• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

DSM-IV E 和 F 标准在 PTSD 自评评估中的重要性。

The importance of the DSM-IV E and F criteria in self-report assessments of PTSD.

机构信息

University of North Texas, Denton, TX 76203, United States.

出版信息

J Anxiety Disord. 2010 Jan;24(1):161-6. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.10.004.

DOI:10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.10.004
PMID:19913383
Abstract

The purpose of the current study was to examine the DSM-IV E and F criteria when using self-report measures of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). According to DSM-IV there are six core criteria required for a PTSD diagnosis including specific trauma characteristics, re-experiencing, avoidance, hyperarousal, duration, and impairment level. The Impact of Events Scale (IES) is a widely used self-report measure designed to measure PTSD symptoms. It has recently been suggested that the IES may produce misleading results, making emotional reactions to obviously non-traumatic events look like PTSD. In two separate studies, when duration (E criterion) and subjective impairment (F criterion) were included, the rates of those meeting PTSD criteria dropped from 20% to 3%. In addition, only 30% of events identified by a trauma history questionnaire met the DSM-IV definition of a traumatic event. The results have implications for the use of self-report measures in the assessment of PTSD.

摘要

本研究旨在考察使用创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)自评量表时DSM-IV 的 E 和 F 标准。根据 DSM-IV,PTSD 诊断需要符合六个核心标准,包括特定的创伤特征、再体验、回避、过度警觉、持续时间和损伤程度。事件影响量表(IES)是一种广泛使用的自评量表,用于测量 PTSD 症状。最近有人提出,IES 可能会产生误导性结果,使对明显非创伤性事件的情绪反应看起来像 PTSD。在两项独立的研究中,当包括持续时间(E 标准)和主观损伤(F 标准)时,符合 PTSD 标准的比例从 20%降至 3%。此外,创伤史问卷确定的只有 30%的事件符合 DSM-IV 对创伤性事件的定义。研究结果对使用自评量表评估 PTSD 具有启示意义。

相似文献

1
The importance of the DSM-IV E and F criteria in self-report assessments of PTSD.DSM-IV E 和 F 标准在 PTSD 自评评估中的重要性。
J Anxiety Disord. 2010 Jan;24(1):161-6. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.10.004.
2
The impact of changing diagnostic criteria in posttraumatic stress disorder in a Canadian epidemiologic sample.改变创伤后应激障碍诊断标准对加拿大流行病学样本的影响。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Aug;72(8):1034-41. doi: 10.4088/JCP.09m05700. Epub 2011 May 31.
3
Did the DSM-5 Improve the Traumatic Stressor Criterion?: Association of DSM-IV and DSM-5 Criterion A with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms.DSM-5 是否改善了创伤性应激源标准?:DSM-IV 和 DSM-5 标准 A 与创伤后应激障碍症状的关联。
Psychopathology. 2017;50(6):373-378. doi: 10.1159/000481950. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
4
Pediatric emergency department assessment of psychological trauma and posttraumatic stress.儿科急诊科对心理创伤和创伤后应激的评估
Psychiatr Serv. 2003 Sep;54(9):1277-81. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.54.9.1277.
5
[Evaluation of Post-traumatic Stress Disorder: validation of a measure, the PCLS].[创伤后应激障碍的评估:一种测量工具——创伤后应激障碍检查表(PCLS)的效度验证]
Encephale. 2003 May-Jun;29(3 Pt 1):232-8.
6
The Bosnian version of the international self-report measure of posttraumatic stress disorder, the Posttraumatic Stress Diagnostic Scale, is reliable and valid in a variety of different adult samples affected by war.波斯尼亚语版的创伤后应激障碍国际自我报告测量工具——创伤后应激诊断量表,在受战争影响的各种不同成年样本中是可靠且有效的。
BMC Psychiatry. 2005 Feb 23;5:11. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-5-11.
7
Reaction to stressful life events: what predicts symptom severity?对生活应激事件的反应:哪些因素可预测症状严重程度?
J Anxiety Disord. 2010 Aug;24(6):645-9. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.04.008. Epub 2010 Apr 22.
8
An evaluation of ICD-11 posttraumatic stress disorder criteria in two samples of adolescents and young adults exposed to mass shootings: factor analysis and comparisons to ICD-10 and DSM-IV.对遭受大规模枪击事件的青少年和青年两个样本中ICD - 11创伤后应激障碍标准的评估:因素分析以及与ICD - 10和DSM - IV的比较
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 May 12;16:140. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0849-y.
9
A comparison of the capacity of DSM-IV and DSM-5 acute stress disorder definitions to predict posttraumatic stress disorder and related disorders.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)与第五版(DSM-5)急性应激障碍定义对创伤后应激障碍及相关障碍预测能力的比较
J Clin Psychiatry. 2015 Apr;76(4):391-7. doi: 10.4088/JCP.13m08731.
10
Posttraumatic stress disorder in adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: clinical features and familial transmission.成人注意缺陷多动障碍中的创伤后应激障碍:临床特征和家族传递。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2013 Mar;74(3):e197-204. doi: 10.4088/JCP.12m07698.

引用本文的文献

1
Posttraumatic stress disorder prevalence and childbirth: update meta-analysis after the introduction of the DSM-5 and COVID-19 pandemic.创伤后应激障碍患病率与分娩:DSM-5 引入和 COVID-19 大流行后的更新荟萃分析。
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2024 Jun;27(3):337-357. doi: 10.1007/s00737-024-01423-7. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
2
COVID-19-associated impact and post-traumatic stress symptoms 39 days after pandemic in a sample of home-quarantined Chinese college students: the mediating effecting of past stressful events, psychological resilience, and social support.COVID-19 相关影响和大流行后 39 天被隔离在家的中国大学生创伤后应激症状:过去压力事件、心理弹性和社会支持的中介作用。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 May 30;23(1):379. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04906-6.
3
Work-related posttraumatic stress disorder in paramedics in comparison to data from the general population of working age. A systematic review and meta-analysis.工作相关创伤后应激障碍在急救人员与工作年龄的一般人群中的比较。系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 9;11:1151248. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1151248. eCollection 2023.
4
Effect of cyclooxygenase‑2 inhibition on the development of post‑traumatic stress disorder in rats.环氧化酶-2 抑制对大鼠创伤后应激障碍发展的影响。
Mol Med Rep. 2018 Apr;17(4):4925-4932. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2018.8525. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
5
Impact of Sedation on Cognitive Function in Mechanically Ventilated Patients.镇静对机械通气患者认知功能的影响。
Lung. 2016 Feb;194(1):43-52. doi: 10.1007/s00408-015-9820-9. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
6
Elucidating posttraumatic stress symptom profiles and their correlates among women experiencing bidirectional intimate partner violence.阐明遭受双向亲密伴侣暴力的女性的创伤后应激症状概况及其相关因素。
J Clin Psychol. 2014 Oct;70(10):1008-21. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22100. Epub 2014 Apr 19.