Jowers Center-HPER Department, Texas State University, 601 University Drive, San Marcos, TX 78666, USA.
J Sch Health. 2009 Dec;79(12):565-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2009.00450.x.
Given the growing scientific evidence against abstinence-only-until-marriage education, health educators are supporting an evidence-based approach to teaching sexuality education. However, there is still an abundance of federal support and funding streams allocated to sustain abstinence-only programs. This study assessed indicators that influence the adoption of abstinence-only-until-marriage education as well as school teachers' likelihood of adopting such programs.
Predictors included relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, and observability and were assessed with a self-administered, validated questionnaire. Additional questions were asked related to demographics, professional history, and abstinence-only-until-marriage education policies and funding. The relationships were tested with multiple regression analysis.
A trend became apparent in which most teachers would allow a state- or federally funded program to be offered and presented in their schools, but most did not know if their school received funding to support abstinence-only-until-marriage education. Attendance at religious services, complexity of abstinence-only-until-marriage programs, and abstinence-only-until-marriage curriculum emerged as important predictors of the likelihood to adopt abstinence education.
Trends in political agendas, policy development, and state and federal funding have supported abstinence-only-until-marriage education programs. In order to ensure an understanding about the inclusion of sexuality education in the classroom, insight into the teacher's role in the integration of sexuality education in the classroom is important.
鉴于越来越多的科学证据表明,仅禁欲直到结婚的教育方式并不奏效,健康教育工作者转而支持以证据为基础的方法来教授性教育。然而,仍有大量的联邦支持和资金流用于维持仅禁欲的项目。本研究评估了影响采用仅禁欲直到结婚的教育方式的指标,以及学校教师采用此类项目的可能性。
预测因素包括相对优势、兼容性、复杂性和可观察性,并通过自我管理的、经过验证的问卷进行评估。还询问了与人口统计学、专业历史以及仅禁欲直到结婚的教育政策和资金有关的问题。用多元回归分析检验了这些关系。
出现了一种趋势,即大多数教师允许在他们的学校提供和展示由州或联邦资助的项目,但大多数教师不知道他们的学校是否收到资金来支持仅禁欲直到结婚的教育。参加宗教服务、仅禁欲直到结婚项目的复杂性以及仅禁欲直到结婚的课程被认为是采用禁欲教育的重要预测因素。
政治议程、政策制定以及州和联邦资金的趋势支持了仅禁欲直到结婚的教育项目。为了确保理解在课堂中纳入性教育,了解教师在课堂中整合性教育的角色是很重要的。