不必要地开出抗生素,因为他们担心在基于网络的平台上收到不满意患者的负面评价——所谓的 Yelp 效应。这种效应被假设是不合理使用抗生素的一个重要驱动因素,会加剧抗生素耐药性。

目的

在这项研究中,我们旨在确定在急诊环境中患者预期接受抗生素治疗但未获得时在网络平台上留下负面评价的频率。

方法

我们从 Yelp 应用程序接口获取了 8662 家急诊中心的列表。通过使用该列表,我们在 2019 年 1 月 21 日至 2 月 10 日期间通过 Google Maps 自动收集了 481825 条网络评价。我们使用机器学习算法来总结这些评价的内容。此外,通过 4 名注释者分析了 200 条随机抽样的评价,以验证存在的信息类型以及它们是否与 Yelp 效应一致。

结果

我们共收集了 481825 条评价,其中 1696 条(95%CI 1240-2152)表现出了 Yelp 效应。负面评价主要针对等待时间、工作人员粗鲁、计费和沟通等运营问题。

结论

急诊患者在负面网络评价中很少表达对抗生素的期望。因此,我们的发现并不支持缺乏抗生素处方与负面网络评价之间存在关联。相反,患者对急诊的不满主要与与临床管理计划无关的运营问题有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14be/8538031/a997264447a4/jmir_v23i10e29406_fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14be/8538031/5843d6df2bb2/jmir_v23i10e29406_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14be/8538031/169b1126ede1/jmir_v23i10e29406_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14be/8538031/6923393a4eb0/jmir_v23i10e29406_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14be/8538031/1cf42e97ee54/jmir_v23i10e29406_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14be/8538031/e2229da3ad0d/jmir_v23i10e29406_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14be/8538031/5479feda9596/jmir_v23i10e29406_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14be/8538031/a997264447a4/jmir_v23i10e29406_fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14be/8538031/5843d6df2bb2/jmir_v23i10e29406_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14be/8538031/169b1126ede1/jmir_v23i10e29406_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14be/8538031/6923393a4eb0/jmir_v23i10e29406_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14be/8538031/1cf42e97ee54/jmir_v23i10e29406_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14be/8538031/e2229da3ad0d/jmir_v23i10e29406_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14be/8538031/5479feda9596/jmir_v23i10e29406_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14be/8538031/a997264447a4/jmir_v23i10e29406_fig7.jpg

相似文献

1
Questioning the Yelp Effect: Mixed Methods Analysis of Web-Based Reviews of Urgent Cares.质疑 Yelp 效应:基于网络的紧急护理评论的混合方法分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 8;23(10):e29406. doi: 10.2196/29406.
2
Online Ratings of the Patient Experience: Emergency Departments Versus Urgent Care Centers.在线患者体验评分:急诊科与紧急护理中心。
Ann Emerg Med. 2019 Jun;73(6):631-638. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.09.029. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
3
Evaluation of Dermatology Practice Online Reviews: Lessons From Qualitative Analysis.皮肤科在线评论评价:定性分析的启示。
JAMA Dermatol. 2016 Feb;152(2):153-7. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.3950.
4
"But His Yelp Reviews Are Awful!": Analysis of General Surgeons' Yelp Reviews.“但他在Yelp上的评价糟透了!”:普通外科医生Yelp评价分析
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Apr 30;21(4):e11646. doi: 10.2196/11646.
5
The Ratings Game: Demographic and Practice Factors Affecting Yelp Ratings of Plastic Surgeons.《评级游戏:影响整形医生 Yelp 评级的人口统计学和实践因素》
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Aug 1;152(2):463-471. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010298. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
6
Yelp Reviews Of Hospital Care Can Supplement And Inform Traditional Surveys Of The Patient Experience Of Care.Yelp上对医院护理的评价可以补充并为传统的患者护理体验调查提供信息。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Apr;35(4):697-705. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1030.
7
Association Between Online Reviews of Substance Use Disorder Treatment Facilities and Drug-Induced Mortality Rates: Cross-Sectional Analysis.物质使用障碍治疗机构的在线评论与药物所致死亡率之间的关联:横断面分析
JMIR AI. 2023 Dec 29;2:e46317. doi: 10.2196/46317.
8
Patient experiences at dental school clinics: A comparative analysis of online reviews.患者在牙科学院诊所的就诊体验:在线评论的对比分析。
J Dent Educ. 2022 Jan;86(1):77-87. doi: 10.1002/jdd.12782. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
9
Negative online reviews of orthodontists: Content analysis of complaints posted by dissatisfied patients.正畸医生的负面在线评价:对不满意患者发布的投诉内容进行的分析
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020 Aug;158(2):237-246.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.02.005.
10
Reversing the Antibiotic Resistance "Yelp Effect" Through the Use of Emotionally Framed Responses to Negative Reviews of Providers: Questionnaire Study.通过对医疗服务提供者负面评价采用情感框架回应来逆转抗生素耐药性的“Yelp效应”:问卷调查研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Mar 22;6(3):e26122. doi: 10.2196/26122.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation of an Antibiotic Stewardship Initiative in a Large Urgent Care Network.在一个大型紧急护理网络中实施抗生素管理计划。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 May 1;6(5):e2313011. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.13011.
2
The Use of Web-Based Patient Reviews to Assess Medical Oncologists' Competency: Mixed Methods Sequential Explanatory Study.利用基于网络的患者评价评估肿瘤内科医生的能力:混合方法序列解释性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 May 4;7:e39857. doi: 10.2196/39857.

