Blair E A, Johnson J T, Wagner R L, Carrau R L, Bizakis J G
Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, Pa.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995 Mar;121(3):269-71. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1995.01890030011002.
This study was undertaken to assess the excess cost of hospitalization accrued to patients who develop postoperative wound infection following neck dissection in which the wound was not exposed to secretions from the upper aerodigestive tract.
A retrospective cohort of patients who underwent "clean" neck dissection from 1976 to 1989 were evaluated. Antibiotic administration (yes or no), post-operative wound infection (yes or no), and duration and cost of hospitalization were assessed.
All surgeries were performed in a university medical center.
All patients underwent neck dissection in which the procedure was clean, ie, there was no exposure to secretions from the upper aerodigestive tract.
Patients were assessed to determine administration of antibiotics (yes or no), development of postoperative wound infection (yes or no), and duration and cost of hospitalization.
Wound infection developed in 10 (10%) of 99 patients who did not receive antibiotics. Of 93 patients who received perioperative antibiotics, three (3.3%) developed wound infection. This difference was not statistically significant. The type II (beta) error was greater than 0.2, suggesting that a significant difference may have been missed (false-negative) as a result of the small number of patients studied. The excess cost accrued to each patient who developed a postoperative wound infection was in excess of $36,000 (1992 dollars). The cost of administration of antibiotic prophylaxis to 100 patients is less than this amount.
The decision to withhold antibiotic prophylaxis should not be made in an effort to reduce hospital costs.
本研究旨在评估在伤口未暴露于上呼吸道消化道分泌物的颈部清扫术后发生手术伤口感染的患者所产生的额外住院费用。
对1976年至1989年接受“清洁”颈部清扫术的患者进行回顾性队列研究。评估抗生素使用情况(是或否)、术后伤口感染情况(是或否)以及住院时间和费用。
所有手术均在大学医学中心进行。
所有患者均接受了清洁的颈部清扫术,即伤口未暴露于上呼吸道消化道分泌物。
评估患者的抗生素使用情况(是或否)、术后伤口感染的发生情况(是或否)以及住院时间和费用。
99例未接受抗生素治疗的患者中有10例(10%)发生伤口感染。93例接受围手术期抗生素治疗的患者中有3例(3.3%)发生伤口感染。这种差异无统计学意义。II型(β)错误大于0.2,表明由于研究患者数量较少,可能遗漏了显著差异(假阴性)。术后发生伤口感染的每位患者产生的额外费用超过36,000美元(1992年美元)。对100例患者进行抗生素预防性给药的费用低于此金额。
不应为了降低医院成本而决定不进行抗生素预防性给药。