Clinic of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Clin Oral Investig. 2010 Dec;14(6):675-81. doi: 10.1007/s00784-009-0352-7. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
There is no data concerning the use of the intraseptal anaesthesia (ISA) for single tooth extraction. The aims of this study were to compare the clinical efficacy and haemodynamic responses of the ISA with the periodontal ligament anaesthesia (PLA) for single tooth extraction. Thirty-five randomly selected healthy patients (ASA I) undergoing maxillary lateral incisors extraction entered the study. Onset of anaesthesia, the width of the anaesthetic field and duration of anaesthesia were recorded by pinprick testing. Intensity of anaesthesia was evaluated on a visual analogue scale. Haemodynamic parameters were recorded simultaneously at different time points after anaesthesia injection. The two techniques of local anaesthesia did not show statistically significant differences regarding the success rate and onset of anaesthesia, while the duration of the ISA on the buccal site was significantly longer in comparison with the PLA. The intensity of the achieved anaesthesia, estimated by the experienced pain during procedure, pointed out that pain was recorded in 24% of cases in the ISA group, and in 19% in the PLA group without significant differences. Postoperative pain was found to be smaller in the ISA group (70.9% of treated sites) than in the PLA group (81.3% of treated sites); however, this difference was not significant. Although the heart rate increased in both groups, there were no significant differences in the patients' haemodynamic response between the ISA and the PLA. The results of the present study indicate that both techniques are useful and suitable for the routine tooth extraction.
目前尚无关于使用间隔内麻醉(ISA)进行单颗牙齿拔除的相关数据。本研究旨在比较 ISA 和牙周韧带麻醉(PLA)在单颗牙齿拔除中的临床疗效和血液动力学反应。35 名随机选择的健康患者(ASA I)接受上颌侧切牙拔除术进入研究。通过针刺测试记录麻醉开始时间、麻醉区域宽度和麻醉持续时间。通过视觉模拟评分评估麻醉强度。在麻醉注射后的不同时间点同时记录血液动力学参数。两种局部麻醉技术在麻醉成功率和麻醉开始时间方面没有统计学差异,而与 PLA 相比,ISA 在颊侧的持续时间明显更长。通过手术过程中感觉到的疼痛来评估所达到的麻醉强度,ISA 组有 24%的病例记录到疼痛,而 PLA 组有 19%的病例记录到疼痛,差异无统计学意义。ISA 组(70.9%的治疗部位)的术后疼痛比 PLA 组(81.3%的治疗部位)小,但差异无统计学意义。虽然两组的心率均增加,但 ISA 和 PLA 之间患者的血液动力学反应没有显著差异。本研究结果表明,这两种技术均有用且适用于常规牙齿拔除。