• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乌干达贫困和农村居民卫生服务利用的变化:改革是否使穷人受益?

Changes in utilization of health services among poor and rural residents in Uganda: are reforms benefitting the poor?

机构信息

Department of Health Policy, Planning and Management, Makerere University School of Public Health, P,O, Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.

出版信息

Int J Equity Health. 2009 Nov 12;8:39. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-8-39.

DOI:10.1186/1475-9276-8-39
PMID:19909514
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2781807/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Uganda implemented health sector reforms to make services more accessible to the population. An assessment of the likely impact of these reforms is important for informing policy. This paper describes the changes in utilization of health services that occurred among the poor and those in rural areas between 2002/3 and 2005/6 and associated factors.

METHODS

Secondary data analysis was done using the socio-economic component of the Uganda National Household Surveys 2002/03 and 2005/06. The poor were identified from wealth quintiles constructed using an asset based index derived from Principal Components Analysis (PCA). The probability of choice of health care provider was assessed using multinomial logistic regression and multi-level statistical models.

RESULTS

The odds of not seeking care in 2005/6 were 1.79 times higher than in 2002/3 (OR = 1.79; 95% CI 1.65 - 1.94). The rural population experienced a 43% reduction in the risk of not seeking care because of poor geographical access (OR = 0.57; 95% CI 0.48 - 0.67). The risk of not seeking care due to high costs did not change significantly. Private for profit providers (PFP) were the major providers of services in 2002/3 and 2005/6. Using PFP as base category, respondents were more likely to have used private not for profit (PNFP) in 2005/6 than in 2002/3 (OR = 2.15; 95% CI 1.58 - 2.92), and also more likely to use public facilities in 2005/6 than 2002/3 (OR = 1.31; 95% CI 1.15 - 1.48). The most poor, females, rural residents, and those from elderly headed households were more likely to use public facilities relative to PFP.

CONCLUSION

Although overall utilization of public and PNFP services by rural and poor populations had increased, PFP remained the major source of care. The odds of not seeking care due to distance decreased in rural areas but cost continued to be an important barrier to seeking health services for residents from poor, rural, and elderly headed households. Policy makers should consider targeting subsidies to the poor and rural populations. Public private partnerships should be broadened to increase access to health services among the vulnerable.

摘要

背景

乌干达实施了卫生部门改革,以增加民众获得服务的机会。评估这些改革的潜在影响对于为政策提供信息很重要。本文描述了 2002/3 年至 2005/6 年间,贫困人群和农村地区的卫生服务利用情况发生的变化,以及相关因素。

方法

利用 2002/03 年和 2005/06 年乌干达国家住户调查的社会经济部分进行二次数据分析。使用基于主成分分析(PCA)得出的资产指数构建的财富五分位数来确定贫困人口。使用多项逻辑回归和多层次统计模型评估选择医疗服务提供者的概率。

结果

2005/6 年不寻求医疗服务的可能性比 2002/3 年高 1.79 倍(OR=1.79;95%CI 1.65-1.94)。农村地区由于地理位置不便而不寻求医疗服务的风险降低了 43%(OR=0.57;95%CI 0.48-0.67)。由于费用高而不寻求医疗服务的风险没有显著变化。私营营利性提供者(PFP)是 2002/3 年和 2005/6 年的主要服务提供者。以 PFP 为基础类别,与 2002/3 年相比,受访者在 2005/6 年更有可能使用私营非营利性提供者(PNFP)(OR=2.15;95%CI 1.58-2.92),也更有可能在 2005/6 年使用公共设施(OR=1.31;95%CI 1.15-1.48)。最贫困、女性、农村居民和老年人家庭的人更有可能使用公共设施,而不是 PFP。

