Suppr超能文献

你多大了?在意大利的辩论中,新生儿胎龄影响新生儿复苏实践。

How old are you? Newborn gestational age discriminates neonatal resuscitation practices in the Italian debate.

作者信息

Turillazzi Emanuela, Fineschi Vittorio

机构信息

Department of Legal Medicine, University of Foggia, Ospedale Colonnello D'Avanzo, Via degli Aviatori 1, 71100 Foggia, Italy.

出版信息

BMC Med Ethics. 2009 Nov 12;10:19. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-10-19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Multidisciplinary study groups have produced documents in an attempt to support decisions regarding whether to resuscitate "at risk" newborns or not. Moreover, there has been an increasingly insistent request for juridical regulation of neonatal resuscitation practices as well as for clarification of the role of parents in decisions regarding this kind of assistance. The crux of the matter is whether strict guidelines, reference standards based on the parameter of gestational age and authority rules are necessary.

DISCUSSION

The Italian scenario reflects the current animated debate, illustrating the difficulty intrinsic in rigid guidelines on the subject, especially when gestational age is taken as a reference parameter for the medical decision.

SUMMARY

Concerning the decision to interrupt or not to initiate resuscitation procedures on low gestational age newborns, physicians do not need rigid rules based on inflexible gestational age and birth weight guidelines. Guidance in addressing the difficult and trying issues associated with infants born at the margins of viability with a realistic assessment of the infant's clinical condition must be based on the infant's best interests, with clinicians and parents entering into what has been described as a "partnership of care".

摘要

背景

多学科研究小组已制定文件,试图为有关是否对“高危”新生儿进行复苏的决策提供支持。此外,对于新生儿复苏实践的司法监管以及明确父母在这类救助决策中的作用的要求也越来越强烈。问题的关键在于是否需要严格的指导方针、基于胎龄参数的参考标准和权威规则。

讨论

意大利的情况反映了当前热烈的辩论,说明了在这个问题上制定严格指导方针存在的内在困难,尤其是当将胎龄作为医疗决策的参考参数时。

总结

关于对低胎龄新生儿中断或不启动复苏程序的决策,医生不需要基于僵化的胎龄和出生体重指导方针的严格规则。在对婴儿的临床状况进行现实评估的基础上,处理与处于存活边缘的婴儿相关的困难和棘手问题时的指导,必须基于婴儿的最大利益,临床医生和父母要建立起所谓的“护理伙伴关系”。

相似文献

4
Tough Decisions for Premature Triplets.早产三胞胎面临的艰难抉择。
Pediatrics. 2016 Feb;137(2):e20153804. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-3804. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
6
Children's Right to Health: Implications for Decision-Making in Newborn Medical Care.
Pediatrics. 2016 Jul;138(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-4195. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
9
Borderline viability: controversies in caring for the extremely premature infant.边缘生存能力:照顾极早产儿的争议
Clin Perinatol. 2014 Dec;41(4):799-814. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2014.08.005. Epub 2014 Sep 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Flaws in the assessment of the best interests of the newborn.
Acta Paediatr. 2009 Apr;98(4):613-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2008.01185.x. Epub 2009 Jan 22.
5
Extremely preterm births: recommendations for treatment in European countries.极早早产:欧洲国家的治疗建议。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2008 Nov;93(6):F403-6. doi: 10.1136/adc.2008.140871. Epub 2008 Aug 1.
6
Decisions for life made in the perinatal period: who decides and on which standards?围产期做出的人生决策:谁来决定以及依据何种标准?
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2008 Sep;93(5):F332-5. doi: 10.1136/adc.2006.113373. Epub 2008 Jun 18.
10
Neurodevelopmental outcomes of preterm infants.早产儿的神经发育结局
Curr Opin Neurol. 2008 Apr;21(2):123-8. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e3282f88bb4.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验