• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经阴道无张力尿道中段悬吊术(TVT)和经闭孔无张力尿道中段悬吊术(TVT-O)治疗原发性压力性尿失禁的前瞻性随机试验。

TVT and TVT-O for surgical treatment of primary stress urinary incontinence: prospective randomized trial.

作者信息

Krofta Ladislav, Feyereisl Jaroslav, Otcenásek Michal, Velebil Petr, Kasíková Eva, Krcmár Michal

机构信息

Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Podolske nabrezi 157, 147 00, Prague 4, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Feb;21(2):141-8. doi: 10.1007/s00192-009-1027-2. Epub 2009 Nov 12.

DOI:10.1007/s00192-009-1027-2
PMID:19907913
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

A study was conducted to compare the efficacy and complications of TVT and TVT-O.

METHODS

This study is a prospective randomized trial involving 300 women with primary SUI; 149 received TVT, and 151 patients were treated with TVT-O. At the 1 year follow-up, 141 TVT patients and 147 TVT-O patients (dropout, 5.3% and 2.6%) were evaluated using urodynamic studies, validated questionnaires, and a 1-h pad test.

RESULTS

The mean operating time was shorter in the TVT-O group (p < 0.001). Urinary retention was not significantly different (p > 0.05). Inner thigh discomfort was reported by 5.4% of TVT-O patients. In the TVT and the TVT-O groups, respectively, 90.1% and 88.4% women were objectively cured. The satisfaction with the surgical outcome reflects the significant decrease in the questionnaire mean symptom scores in both groups. Postoperative de novo urgency was significantly more common in the TVT-O patients (p = 0.015).

CONCLUSION

The groups showed comparable objective and subjective cure rates.

摘要

引言与假设

开展了一项研究以比较经阴道无张力尿道中段吊带术(TVT)和经闭孔无张力尿道中段吊带术(TVT - O)的疗效及并发症。

方法

本研究为前瞻性随机试验,纳入300例原发性压力性尿失禁女性;149例接受TVT,151例接受TVT - O治疗。在1年随访时,对141例TVT患者和147例TVT - O患者(失访率分别为5.3%和2.6%)进行尿动力学研究、有效问卷评估及1小时尿垫试验。

结果

TVT - O组平均手术时间较短(p < 0.001)。尿潴留无显著差异(p > 0.05)。5.4%的TVT - O患者报告有大腿内侧不适。TVT组和TVT - O组分别有90.1%和88.4%的女性获得客观治愈。对手术结果的满意度反映在两组问卷平均症状评分均显著降低。TVT - O患者术后新发尿急明显更常见(p = 0.015)。

