Kondo Naoki, Sembajwe Grace, Kawachi Ichiro, van Dam Rob M, Subramanian S V, Yamagata Zentaro
Department of Health Sciences, Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Medicine and Engineering, University of Yamanashi, 1110 Shimokato, Chuo-Shi, Yamanashi, 409-3898 Japan.
BMJ. 2009 Nov 10;339:b4471. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b4471.
To provide quantitative evaluations on the association between income inequality and health.
Random effects meta-analyses, calculating the overall relative risk for subsequent mortality among prospective cohort studies and the overall odds ratio for poor self rated health among cross sectional studies.
PubMed, the ISI Web of Science, and the National Bureau for Economic Research database. Review methods Peer reviewed papers with multilevel data. Results The meta-analysis included 59 509 857 subjects in nine cohort studies and 1 280 211 subjects in 19 cross sectional studies. The overall cohort relative risk and cross sectional odds ratio (95% confidence intervals) per 0.05 unit increase in Gini coefficient, a measure of income inequality, was 1.08 (1.06 to 1.10) and 1.04 (1.02 to 1.06), respectively. Meta-regressions showed stronger associations between income inequality and the health outcomes among studies with higher Gini (>or=0.3), conducted with data after 1990, with longer duration of follow-up (>7 years), and incorporating time lags between income inequality and outcomes. By contrast, analyses accounting for unmeasured regional characteristics showed a weaker association between income inequality and health. Conclusions The results suggest a modest adverse effect of income inequality on health, although the population impact might be larger if the association is truly causal. The results also support the threshold effect hypothesis, which posits the existence of a threshold of income inequality beyond which adverse impacts on health begin to emerge. The findings need to be interpreted with caution given the heterogeneity between studies, as well as the attenuation of the risk estimates in analyses that attempted to control for the unmeasured characteristics of areas with high levels of income inequality.
对收入不平等与健康之间的关联进行定量评估。
随机效应荟萃分析,计算前瞻性队列研究中后续死亡率的总体相对风险以及横断面研究中自我健康评价差的总体比值比。
PubMed、科学引文索引(ISI)数据库以及美国国家经济研究局数据库。综述方法:对具有多层次数据的同行评审论文进行分析。结果:荟萃分析纳入了9项队列研究中的59509857名受试者以及19项横断面研究中的1280211名受试者。作为收入不平等衡量指标的基尼系数每增加0.05个单位,总体队列相对风险和横断面比值比(95%置信区间)分别为1.08(1.06至1.10)和1.04(1.02至1.06)。荟萃回归显示,在基尼系数较高(≥0.3)、1990年后进行的数据收集、随访时间较长(>7年)且纳入了收入不平等与结果之间时间滞后因素的研究中,收入不平等与健康结果之间的关联更强。相比之下,考虑未测量的区域特征的分析显示收入不平等与健康之间的关联较弱。结论:结果表明收入不平等对健康有适度的不利影响,尽管如果这种关联是真正的因果关系,则对人群的影响可能更大。结果还支持阈值效应假说,该假说认为存在一个收入不平等阈值,超过该阈值对健康的不利影响开始显现。鉴于研究之间的异质性以及在试图控制高收入不平等地区未测量特征的分析中风险估计的衰减,这些发现需要谨慎解释。