Department of Internal Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009 Nov;11(11):739-43. doi: 10.1089/dia.2009.0044.
To discuss the design and baseline data of the Lantus (sanofi-aventis, Paris, France) versus Levemir (Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsvaerd, Denmark) Treat-To-Target (L2T3) study, a multinational, randomized comparison between the basal insulin analogs insulin glargine and insulin detemir.
Insulin-naive subjects with type 2 diabetes suboptimally controlled on oral glucose-lowering drugs (OGLDs) (including at least metformin) were randomized to 24-week treatment with either insulin glargine once-daily or insulin detemir twice-daily, titrated to obtain fasting plasma glucose <100 mg/dL. The primary outcome was the percentage of subjects reaching hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) <7% without symptomatic confirmed hypoglycemia. Important secondary outcomes were quality of life and treatment satisfaction, which were repeatedly assessed using validated questionnaires. Also, biomedical and psychological determinants of failure to reach HbA1c <7% were explored.
Recruitment was completed in November 2007. The majority of the randomized population (n = 973) was white (77.8%) and used one other OGLD beside metformin (70.7%). Concerning patient-reported outcomes, approximately 20% of subjects reported no physical symptoms of fatigue or hyperglycemia before insulin initiation, and approximately 10% were maximally satisfied with their previous treatment. One-third of patients (29.9%) reported suboptimal well-being, and 9.3% had a score indicating depression. Better emotional well-being was significantly associated with lower diabetes symptom distress and higher treatment satisfaction (respectively, r = -0.56 and 0.41; P < 0.001).
The L2T3 study will extend the evidence on both the efficacy and the effects on quality of life and treatment satisfaction of the long-acting insulin analogs glargine and detemir. Additionally, it will increase our understanding of the factors important to the (self-)management of type 2 diabetes patients starting insulin.
讨论 Lantus(赛诺菲-安万特,法国巴黎)与 Levemir(诺和诺德公司,丹麦 Bagsvaerd)治疗目标(L2T3)研究的设计和基线数据,这是一项针对基础胰岛素类似物甘精胰岛素和地特胰岛素的跨国、随机比较研究。
接受口服降糖药物(OGLD)治疗但血糖控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者(包括至少使用二甲双胍),随机接受 24 周甘精胰岛素或地特胰岛素治疗,滴定剂量使空腹血糖<100mg/dL。主要终点是无症状性确诊低血糖情况下达到糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)<7%的患者比例。重要的次要终点是使用经过验证的问卷反复评估的生活质量和治疗满意度。此外,还探讨了未能达到 HbA1c<7%的生物医学和心理决定因素。
招募工作于 2007 年 11 月完成。大多数随机人群(n=973)为白人(77.8%),除了二甲双胍之外还使用了一种其他 OGLD(70.7%)。关于患者报告的结果,大约 20%的患者在开始胰岛素治疗前没有疲劳或高血糖的身体症状,大约 10%的患者对之前的治疗非常满意。三分之一的患者(29.9%)报告生活质量不佳,9.3%的患者有抑郁评分。更好的情绪健康与较低的糖尿病症状困扰和更高的治疗满意度显著相关(分别为 r=-0.56 和 0.41;P<0.001)。
L2T3 研究将扩展长效胰岛素类似物甘精胰岛素和地特胰岛素在疗效以及对生活质量和治疗满意度的影响方面的证据。此外,它将增加我们对开始使用胰岛素的 2 型糖尿病患者自我管理的重要因素的理解。