Suppr超能文献

中介效应分析:2 型糖尿病自我护理管理干预的效果——47 项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

Mediating the effect of self-care management intervention in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of 47 randomised controlled trials.

机构信息

Institute of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, Denmark.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Jul;80(1):29-41. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.033. Epub 2009 Nov 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To perform a meta-analysis assessing the effects of self-care management interventions in improving glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes by analysing the impact of different study characteristics on the effect size.

METHODS

A literature search in eight scientific databases up to November 2007 included original studies of randomised controlled trials involving adult patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and evaluating a self-care management intervention.

RESULTS

The 47 included studies yielded 7677 participants. The analysis showed a 0.36% (95% CI 0.21-0.51) improvement in glycaemic control in people who received self-care management treatment. In the univariate meta-regression sample size (effect size 0.42%, p=0.007) and follow-up period (effect size 0.49%, p=0.017) were identified to have significant effect on the effect size in favour of small studies and short follow-up. For type of intervention and duration of intervention there was a non-significant effect on effect size in favour of educational techniques and short interventions.

CONCLUSION

In type 2 diabetes, there are improvements in glycaemic control in people who receive self-care management treatment with a small advantage to intervention with an educational approach.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Further research on frequency and duration of intervention may provide useful information to identify the most effective regime.

摘要

目的

通过分析不同研究特征对效应大小的影响,对自我护理管理干预在改善 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制方面的效果进行荟萃分析。

方法

对截至 2007 年 11 月的 8 个科学数据库中的文献进行了检索,纳入了包含成年 2 型糖尿病患者的随机对照试验的原始研究,这些研究评估了自我护理管理干预措施的效果。

结果

纳入的 47 项研究共纳入 7677 名参与者。分析结果显示,接受自我护理管理治疗的患者血糖控制水平提高了 0.36%(95%CI:0.21-0.51)。在单变量荟萃回归样本量(效应大小为 0.42%,p=0.007)和随访时间(效应大小为 0.49%,p=0.017)方面,对效应大小有显著影响,有利于小样本和短随访的研究。对于干预类型和干预持续时间,有利于教育技术和短期干预的效应大小没有统计学意义。

结论

在 2 型糖尿病患者中,接受自我护理管理治疗的患者血糖控制水平有所改善,采用教育方法的干预具有较小的优势。

实践意义

进一步研究干预的频率和持续时间可能会提供有用的信息,以确定最有效的治疗方案。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验