结论

两组的客观和主观治愈率相当。

相似文献

1
TVT and TVT-O for surgical treatment of primary stress urinary incontinence: prospective randomized trial.经阴道无张力尿道中段悬吊术(TVT)和经闭孔无张力尿道中段悬吊术(TVT-O)治疗原发性压力性尿失禁的前瞻性随机试验。
Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Feb;21(2):141-8. doi: 10.1007/s00192-009-1027-2. Epub 2009 Nov 12.
2
Comparison of the efficacy of tension-free vaginal tape obturator (TVT-O) and single-incision tension-free vaginal tape (Ajust™) in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a 1-year follow-up randomized trial.无张力阴道吊带闭孔术(TVT-O)与单切口无张力阴道吊带(Ajust™)治疗女性压力性尿失禁的疗效比较:一项为期1年的随访随机试验。
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Oct;27(10):1497-505. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3012-x. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
3
Single-incision sling compared with transobturator sling for treating stress urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial.单切口吊带与经闭孔吊带治疗压力性尿失禁的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Sep;24(9):1459-65. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-1998-2. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
4
Tension-free Vaginal Tape-Obturator for Treatment of Pure Urodynamic Stress Urinary Incontinence: Efficacy and Adverse Effects at 10-year Follow-up.经阴道无张力悬吊带(TVT-O)治疗单纯性尿动力学压力性尿失禁:10 年随访的疗效和不良反应。
Eur Urol. 2017 Apr;71(4):674-679. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.054. Epub 2016 Sep 3.
5
Comparison of three kinds of mid-urethral slings for surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence.三种经阴道无张力尿道中段悬吊带术治疗女性压力性尿失禁的比较
Urologia. 2010 Jan-Mar;77(1):37-41; discussion 42.
6
Outcome and sexual function after transobturator tape procedure versus tension-free vaginal tape SECUR: a randomized controlled trial.经闭孔尿道中段无张力吊带术与无张力阴道吊带术(SECUR)后的结局与性功能:一项随机对照试验
Menopause. 2014 Jun;21(6):641-5. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000119.
7
[Comparison of quality of life of patients treated for SUI by surgical approaches AJUST and TVT-O - a 3-month results from randomized trial].[AJUST手术方法与TVT-O手术治疗压力性尿失禁患者的生活质量比较——随机试验的3个月结果]
Ceska Gynekol. 2015 Jun;80(3):196-203.
8
Randomized controlled trial comparing TVT-O and TVT-S for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: 2-year results.比较经闭孔无张力尿道中段悬吊术(TVT-O)和耻骨后无张力尿道中段悬吊术(TVT-S)治疗压力性尿失禁的随机对照试验:2年结果
Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Oct;25(10):1343-8. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2352-7. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
9
3-Year follow-up of tension-free vaginal tape-ABBREVO procedure for the treatment of pure urodynamic stress urinary incontinence: efficacy and adverse effects.经阴道无张力吊带(ABBREVO)术治疗单纯性尿动力学压力性尿失禁的 3 年随访:疗效和不良反应。
Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Apr;31(4):739-744. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-04096-4. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
10
TVT-O for the treatment of pure urodynamic stress incontinence: efficacy, adverse effects, and prognostic factors at 5-year follow-up.经阴道尿道中段悬吊带术(TVT-O)治疗单纯性尿动力学压力性尿失禁:5 年随访时的疗效、不良反应和预后因素。
Eur Urol. 2013 May;63(5):872-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.12.022. Epub 2012 Dec 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Does Pre-Operative Grade of Stress Urinary Incontinence Severity Affect the Post-Operative Outcome? A Systematic Review.术前压力性尿失禁严重程度分级是否会影响术后结果?一项系统评价。
Int Urogynecol J. 2025 Sep 24. doi: 10.1007/s00192-025-06275-y.
2
Instruments Used for the Assessment of SUI Severity in Urogynecologic Surgical Trials: A Scoping Review.用于妇科泌尿外科学手术试验中压力性尿失禁严重程度评估的器械:一项范围综述
Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Dec;35(12):2255-2279. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05934-w. Epub 2024 Oct 19.
3
Innovative decision making tools using discrete mathematics for stress urinary incontinence treatment.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of TVT and TVT-O in patients with stress urinary incontinence: short-term cure rates and factors influencing the outcome. A prospective randomised study.压力性尿失禁患者经阴道无张力尿道中段吊带术(TVT)与经闭孔无张力尿道中段吊带术(TVT-O)的比较:短期治愈率及影响疗效的因素。一项前瞻性随机研究。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009 Feb;49(1):99-105. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2009.00957.x.
2
Eleven years prospective follow-up of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for treatment of stress urinary incontinence.无张力阴道吊带术治疗压力性尿失禁的11年前瞻性随访
