Carrau R L, Byzakis J, Wagner R L, Johnson J T
Department of Otolaryngology-Eye and Ear Institute, University of Pittsburgh Pa.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991 Feb;117(2):194-5. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1991.01870140082011.
The use of perioperative prophylactic antibiotics in uncontaminated head and neck surgery remains controversial. We performed a retrospective analysis of 192 patients undergoing uncontaminated neck dissections from 1976 to 1989. Wound infection developed in 10% (10/99) of patients who did not receive antibiotics, while only three (3.3%) of 93 patients who received antibiotics developed infections. This difference was not statistically significant. We correlated the use of flaps, length of surgery, prior radiation treatment, and postoperative complications with rate of wound infection. The difference was not statistically significant for any of these variables. Our beta error was, however, greater than 0.2. Our data do not demonstrate efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics in uncontaminated neck dissections with statistical significance; however, a trend exists suggesting its possible value.
在无污染的头颈外科手术中使用围手术期预防性抗生素仍存在争议。我们对1976年至1989年间接受无污染颈部清扫术的192例患者进行了回顾性分析。未接受抗生素治疗的患者中10%(10/99)发生了伤口感染,而接受抗生素治疗的93例患者中只有3例(3.3%)发生了感染。这种差异无统计学意义。我们将皮瓣的使用、手术时间、既往放疗以及术后并发症与伤口感染率进行了关联分析。这些变量中的任何一个差异均无统计学意义。然而,我们的Ⅱ类错误大于0.2。我们的数据未显示预防性抗生素在无污染颈部清扫术中具有统计学意义上的疗效;不过,存在一种趋势表明其可能具有价值。