Rom W N, Travis W D, Brody A R
Department of Medicine, Bellevue Hospital, New York University Medical Center, NY 10016.
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991 Feb;143(2):408-22. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/143.2.408.
Asbestosis is an inflammatory and fibrotic process of the alveolar structures mediated, at least in part, by cytokines released by "activated" alveolar macrophages. The process of phagocytosis and "activation" of alveolar macrophages is poorly understood. Are all macrophages activated or only subpopulations? Which cytokines are up-regulated? How does the local milieu modulate profibrotic and antifibrotic mediators? Is protein release accompanied by up-regulation of gene transcription? Is there an ordered sequence of cytokine activity? What roles do neutrophils and lymphocytes play? How can disease progression best be quantified absent further exposure? Answers to these questions are important to direct rational strategies at interdicting the fibrotic process. The question of cancer and asbestos is more vexing. The processes of inflammation, fibrosis, and carcinogenesis appear to be closely intertwined. For example, proto-oncogenes such as c-sis (PDGF B-chain) are up-regulated in activated alveolar macrophages from fibrotic lungs; these and possibly others may play an important role in asbestos carcinogenesis. Second, asbestos can transfect DNA into cells. Furthermore, DNA can adhere to asbestos fibers, and these fibers are capable of direct transmigration into cells. The questions of the mechanisms of cigarette smoke cocarcinogenicity and latency remain. Lastly, if the bronchial epithelium is highly metaplastic throughout from cigarette smoking, what triggers a single (or several) nidus of cells to transform into carcinoma? Malignant mesothelioma poses the most challenging questions because of association with brief asbestos exposure by history. Mesothelial cells are susceptible to minute environmental manipulations, and changes occur after exposure to all fiber types. Yet epidemiologic studies point toward long amphiboles as having greater mesothelioma risk. To test this hypothesis, experimental data must be generated differentiating tumorigenesis risk from short, chrysotile fibers that can migrate to the parietal pleura from the associations of long amphiboles persisting in lung tissue. Despite the future decreasing numbers of clinical cases of asbestos-related disease, solving the important mechanistic questions remaining will contribute significantly to our understanding of fibrosis and cancer.
石棉肺是一种肺泡结构的炎症和纤维化过程,至少部分由“活化”肺泡巨噬细胞释放的细胞因子介导。肺泡巨噬细胞的吞噬作用和“活化”过程尚不清楚。是所有巨噬细胞都被活化,还是只有亚群被活化?哪些细胞因子上调?局部环境如何调节促纤维化和抗纤维化介质?蛋白质释放是否伴随着基因转录上调?细胞因子活性是否有一个有序的序列?中性粒细胞和淋巴细胞起什么作用?在没有进一步接触的情况下,如何最好地量化疾病进展?这些问题的答案对于指导阻断纤维化过程的合理策略很重要。癌症与石棉的问题更令人困扰。炎症、纤维化和致癌过程似乎紧密相连。例如,原癌基因如c-sis(血小板衍生生长因子B链)在纤维化肺的活化肺泡巨噬细胞中上调;这些以及其他可能的基因可能在石棉致癌过程中起重要作用。其次,石棉可以将DNA转染到细胞中。此外,DNA可以附着在石棉纤维上,这些纤维能够直接迁移到细胞中。香烟烟雾的协同致癌机制和潜伏期问题仍然存在。最后,如果支气管上皮因吸烟而普遍高度化生,是什么触发单个(或几个)细胞巢转化为癌?恶性间皮瘤由于与既往短暂接触石棉有关,提出了最具挑战性的问题。间皮细胞对微小的环境变化敏感,接触所有纤维类型后都会发生变化。然而,流行病学研究表明,长纤维闪石导致间皮瘤的风险更大。为了验证这一假设,必须生成实验数据,以区分短的温石棉纤维迁移到壁层胸膜的致瘤风险与长期存在于肺组织中的长纤维闪石的致瘤风险。尽管未来与石棉相关疾病的临床病例数量会减少,但解决剩下的重要机制问题将极大地有助于我们对纤维化和癌症的理解。