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Aug;19(8):1043-7. doi: 10.1007/s00192-008-0666-z. Epub 2008 Jun 6.
3
使用离散数学进行创新性决策工具制定,以治疗压力性尿失禁。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 30;14(1):9900. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60407-w.
4
TVT versus TOT in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经阴道无张力尿道中段悬吊带术(TVT)与耻骨后尿道中段吊带术(TOT)治疗女性压力性尿失禁的系统评价和Meta分析
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2018 Nov 20;14:2293-2303. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S169014. eCollection 2018.
5
Surgical Treatment for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.女性压力性尿失禁的外科治疗:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2018 Aug;40(8):477-490. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1667184. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
6
Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women.女性压力性尿失禁的经尿道中段吊带手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 31;7(7):CD006375. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006375.pub4.
7
Comparison of the clinical outcomes of transobturator and single-incision slings for stress urinary incontinence.经闭孔吊带术与单切口吊带术治疗压力性尿失禁的临床疗效比较。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2016 Jul;32(7):367-72. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2016.05.013. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
8
Comparison between the retropubic and transobturator approaches in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness and complications.耻骨后途径与经闭孔途径治疗女性压力性尿失禁的比较:有效性和并发症的系统评价与荟萃分析
Int Braz J Urol. 2015 Mar-Apr;41(2):220-9. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.02.06.
9
Retropubic vs. transobturator tension-free vaginal tape for female stress urinary incontinence: 3-month results of a randomized controlled trial.耻骨后与经闭孔无张力阴道吊带术治疗女性压力性尿失禁:一项随机对照试验的3个月结果
Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Aug;25(8):1023-30. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2384-z. Epub 2014 May 13.
10
Operative shortening of the sling as a second-line treatment after TVT failure.在经阴道无张力尿道中段吊带术(TVT)失败后,手术缩短吊带作为二线治疗方法。
Cent European J Urol. 2011;64(3):159-61. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2011.03.art14. Epub 2011 Sep 6.
Transobturator tape compared with tension-free vaginal tape for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial.
经闭孔尿道中段悬吊带术与无张力阴道吊带术治疗压力性尿失禁的随机对照试验
Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Mar;111(3):611-21. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318162f22e.
4
The safety of the inside-out transobturator approach for transvaginal tape (TVT-O) treatment in stress urinary incontinence: French registry data on 984 women.经阴道无张力尿道中段吊带术(TVT-O)治疗压力性尿失禁的由内向外经闭孔入路的安全性:法国984名女性的登记数据
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 May;19(5):711-5. doi: 10.1007/s00192-007-0514-6. Epub 2008 Jan 15.
5
Incontinence-related quality of life and sexual function following the tension-free vaginal tape versus the "inside-out" tension-free vaginal tape obturator.无张力阴道吊带术与“由内向外”无张力阴道吊带闭孔术术后尿失禁相关生活质量及性功能对比
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Apr;19(4):481-7. doi: 10.1007/s00192-007-0482-x. Epub 2007 Oct 17.
6
Comparison of retropubic vs transobturator approach to midurethral slings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.耻骨后与经闭孔途径治疗中段尿道吊带术的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jul;197(1):3-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.09.025.
7
Transobturator and retropubic tape procedures in stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness and complications.压力性尿失禁的经闭孔和耻骨后吊带手术:有效性和并发症的系统评价与荟萃分析
BJOG. 2007 May;114(5):522-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01268.x. Epub 2007 Mar 16.
8
Peri-operative morbidity and early results of a randomised trial comparing TVT and TVT-O.一项比较经阴道无张力尿道中段悬吊术(TVT)和经闭孔无张力尿道中段悬吊术(TVT-O)的随机试验的围手术期发病率及早期结果
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007 Nov;18(11):1257-61. doi: 10.1007/s00192-007-0334-8. Epub 2007 Mar 8.
9
A prospective trial comparing tension-free vaginal tape and transobturator vaginal tape inside-out for the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: 1-year followup.一项比较无张力阴道吊带术和经闭孔阴道吊带术治疗女性压力性尿失禁的前瞻性试验:1年随访。
J Urol. 2007 Jan;177(1):214-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.063.
10
Transobturator tape (TOT): Two years follow-up.经闭孔吊带术(TOT):两年随访
Neurourol Urodyn. 2007;26(1):37-41. doi: 10.1002/nau.20353.