Suppr超能文献

物理疗法治疗脊髓损伤患者神经性疼痛的疗效如何?

What is the efficacy of physical therapeutics for treating neuropathic pain in spinal cord injury patients?

机构信息

Centre mutualiste neurologique, Propara, 263, rue du Caducée, 34090 Montpellier, France.

出版信息

Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2009 Mar;52(2):149-66. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2008.12.006. Epub 2009 Feb 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the place and level of proof of physical therapeutics for treating neuropathic pain in spinal cord injury (SCI) patients.

METHOD

Literature review from three databases: PubMed, Embase, Pascal. The following keywords were selected: chronic neuropathic pain/non-pharmacological treatment; transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, physiotherapy, acupuncture, physical therapy, transcranial magnetic stimulation, heat therapy, ice therapy, cold therapy, massage, ultrasound, alternative treatment, complementary treatment, occupational therapy. The articles were analyzed using the double-reading mode.

RESULTS

Three techniques emerge from the literature: magnetic or electrical transcranial stimulation, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and acupuncture. Even though the first method is not easily accessible on a daily basis it is the one that yields the most promising results validated by Grade B studies. Healthcare professionals remain faithful to pain-relieving transcutaneous neurostimulation for both segmental neuropathic pain and below-level central neuropathic pain. Acupuncture is advocated by Canadian teams and could offer some interesting options; however, to this day, it does not have the methodological support and framework required to validate its efficacy. All other physical therapies are used in a random way. Only below-level massages are advocated by the patients themselves.

CONCLUSION

To this day, no study can validate the integration of physical therapy as part of the array of therapeutics used for treating neuropathic pain in SCI patients. In the future, it will require controlled and randomized therapeutic studies on homogenous groups of SCI patients, to control the various confusion factors.

摘要

目的

评估物理疗法在治疗脊髓损伤(SCI)患者神经性疼痛中的地位和证据水平。

方法

从三个数据库(PubMed、Embase、Pascal)中进行文献回顾。选择了以下关键词:慢性神经性疼痛/非药物治疗;经皮神经电刺激、物理疗法、针灸、物理治疗、经颅磁刺激、热疗、冰敷、冷疗、按摩、超声、替代疗法、补充疗法、职业疗法。使用双阅读模式对文章进行分析。

结果

文献中出现了三种技术:磁或电经颅刺激、经皮神经电刺激和针灸。尽管第一种方法在日常生活中不易获得,但它是最有前途的方法,得到了 B 级研究的验证。医疗保健专业人员仍然坚持使用止痛经皮神经刺激治疗节段性神经性疼痛和低于水平的中枢神经性疼痛。针灸得到了加拿大团队的支持,并可能提供一些有趣的选择;然而,迄今为止,它没有得到验证其疗效所需的方法学支持和框架。所有其他物理疗法都是随机使用的。只有低于水平的按摩受到患者自己的提倡。

结论

到目前为止,没有研究可以验证将物理疗法作为治疗 SCI 患者神经性疼痛的治疗方法之一。未来,需要对同质的 SCI 患者群体进行对照和随机治疗研究,以控制各种混淆因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验