Room 821, The Esther Lee Building, The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong.
Room 733, The Esther Lee Building, The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Mar;79:43-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.10.021. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
Despite extensive efforts and advances in evidence-based diabetes management, poor glycaemic control still remains a challenge in many countries. There is a paucity of research addressing the needs of patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes, or exploring the effectiveness of empowerment-based interventions in this vulnerable population.
To evaluate the effectiveness of a patient-centred, empowerment-based programme on glycaemic control and self-management behaviours among patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes.
A prospective multi-centre, single-blind, randomised controlled trial.
Adult patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes [Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) ≥7.5% in the recent six months] were recruited from two tertiary hospitals in Xi'an city, China.
A total of 242 eligible patients were recruited and randomly assigned to the intervention or attentional control groups after baseline measurement. Participants in the intervention group received a 6-week patient-centred, empowerment-based self-management programme, which is theoretically grounded on the principles of the Empowerment Process Model-setting personally meaningful goals, taking action towards goals and reflecting on the impact of action plans. Those in the attentional control group received health education classes and post-discharge follow-up. Outcome measures included glycaemic control (measured by HbA1c) and self-management behaviours. Data were collected at baseline, and at 8th and 20th week after enrolment. Intervention effect were analysed using the generalised estimating equation model on the basis of the intention-to-treat principle.
Compared with the attention control group, the intervention group showed a non-significant HbA1c reduction of 0. 476% (Cohen's d effect size=0.31, p=0.162). The intervention group exhibited significant improvements in general diet management at the 8th-week (β=0.740; p=0.013), specific diet management at 8th-week (β=0.646; p=0.022) and 20th-week (β=0.517; p=0.043), and blood glucose self-monitoring at both the 8th- (β=0.793; p=0.009) and 20th-week (β=0.739; p=0.017) follow-ups. No intervention-related adverse events were observed.
Findings indicate that the patient-centred, empowerment-based self-management intervention program did not induce a significant HbA1c reduction. Whereas this intervention yields improvements in diet management and blood glucose self-monitoring among patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes.
尽管在循证糖尿病管理方面进行了广泛的努力和进展,但许多国家的血糖控制仍然不佳仍是一个挑战。针对血糖控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者的需求,或探索基于赋权的干预措施在这一弱势群体中的有效性的研究很少。
评估以患者为中心、基于赋权的方案对血糖控制和血糖控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者自我管理行为的影响。
前瞻性多中心、单盲、随机对照试验。
在中国西安市的两家三级医院招募了血糖控制不佳的成年 2 型糖尿病患者[最近 6 个月内糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)≥7.5%]。
在基线测量后,共有 242 名符合条件的患者被招募并随机分配到干预组或注意力对照组。干预组患者接受了为期 6 周的以患者为中心、基于赋权的自我管理方案,该方案在理论上基于赋权过程模型的原则,即设定有意义的个人目标、朝着目标采取行动并反思行动计划的影响。注意力对照组接受健康教育课程和出院后随访。主要结局指标包括血糖控制(通过 HbA1c 测量)和自我管理行为。数据在基线时、入组后第 8 周和第 20 周收集。基于意向治疗原则,使用广义估计方程模型分析干预效果。
与注意力对照组相比,干预组 HbA1c 降低不显著,降低了 0.476%(Cohen's d 效应量=0.31,p=0.162)。干预组在第 8 周时的一般饮食管理(β=0.740;p=0.013)、第 8 周和第 20 周时的特定饮食管理(β=0.646;p=0.022)和第 8 周和第 20 周时的血糖自我监测(β=0.793;p=0.009)均显著改善。第 20 周时血糖自我监测(β=0.739;p=0.017)也显著改善。未观察到与干预相关的不良事件。
研究结果表明,以患者为中心、基于赋权的自我管理干预方案并未显著降低 HbA1c。然而,该干预措施可改善血糖控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者的饮食管理和血糖自我监测。