本文引用的文献

1
Opioid prescribing habits of podiatric surgeons following elective foot and ankle surgery.足踝外科医生在择期足踝手术后的阿片类药物处方习惯。
Foot (Edinb). 2020 Dec;45:101710. doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2020.101710. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
2
Chronic Pain Practices: An Evaluation of Positive and Negative Online Patient Reviews.慢性疼痛治疗实践:积极和消极在线患者评价的评估。
Pain Physician. 2019 Sep;22(5):E477-E486.
3
Patients' and Clinicians' Perceptions of Antibiotic Prescribing for Upper Respiratory Infections in the Acute Care Setting.
患者和临床医生对上呼吸道感染在急性护理环境中抗生素处方的看法。
Med Decis Making. 2018 Jul;38(5):547-561. doi: 10.1177/0272989X18770664.
4
How Online Quality Ratings Influence Patients' Choice of Medical Providers: Controlled Experimental Survey Study.在线质量评级如何影响患者对医疗服务提供者的选择:对照实验调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Mar 26;20(3):e99. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8986.
5
Online physician ratings fail to predict actual performance on measures of quality, value, and peer review.在线医生评级未能预测实际的质量、价值和同行评审措施的表现。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Apr 1;25(4):401-407. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx083.
6
Categorical Risk Perception Drives Variability in Antibiotic Prescribing in the Emergency Department: A Mixed Methods Observational Study.类别风险感知驱动急诊科抗生素处方的变异性:一项混合方法观察性研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Oct;32(10):1083-1089. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4099-6. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
7
Tracking Hookah Bars in New York: Utilizing Yelp as a Powerful Public Health Tool.追踪纽约的水烟酒吧:利用 Yelp 作为强大的公共卫生工具。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2015 Nov 20;1(2):e19. doi: 10.2196/publichealth.4809. eCollection 2015 Jul-Dec.
8
Prevalence of Inappropriate Antibiotic Prescriptions Among US Ambulatory Care Visits, 2010-2011.2010-2011 年美国门诊就诊中不适当抗生素处方的流行率。
JAMA. 2016 May 3;315(17):1864-73. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.4151.
9
Yelp Reviews Of Hospital Care Can Supplement And Inform Traditional Surveys Of The Patient Experience Of Care.Yelp上对医院护理的评价可以补充并为传统的患者护理体验调查提供信息。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Apr;35(4):697-705. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1030.
10
Germs are germs, and why not take a risk? Patients' expectations for prescribing antibiotics in an inner-city emergency department.细菌就是细菌,为什么不冒这个险呢?城市急诊科患者对抗生素处方的期望。
Med Decis Making. 2015 Jan;35(1):60-7. doi: 10.1177/0272989X14553472. Epub 2014 Oct 20.