Suppr超能文献

尽管有先前使用硬探头的经验,但结肠镜超声检查仍存在学习现象。

Colonoscopic ultrasound is associated with a learning phenomenon despite previous rigid probe experience.

作者信息

Siriwardana Pulathis N, Hewavisenthi Shivanthi J De S, Pathmeswaran Arunasalam, Deen Kemal I

机构信息

Colombo South Teaching Hospital, Kalubowila, Sri Lanka.

出版信息

Indian J Gastroenterol. 2009 May-Jun;28(3):96-8. doi: 10.1007/s12664-009-0035-y. Epub 2009 Nov 12.

Abstract

Colonoscopic ultrasound (CUS) enables total colonoscopic examination combined with staging of tumor. Rigid probe transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) is reliable in assessing rectal cancer. Both the modalities are associated with an initial learning curve. We evaluated the predictability CUS in preoperative staging of rectal cancer during the learning curve, despite experience with TRUS. Forty-four patients with non-obstructing rectal cancer were assessed by colonoscopy and colonic ultrasound using a 7.5 MHz rotating transducer. Accuracy of ultrasound staging was compared with pathological staging. Tumor staging and nodal staging at pathology and ultrasound were named pT, pN and uT, uN, respectively. The pathological staging was pT1 in two (4.5%), pT2 in 16 (36%), pT3 in 21 (48%) and pT4 in five (11.5%) rectal cancer specimens. CUS understaged the tumor in 11 cases and overstaged it in 10 cases. Overall, the positive predictive value was 61%, negative predictive value 73%, sensitivity 61%, and specificity 73%. Lymph nodes were not visualized in 14. The overall un-weighted kappa of CUS staging of RC was 0.18 (poor). The predictive value in tumor staging of CUS is suboptimal in the learning phase, despite previous experience with TRUS.

摘要

结肠镜超声检查(CUS)可实现全结肠镜检查并结合肿瘤分期。硬探头经直肠超声检查(TRUS)在评估直肠癌方面可靠。这两种检查方式都存在初始学习曲线。尽管有TRUS检查经验,我们仍评估了CUS在学习曲线期间对直肠癌术前分期的预测性。44例非梗阻性直肠癌患者接受了结肠镜检查和使用7.5MHz旋转探头的结肠超声检查。将超声分期的准确性与病理分期进行比较。病理和超声检查时的肿瘤分期及淋巴结分期分别命名为pT、pN和uT、uN。在直肠癌标本中,病理分期为pT1的有2例(4.5%),pT2的有16例(36%),pT3的有21例(48%),pT4的有5例(11.5%)。CUS对肿瘤分期低估11例,高估10例。总体而言,阳性预测值为61%,阴性预测值为73%,敏感性为61%,特异性为73%。14例未发现淋巴结。CUS对直肠癌分期的总体未加权kappa值为0.18(较差)。尽管有TRUS检查经验,但在学习阶段CUS对肿瘤分期的预测价值仍不理想。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验