Leibniz Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, TU Dortmund University, Ardeystr. 67, 44139 Dortmund, Germany.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010 Mar;108(4):719-26. doi: 10.1007/s00421-009-1282-4.
A previous study where the delay of the circadian system was induced by bright light that was adjusted to the individual melatonin onset revealed concomitant alterations of the cortisol quiescent period that correlated inversely with morningness. This meta-analysis focuses on the question whether this applies to experimental shift work with fixed light schedules. The analysis bases on data from three laboratory studies where healthy young men [18 evening-, 20 neither-, 11 morning types (MT)] performed three consecutive day shifts and then three consecutive night shifts. Phase assessment procedures were performed after every three shifts to ascertain the diurnal melatonin profile for the quantification of the phase shift and the diurnal cortisol profile for the determination of the cortisol quiescent period. Work was done in 150-200 lx but phase delays were promoted by bright light (1,500-2,000 lx) either by 4-h pulses in the first part of the night or by continuous exposure during the whole night shifts. These different light scenarios caused similar phase delays. Morningness was inversely related to the phase delay and to the alteration of the cortisol quiescent period. The latter became shorter in morning and longer in evening types. Thus, MT are disadvantaged, even if treated with bright light. This suggests that morning-oriented career shift workers might have a higher health risk. These results need to be replicated by directed studies and verified by epidemiological studies.
先前的一项研究通过调整个体褪黑素出现时间的亮光来延迟生物钟,结果发现皮质醇静止期也发生了相应的改变,且与早晨型呈负相关。本荟萃分析主要关注的问题是,这种改变是否适用于固定光照时间表的实验性轮班工作。该分析基于三项实验室研究的数据,其中健康的年轻男性[18 名夜间型、20 名非夜间型和 11 名早晨型(MT)]连续执行三个白班和三个夜班。每完成三个班次后,进行相位评估程序,以确定昼夜褪黑素曲线以量化相位偏移,以及昼夜皮质醇曲线以确定皮质醇静止期。工作环境的光照强度为 150-200 lx,但通过在夜间的前半部分给予 4 小时的强光脉冲或在整个夜班期间持续暴露,促进了相位延迟。这些不同的光照场景导致了相似的相位延迟。早晨型与相位延迟和皮质醇静止期的改变呈负相关。后者在早晨型和晚上型中变得更短和更长。因此,即使接受强光治疗,早晨型的人也处于劣势。这表明,以早晨为导向的职业轮班工人可能面临更高的健康风险。这些结果需要通过定向研究来复制,并通过流行病学研究来验证。