Maj, USAF, DC, Commander, 28th Dental Flight, Ellsworth AFB, South Dakota.
Maj, USAF, DC, Training Officer, Advanced Education in General Dentistry Residency, Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland, Texas.
Anesth Prog. 2020 Dec 1;67(4):200-206. doi: 10.2344/anpr-67-02-11.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the manufacturer's claims regarding a novel needleless intraligamentary local anesthesia injection device (Numbee, BioDent) to provide effective single tooth anesthesia. Investigators compared the Numbee with a traditional inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) during a restorative procedure on mandibular teeth. A randomized, split-mouth design was conducted with 15 adult subjects receiving an IANB on one side and a Numbee injection on the same tooth type on the contralateral side. Subjects recorded injection pain using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and their preferred injection technique. Anesthesia was considered profound with 2 consecutive electric pulp tester readings of 80. If subjects became symptomatic during the restorative procedure, rescue anesthesia was administered. The difference in VAS scores for injection pain between the Numbee and the IANB was not significant (p = .078). For the IANB, the incidence of profound anesthesia was 46%, and required rescue anesthesia was 20%. For the Numbee, the incidence of profound anesthesia was 0%, and required rescue anesthesia was 60%. Subject preference was evenly split (50/50%) between the 2 techniques. The IANB outperformed the Numbee device for achieving profound anesthesia and requiring less rescue anesthesia.
本研究旨在调查一种新型无针式牙髓内局部麻醉注射装置(Numbee,BioDent)的制造商声称,以提供有效的单颗牙齿麻醉效果。研究人员在下颌牙齿的修复过程中,将 Numbee 与传统的下牙槽神经阻滞麻醉(IANB)进行了比较。采用随机、分侧设计,15 名成年受试者一侧接受 IANB,对侧同类型牙齿接受 Numbee 注射。受试者使用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)记录注射疼痛,并记录他们更喜欢的注射技术。如果连续两次电活力计读数为 80,则认为麻醉效果显著。如果在修复过程中出现症状,将给予急救麻醉。Numbee 和 IANB 的注射疼痛 VAS 评分差异无统计学意义(p =.078)。对于 IANB,麻醉效果显著的发生率为 46%,需要急救麻醉的比例为 20%。对于 Numbee,麻醉效果显著的发生率为 0%,需要急救麻醉的比例为 60%。两种技术的受试者偏好比例相当(各占 50%)。IANB 在实现显著麻醉效果和需要较少急救麻醉方面优于 Numbee 装置。