Department of Internal Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Diabetes Care. 2010 Jun;33(6):1176-8. doi: 10.2337/dc09-2294. Epub 2010 Mar 3.
To determine whether glargine is noninferior to detemir regarding the percentage of patients reaching A1C <7% without symptomatic hypoglycemia <or=3.1 mmol/l.
In this 24-week trial, 973 insulin-naive type 2 diabetic patients on stable oral glucose-lowering drugs with A1C 7.0-10.5% were randomized to glargine once daily or detemir twice daily. Insulin doses were systematically titrated. RESULTS 27.5 and 25.6% of patients reached the primary outcome with glargine and detemir, respectively, demonstrating the noninferiority of glargine. Improvements in A1C were -1.46 +/- 1.09% for glargine and -1.54 +/- 1.11% for detemir (P = 0.149), with similar proportions of patients achieving A1C <7% (P = 0.254) but more detemir-treated patients reaching A1C <6.5% (P = 0.017). Hypoglycemia risk was similar. Weight gain was higher for glargine (difference: 0.77 kg, P < 0.001). Glargine doses were lower than detemir doses: 43.5 +/- 29.0 vs. 76.5 +/- 50.5 units/day (P < 0.001).
In insulin-naive type 2 diabetic patients, glargine reached similar control as detemir, with more weight gain, but required significantly lower doses.
确定甘精胰岛素是否在不出现症状性低血糖(<=3.1mmol/L)的情况下,糖化血红蛋白(A1C)<7%的患者比例方面劣效于地特胰岛素。
在这项 24 周的试验中,973 例接受稳定口服降糖药物治疗的初诊 2 型糖尿病患者,A1C 为 7.0-10.5%,随机分为每日一次甘精胰岛素组或每日两次地特胰岛素组。胰岛素剂量进行系统滴定。结果:甘精胰岛素组和地特胰岛素组分别有 27.5%和 25.6%的患者达到主要终点,表明甘精胰岛素具有非劣效性。A1C 改善分别为甘精胰岛素组-1.46±1.09%和地特胰岛素组-1.54±1.11%(P=0.149),达到 A1C<7%的患者比例相似(P=0.254),但更多的地特胰岛素治疗患者达到 A1C<6.5%(P=0.017)。低血糖风险相似。甘精胰岛素组体重增加更多(差值:0.77kg,P<0.001)。甘精胰岛素剂量低于地特胰岛素剂量:43.5±29.0 与 76.5±50.5 单位/天(P<0.001)。
在初诊 2 型糖尿病患者中,甘精胰岛素与地特胰岛素达到相似的控制效果,体重增加更多,但需要的剂量明显更低。