Turillazzi Emanuela, Fineschi Vittorio
Department of Legal Medicine, University of Foggia, Ospedale Colonnello D'Avanzo, Via degli Aviatori 1, 71100 Foggia, Italy.
BMC Med Ethics. 2009 Nov 12;10:19. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-10-19.
Multidisciplinary study groups have produced documents in an attempt to support decisions regarding whether to resuscitate "at risk" newborns or not. Moreover, there has been an increasingly insistent request for juridical regulation of neonatal resuscitation practices as well as for clarification of the role of parents in decisions regarding this kind of assistance. The crux of the matter is whether strict guidelines, reference standards based on the parameter of gestational age and authority rules are necessary.
The Italian scenario reflects the current animated debate, illustrating the difficulty intrinsic in rigid guidelines on the subject, especially when gestational age is taken as a reference parameter for the medical decision.
Concerning the decision to interrupt or not to initiate resuscitation procedures on low gestational age newborns, physicians do not need rigid rules based on inflexible gestational age and birth weight guidelines. Guidance in addressing the difficult and trying issues associated with infants born at the margins of viability with a realistic assessment of the infant's clinical condition must be based on the infant's best interests, with clinicians and parents entering into what has been described as a "partnership of care".
多学科研究小组已制定文件,试图为有关是否对“高危”新生儿进行复苏的决策提供支持。此外,对于新生儿复苏实践的司法监管以及明确父母在这类救助决策中的作用的要求也越来越强烈。问题的关键在于是否需要严格的指导方针、基于胎龄参数的参考标准和权威规则。
意大利的情况反映了当前热烈的辩论,说明了在这个问题上制定严格指导方针存在的内在困难,尤其是当将胎龄作为医疗决策的参考参数时。
关于对低胎龄新生儿中断或不启动复苏程序的决策,医生不需要基于僵化的胎龄和出生体重指导方针的严格规则。在对婴儿的临床状况进行现实评估的基础上,处理与处于存活边缘的婴儿相关的困难和棘手问题时的指导,必须基于婴儿的最大利益,临床医生和父母要建立起所谓的“护理伙伴关系”。