结论

尽管农村和贫困人口对公共和 PNFP 服务的总体利用率有所增加,但 PFP 仍然是主要的服务来源。由于距离而不寻求医疗服务的可能性在农村地区有所下降,但费用仍然是贫困、农村和老年人家庭居民寻求医疗服务的一个重要障碍。政策制定者应考虑向贫困人口和农村人口提供补贴。应扩大公私伙伴关系,以增加弱势群体获得卫生服务的机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28cf/2781807/79c1177058f7/1475-9276-8-39-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28cf/2781807/e63e811a3adb/1475-9276-8-39-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28cf/2781807/79c1177058f7/1475-9276-8-39-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28cf/2781807/e63e811a3adb/1475-9276-8-39-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28cf/2781807/79c1177058f7/1475-9276-8-39-2.jpg

相似文献

1
Changes in utilization of health services among poor and rural residents in Uganda: are reforms benefitting the poor?乌干达贫困和农村居民卫生服务利用的变化:改革是否使穷人受益?
Int J Equity Health. 2009 Nov 12;8:39. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-8-39.
2
Health sector reforms and changes in prevalence of untreated morbidity, choice of healthcare providers among the poor and rural population in India.卫生部门改革与印度未治疗疾病发病率变化、贫困和农村人口对医疗服务提供者的选择。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2014 Apr 2;2(3):125-30. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2014.32. eCollection 2014 Apr.
3
The differential impacts of PEPFAR transition on private for-profit, private not-for-profit and publicly owned health facilities in Uganda.PEPFAR 过渡对乌干达私立营利性、私立非营利性和公立卫生机构的不同影响。
Health Policy Plan. 2020 Mar 1;35(2):133-141. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czz090.
4
Private and public health care in rural areas of Uganda.乌干达农村地区的私人和公共医疗保健。
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2010 Nov 24;10:29. doi: 10.1186/1472-698X-10-29.
5
The effect of wealth status on care seeking and health expenditures in Afghanistan.财富状况对阿富汗就医行为及医疗支出的影响。
Health Policy Plan. 2009 Jan;24(1):1-17. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czn043. Epub 2008 Dec 5.
6
Public-private mix for TB and TB-HIV care in Lagos, Nigeria.尼日利亚拉各斯的结核病和结核病-艾滋病防治公私混合模式。
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2013 Sep;17(9):1195-8. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.12.0759.
7
Health care provider choice: the North West Province of Cameroon.医疗服务提供者的选择:喀麦隆西北省
Int J Health Plann Manage. 1996 Jan-Mar;11(1):53-67. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1751(199601)11:1<53::AID-HPM413>3.0.CO;2-A.
8
An exploration of the socio-economic profile of women and costs of receiving abortion services at public health facilities of Madhya Pradesh, India.对印度中央邦公共卫生设施中接受堕胎服务的妇女的社会经济概况及费用的探索。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Mar 21;17(1):223. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2159-6.
9
Quality of care in contraceptive services provided to young people in two Ugandan districts: a simulated client study.在乌干达两个地区提供给年轻人的避孕服务的质量:一项模拟客户研究。
PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e27908. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027908. Epub 2011 Nov 21.
10
Rural Indian women's care-seeking behavior and choice of provider for gynecological symptoms.印度农村妇女针对妇科症状的就医行为及医疗服务提供者的选择
Stud Fam Plann. 2003 Sep;34(3):173-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2003.00173.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Is the national health insurance scheme a pathway to sustained access to medicines in Nigeria?国家健康保险计划是否是尼日利亚持续获得药物的途径?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Mar 29;24(1):403. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10827-1.
2
"These are just finishing our medicines": older persons' perceptions and experiences of access to healthcare in public and private health facilities in Uganda.“这些只是我们的药快用完了”:乌干达老年人对在公立和私立医疗机构获得医疗保健的看法和体验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Mar 29;24(1):396. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10741-6.
3
How Poor Is Your Sample? A Simple Approach for Estimating the Relative Economic Status of Small and Nonrepresentative Samples.

