Exercise Metabolism Research Group, Dept. of Kinesiology, McMaster Univ., Hamilton, ON L8S4K1 Canada.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2010 Jan;108(1):60-7. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01147.2009. Epub 2009 Nov 12.
The aim of our study was to determine whether resistance exercise-induced elevations in endogenous hormones enhance muscle strength and hypertrophy with training. Twelve healthy young men (21.8 +/- 1.2 yr, body mass index = 23.1 +/- 0.6 kg/m(2)) trained their elbow flexors independently for 15 wk on separate days and under different hormonal milieu. In one training condition, participants performed isolated arm curl exercise designed to maintain basal hormone concentrations (low hormone, LH); in the other training condition, participants performed identical arm exercise to the LH condition followed immediately by a high volume of leg resistance exercise to elicit a large increase in endogenous hormones (high hormone, HH). There was no elevation in serum growth hormone (GH), insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1), or testosterone after the LH protocol but significant (P < 0.001) elevations in these hormones immediately and 15 and 30 min after the HH protocol. The hormone responses elicited by each respective exercise protocol late in the training period were similar to the response elicited early in the training period, indicating that a divergent postexercise hormone response was maintained over the training period. Muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) increased by 12% in LH and 10% in HH (P < 0.001) with no difference between conditions (condition x training interaction, P = 0.25). Similarly, type I (P < 0.01) and type II (P < 0.001) muscle fiber CSA increased with training with no effect of hormone elevation in the HH condition. Strength increased in both arms, but the increase was not different between the LH and HH conditions. We conclude that exposure of loaded muscle to acute exercise-induced elevations in endogenous anabolic hormones enhances neither muscle hypertrophy nor strength with resistance training in young men.
我们的研究目的是确定阻力训练引起的内源性激素升高是否能增强肌肉力量和训练后的肥大。12 名健康的年轻男性(21.8 +/- 1.2 岁,体重指数 = 23.1 +/- 0.6 kg/m(2)) 在不同的激素环境下,分别在 15 周内独立训练他们的肘部屈肌。在一种训练条件下,参与者进行单独的手臂卷曲运动,旨在维持基础激素浓度(低激素,LH);在另一种训练条件下,参与者进行与 LH 条件相同的手臂运动,随后立即进行大量腿部阻力运动,以引起内源性激素的大量增加(高激素,HH)。LH 方案后血清生长激素(GH)、胰岛素样生长因子(IGF-1)或睾酮没有升高,但 HH 方案后立即以及 15 和 30 分钟后这些激素明显升高(P < 0.001)。在训练后期,每个特定运动方案引起的激素反应与训练早期引起的反应相似,表明在整个训练期间保持了不同的运动后激素反应。LH 组的肌肉横截面积(CSA)增加了 12%,HH 组增加了 10%(P < 0.001),两组之间没有差异(条件 x 训练交互作用,P = 0.25)。同样,I 型(P < 0.01)和 II 型(P < 0.001)肌纤维 CSA 随着训练而增加,HH 条件下激素升高没有影响。双臂力量都增加了,但 LH 和 HH 条件之间没有差异。我们得出结论,在年轻男性进行抗阻训练时,使负重肌肉暴露于急性运动引起的内源性合成代谢激素升高既不能增强肌肉肥大也不能增强肌肉力量。