• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三部分型肱骨近端骨折的生物力学评估:一项尸体研究。

Biomechanical evaluation of 3-part proximal humerus fractures: a cadaveric study.

作者信息

Gillespie Robert J, Ramachandran Vimala, Lea Ethan S, Vallier Heather A

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.

出版信息

Orthopedics. 2009 Nov;32(11):816. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20090922-06.

DOI:10.3928/01477447-20090922-06
PMID:19902894
Abstract

Proximal humerus fractures occur frequently, and treatment remains controversial. This study compares stiffness in axial loading for 3 methods of fixation (locking compression plate, standard (nonlocking) proximal humerus plate, and blade plate) in a 3-part proximal humerus fracture model. Twelve paired proximal humeri were obtained from embalmed human cadavers and separated into 3 groups. Osteotomies of the surgical neck and greater tuberosity were created to simulate a 3-part proximal humerus fracture. After fixation, constructs were axially loaded in 20 degrees of abduction for 200 cycles in an Instron materials testing machine (Norwood, Massachusetts). The blade plate (mean, 146.87+/-28.9 N/mm) demonstrated 29% more mean stiffness than the standard plate (mean, 113.0+/-22.3 N/mm; P=.19). The locking compression plate (mean, 130.71+/-39.2 N/mm) exhibited 15% greater stiffness compared to the standard plate in our 3-part model (P=.58). The blade plate demonstrated 12% greater stiffness than the locking compression plate (P=.64). There was no significant difference in mean stiffness between the fixed-angle devices and the standard plate. Future in vitro and clinical studies of plate devices for proximal humerus fractures would be worthwhile to determine the benefits and limitations of various implants for specific types of fractures, including clinical performance and cost of care.

摘要

肱骨近端骨折很常见,其治疗方法仍存在争议。本研究在三部分肱骨近端骨折模型中比较了三种固定方法(锁定加压钢板、标准(非锁定)肱骨近端钢板和接骨板)在轴向加载时的刚度。从防腐处理的人体尸体上获取了12对肱骨近端,并将其分为3组。在外科颈和大结节处进行截骨,以模拟三部分肱骨近端骨折。固定后,在Instron材料试验机(马萨诸塞州诺伍德)中,将构建体在20度外展位轴向加载200个循环。接骨板(平均值为146.87±28.9 N/mm)的平均刚度比标准钢板(平均值为113.0±22.3 N/mm;P = 0.19)高29%。在我们的三部分模型中,锁定加压钢板(平均值为130.71±39.2 N/mm)的刚度比标准钢板高15%(P = 0.58)。接骨板的刚度比锁定加压钢板高12%(P = 0.64)。角度固定装置和标准钢板之间的平均刚度没有显著差异。未来对肱骨近端骨折钢板装置进行体外和临床研究,以确定各种植入物对特定类型骨折的益处和局限性,包括临床性能和护理成本,将是很有价值的。

相似文献

1
Biomechanical evaluation of 3-part proximal humerus fractures: a cadaveric study.三部分型肱骨近端骨折的生物力学评估:一项尸体研究。
Orthopedics. 2009 Nov;32(11):816. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20090922-06.
2
Biomechanical analysis of blade plate versus locking plate fixation for a proximal humerus fracture: comparison using cadaveric and synthetic humeri.肱骨近端骨折采用接骨板与锁定钢板固定的生物力学分析:使用尸体肱骨和人工合成肱骨进行比较
J Orthop Trauma. 2006 Sep;20(8):547-54. doi: 10.1097/01.bot.0000244997.52751.58.
3
Proximal humerus fracture rotational stability after fixation using a locking plate or a fixed-angle locked nail: the role of implant stiffness.使用锁定钢板或角稳定锁定髓内钉固定后肱骨近端骨折的旋转稳定性:植入物刚度的作用
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2010 May;25(4):307-11. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.01.009. Epub 2010 Feb 13.
4
Biomechanical comparison of a unique locking plate versus a standard plate for internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures in a cadaveric model.在尸体模型中对一种独特的锁定钢板与标准钢板用于肱骨近端骨折内固定的生物力学比较。
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2006 Dec;21(10):1027-31. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.06.005. Epub 2006 Aug 17.
5
A comparative biomechanical analysis of implants for the stabilization of proximal humerus fractures.用于稳定肱骨近端骨折的植入物的比较生物力学分析。
Technol Health Care. 2006;14(4-5):261-70.
6
Are locking screws advantageous with plate fixation of humeral shaft fractures? A biomechanical analysis of synthetic and cadaveric bone.锁定螺钉在肱骨干骨折钢板固定中是否具有优势?对合成骨和尸体骨的生物力学分析。
J Orthop Trauma. 2008 Nov-Dec;22(10):709-15. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31818df8cb.
7
Proximal humerus fractures: a comparative biomechanical analysis of intra and extramedullary implants.肱骨近端骨折:髓内与髓外植入物的比较生物力学分析
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007 Aug;127(6):441-7. doi: 10.1007/s00402-007-0319-6. Epub 2007 Apr 25.
8
Biomechanical analysis of plate osteosynthesis systems for proximal humerus fractures.肱骨近端骨折钢板内固定系统的生物力学分析
J Orthop Trauma. 2008 Jan;22(1):23-9. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31815c89ce.
9
Evaluation of a novel, nonspanning external fixator for treatment of unstable extra-articular fractures of the distal radius: biomechanical comparison with a volar locking plate.一种新型非跨越外固定器治疗桡骨远端不稳定关节外骨折的评估:与掌侧锁定钢板的生物力学比较
J Trauma. 2008 Apr;64(4):975-81. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3180eea9f0.
10
[Angle-fixed plate fixation or double-plate osteosynthesis in fractures of the proximal humerus: a biomechanical study].[肱骨近端骨折的角钢板固定或双钢板接骨术:一项生物力学研究]
Biomed Tech (Berl). 2008 Jun;53(3):130-7. doi: 10.1515/BMT.2008.018.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of different devices for surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures in adults: a systematic review.成人肱骨近端骨折的不同手术器械治疗:系统评价。
Acta Biomed. 2021 Sep 2;92(4):e2021198. doi: 10.23750/abm.v92i4.11394.
2
Biomechanical analysis of plate systems for proximal humerus fractures: a systematic literature review.肱骨近端骨折内固定系统的生物力学分析:系统文献回顾。
Biomed Eng Online. 2018 Apr 27;17(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12938-018-0479-3.
3
Hybrid blade and locking plate fixation for proximal humerus fractures: a comparative biomechanical analysis.
杂交刀片与锁定钢板固定治疗肱骨近端骨折:一项对比生物力学分析。
Biomed Eng Online. 2018 Jan 25;17(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12938-018-0447-y.
4
Mechanical quantification of local bone quality in the humeral head: a feasibility study.肱骨头局部骨质量的力学量化:一项可行性研究。
Open Orthop J. 2013 May 17;7:172-6. doi: 10.2174/1874325001307010172. Print 2013.
5
Surgical treatment options in patients with impaired bone quality.骨质量受损患者的手术治疗选择。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Aug;469(8):2237-47. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1838-6.