本文引用的文献

1
Poverty and access to health care in developing countries.发展中国家的贫困与医疗保健服务可及性
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1136:161-71. doi: 10.1196/annals.1425.011. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
2
Treatment-seeking behaviour, cost burdens and coping strategies among rural and urban households in Coastal Kenya: an equity analysis.肯尼亚沿海地区农村和城市家庭的就医行为、成本负担及应对策略:一项公平性分析
Trop Med Int Health. 2007 May;12(5):673-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2007.01825.x.
3
Improving facility-based care for sick children in Uganda: training is not enough.
你的样本有多贫困?一种简单的方法可用于估算小型和非代表性样本的相对经济地位。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2023 Apr 28;11(2). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00394.
4
Trends in inequality in maternal and child health and health care in Uganda: Analysis of the Uganda demographic and health surveys.乌干达母婴健康和医疗保健不平等趋势:乌干达人口与健康调查分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Oct 20;22(1):1269. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08630-x.
5
Taking Opportunities, Taking Medicines: Antibiotic Use in Rural Eastern Uganda.抓住机会,合理用药:乌干达东部农村的抗生素使用情况。
Med Anthropol. 2022 May-Jun;41(4):418-430. doi: 10.1080/01459740.2022.2047676. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
6
Tale of 22 cities: utilisation patterns and content of maternal care in large African cities.22 个城市的故事:大型非洲城市的孕产妇护理利用模式和内容。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Mar;7(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007803.
7
Healthworker preparedness for COVID-19 management and implementation experiences: a mixed methods study in Uganda's refugee-hosting districts.卫生工作者对COVID-19管理的准备情况及实施经验:乌干达难民收容区的一项混合方法研究
Confl Health. 2021 Nov 3;15(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s13031-021-00415-z.
8
Delays in emergency department intervention for patients with traumatic brain injury in Uganda.乌干达创伤性脑损伤患者在急诊科接受干预的延迟情况。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2021 Aug 26;6(1):e000674. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2021-000674. eCollection 2021.
9
Geospatial analysis of distribution of community pharmacies and other health care facilities providing minor ailments services in Malaysia.马来西亚社区药房及其他提供小病诊疗服务的医疗保健机构分布的地理空间分析。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2021 Feb 24;14(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s40545-021-00308-9.
10
Pay-it-forward gonorrhoea and chlamydia testing among men who have sex with men in China: a randomised controlled trial.中国男男性行为者中淋病和衣原体检测的“传递爱心”模式:一项随机对照试验
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Aug;20(8):976-982. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30172-9. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
改善乌干达患病儿童的机构化护理:培训是不够的。
Health Policy Plan. 2005 Dec;20 Suppl 1:i58-i68. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czi051.
4
Improving access for the poorest to public sector health services: insights from Kirivong Operational Health District in Cambodia.改善最贫困人口获得公共部门医疗服务的机会:来自柬埔寨基里翁运营卫生区的见解。
Health Policy Plan. 2006 Jan;21(1):27-39. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czj001. Epub 2005 Nov 17.
5
Understanding the impact of eliminating user fees: utilization and catastrophic health expenditures in Uganda.了解取消用户费用的影响:乌干达的医疗服务利用情况和灾难性医疗支出
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Feb;62(4):866-76. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.07.004. Epub 2005 Sep 1.
6
Inequities in healthcare seeking in the treatment of communicable endemic diseases in Southeast Nigeria.尼日利亚东南部传染性地方病治疗中就医方面的不平等现象。
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Jul;61(2):455-63. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.066. Epub 2005 Jan 25.
7
User fees in private non-for-profit hospitals in Uganda: a survey and intervention for equity.乌干达私立非营利性医院的使用者付费情况:一项关于公平性的调查与干预措施
Int J Equity Health. 2005 May 4;4(1):6. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-4-6.
8
Abolition of cost-sharing is pro-poor: evidence from Uganda.取消费用分担有利于穷人:来自乌干达的证据。
Health Policy Plan. 2005 Mar;20(2):100-8. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czi012.
9
Discontinuation of cost sharing in Uganda.乌干达取消费用分担。
Bull World Health Organ. 2004 Mar;82(3):187-95. Epub 2004 Apr 16.
10
Overcoming barriers to health service access: influencing the demand side.克服医疗服务获取障碍:影响需求方。
Health Policy Plan. 2004 Mar;19(2):69-79. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czh009.