Institute of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, Denmark.
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Jul;80(1):29-41. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.033. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
To perform a meta-analysis assessing the effects of self-care management interventions in improving glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes by analysing the impact of different study characteristics on the effect size.
A literature search in eight scientific databases up to November 2007 included original studies of randomised controlled trials involving adult patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and evaluating a self-care management intervention.
The 47 included studies yielded 7677 participants. The analysis showed a 0.36% (95% CI 0.21-0.51) improvement in glycaemic control in people who received self-care management treatment. In the univariate meta-regression sample size (effect size 0.42%, p=0.007) and follow-up period (effect size 0.49%, p=0.017) were identified to have significant effect on the effect size in favour of small studies and short follow-up. For type of intervention and duration of intervention there was a non-significant effect on effect size in favour of educational techniques and short interventions.
In type 2 diabetes, there are improvements in glycaemic control in people who receive self-care management treatment with a small advantage to intervention with an educational approach.
Further research on frequency and duration of intervention may provide useful information to identify the most effective regime.
通过分析不同研究特征对效应大小的影响,对自我护理管理干预在改善 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制方面的效果进行荟萃分析。
对截至 2007 年 11 月的 8 个科学数据库中的文献进行了检索,纳入了包含成年 2 型糖尿病患者的随机对照试验的原始研究,这些研究评估了自我护理管理干预措施的效果。
纳入的 47 项研究共纳入 7677 名参与者。分析结果显示,接受自我护理管理治疗的患者血糖控制水平提高了 0.36%(95%CI:0.21-0.51)。在单变量荟萃回归样本量(效应大小为 0.42%,p=0.007)和随访时间(效应大小为 0.49%,p=0.017)方面,对效应大小有显著影响,有利于小样本和短随访的研究。对于干预类型和干预持续时间,有利于教育技术和短期干预的效应大小没有统计学意义。
在 2 型糖尿病患者中,接受自我护理管理治疗的患者血糖控制水平有所改善,采用教育方法的干预具有较小的优势。
进一步研究干预的频率和持续时间可能会提供有用的信息,以确定最有效的治疗方案。