School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, PR China.
Sci Total Environ. 2010 Feb 1;408(5):1050-8. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.10.056. Epub 2009 Nov 13.
Ultra low sulfur diesel and two different kinds of biodiesel fuels blended with baseline diesel fuel in 5% and 20% v/v were tested in a Cummins 4BTA direct injection diesel engine, with a turbocharger and an intercooler. Experiments were conducted under five engine loads at two steady speeds (1500 rpm and 2500 rpm). The study aims at investigating the engine performance, NO(x) emission, smoke opacity, PM composition, PM size distribution and comparing the impacts of low sulfur content of biodiesel with ULSD on the particulate emission. The results indicate that, compared to base diesel fuel, the increase of biodiesel in blends could cause certain increase in both brake specific fuel consumption and brake thermal efficiency. Compared with baseline diesel fuel, the biodiesel blends bring about more NO(x) emissions. With the proportion of biodiesel increase in blends, the smoke opacity decreases, while total particle number concentration increases. Meanwhile the ULSD gives lower NO(x) emissions, smoke opacity and total number concentration than those of baseline diesel fuel. In addition, the percentages of SOF and sulfate in particulates increase with biodiesel in blends, while the dry soot friction decreases obviously. Compared with baseline diesel fuel, the biodiesel blends increase the total nucleation number concentration, while ULSD reduces the total nucleation number concentration effectively, although they all have lower sulfur content. It means that, for ULSD, the lower sulfur content is the dominant factor for suppressing nucleation particles formation, while for biodiesel blends, lower volatile, lower aromatic content and higher oxygen content of biodiesel are key factors for improving the nucleation particles formation. The results demonstrate that the higher NO(x) emission and total nucleation number concentration are considered as the big obstacles of the application of biodiesel in diesel engine.
超低硫柴油和两种不同的生物柴油燃料分别以 5%和 20%的体积混合在基线柴油燃料中,在带有涡轮增压器和中冷器的康明斯 4BTA 直喷式柴油机中进行了测试。在两个稳定速度(1500rpm 和 2500rpm)下,在五个发动机负荷下进行了实验。本研究旨在研究发动机性能、NO(x)排放、烟雾不透明度、PM 成分、PM 粒径分布,并比较低硫生物柴油与 ULSD 对颗粒物排放的影响。结果表明,与基础柴油相比,混合燃料中生物柴油的增加会导致比燃油消耗率和制动热效率一定程度的增加。与基础柴油相比,生物柴油混合物会产生更多的 NO(x)排放。随着混合物中生物柴油比例的增加,烟雾不透明度降低,而总颗粒数浓度增加。同时,ULSD 比基线柴油燃料产生的 NO(x)排放量、烟雾不透明度和总颗粒数浓度更低。此外,与基线柴油相比,混合燃料中生物柴油的比例增加,导致颗粒物中的 SOF 和硫酸盐百分比增加,而干碳烟摩擦明显降低。与基线柴油相比,生物柴油混合物增加了总成核数浓度,而 ULSD 则有效地降低了总成核数浓度,尽管它们的硫含量都较低。这意味着,对于 ULSD,较低的硫含量是抑制成核颗粒形成的主要因素,而对于生物柴油混合物,较低的挥发性、较低的芳香性和较高的生物柴油含氧量是改善成核颗粒形成的关键因素。结果表明,较高的 NO(x)排放和总成核数浓度被认为是生物柴油在柴油机中应用的主要障碍。