Northern Rivers University, Department of Rural Health, University of Sydney, Lismore, New South Wales, Australia.
Epidemiology. 2010 Jan;21(1):47-55. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181c15d5a.
Little research has investigated the health effects of particulate exposure from bushfires (also called wildfires, biomass fires, or vegetation fires), and these exposures are likely to increase, for several reasons. We investigated associations of daily mortality and hospital admissions with bushfire-derived particulates, compared with particulates from urban sources in Sydney, Australia from 1994 through 2002.
On days with the highest particulate matter (PM)10 concentrations, we assumed PM10 was due primarily to bushfires. We calculated the contribution of bushfire PM10 on these days by subtracting the background PM10 concentration estimated from surrounding days. We assumed PM10 on the remaining days was from usual urban sources. We implemented a Poisson model, with a bootstrap-based methodology, to select optimum smoothed covariate functions, and we estimated the effects of bushfire PM10 and urban PM10, lagged up to 3 days.
We identified 32 days with extreme PM10 concentrations due to bushfires or vegetation-reduction burns. Although bushfire PM10 was consistently associated with respiratory hospital admissions, we found no consistent associations with cardiovascular admissions or with mortality. A 10 microg/m increase in bushfire PM10 was associated with a 1.24% (95% confidence interval = 0.22% to 2.27%) increase in all respiratory disease admissions (at lag 0), a 3.80% (1.40% to 6.26%) increase in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease admissions (at lag 2), and a 5.02% (1.77% to 8.37%) increase in adult asthma admissions (at lag 0). Urban PM10 was associated with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, as well as with cardiovascular and respiratory hospital admission, and these associations were not influenced by days with extreme PM10 concentrations.
PM10 from bushfires is associated primarily with respiratory morbidity, while PM10 from urban sources is associated with cardiorespiratory mortality and morbidity.
针对丛林大火(也称野火、生物质火或植被火)产生的颗粒物质对健康的影响,研究甚少,而且由于多种原因,此类暴露很可能会增加。本研究比较了 1994 年至 2002 年澳大利亚悉尼市的城市源颗粒物质与丛林大火衍生颗粒物质对每日死亡率和住院人数的影响。
在 PM10 浓度最高的日子里,我们假设 PM10 主要来自丛林大火。我们通过从周围天数估算的背景 PM10 浓度中减去这些日子的 PM1010 浓度来计算丛林大火 PM10 的贡献。我们假设其余日子的 PM10 来自通常的城市来源。我们实施了泊松模型,并采用基于引导的方法选择最佳平滑协变量函数,并估计了丛林大火 PM10 和城市 PM10 的影响,滞后时间最长可达 3 天。
我们发现了 32 天由于丛林大火或植被减少燃烧而导致的极端 PM10 浓度。尽管丛林大火 PM10 始终与呼吸道疾病住院有关,但我们未发现与心血管疾病住院或死亡率之间存在一致关联。PM10 浓度增加 10ug/m3 与所有呼吸道疾病住院的增加 1.24%(95%置信区间为 0.22%至 2.27%)(滞后 0 时)、慢性阻塞性肺病住院的增加 3.80%(1.40%至 6.26%)(滞后 2 时)和成人哮喘住院的增加 5.02%(1.77%至 8.37%)(滞后 0 时)相关。城市 PM10 与全因和心血管死亡率以及心血管和呼吸道疾病住院有关,这些关联不受极端 PM10 浓度天数的影响。
丛林大火产生的 PM10 主要与呼吸道疾病有关,而城市源 PM10 与心肺疾病死亡率和发病率有关。