Suppr超能文献

一些市售和实验性根尖充填材料的射线不透性评估。

Evaluation of the radiopacity of some commercial and experimental root-end filling materials.

作者信息

Vivan Rodrigo R, Ordinola-Zapata Ronald, Bramante Clóvis M, Bernardineli Norberti, Garcia Roberto B, Hungaro Duarte Marco Antonio, de Moraes Ivaldo Gomes

机构信息

Department of Operative Dentistry, Dental Materials and Endodontics, Dental School of Bauru, University of São Paulo, Bauru, Brazil.

出版信息

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Dec;108(6):e35-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.07.037.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the radiopacity of 5 root end filling materials (white MTA Angelus, MTA Bio, light-cured MTA, Sealepox RP, and Portland cement clinker with bismuth oxide and calcium sulfate).

METHOD

Five specimens, 10 mm in diameter and 1 mm in thickness according to specification ISO 6876:2001 were fabricated from each material and radiographed using Insigth occlusal films close to a graduated aluminum step-wedge (2 to 16 mm in thickness). Radiographs were digitized and compared to the aluminum step-wedge. The radiographic density data were converted into millimeters of aluminum (mm Al), using the Digora 1.51 software. Results were evaluated statistically using the analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey test. The level of significance was set at 5% (P <.05%).

RESULTS

Radiopacity values ranged from 1.21 mm Al (light-cured MTA) to 6.45 mm Al (MTA Angelus). Comparison between materials showed significant difference (P < .05) between MTA Angelus and all other materials, between Sealepox RP and MTA Bio, and between light-cured MTA and Portland cement clinker. Light-cured MTA was significantly less radiopaque than all other materials. No significant difference (P > .05) was found between MTA Bio and Portland cement clinker.

CONCLUSIONS

All retrograde filling materials evaluated showed greater radiopacity than dentin. All the materials, except light-cured MTA met the minimum radiopacity standards of 3 mm Al recognized by the ISO 6876:2001 and ADA n.57.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估5种根尖充填材料(白色天使us MTA、MTA生物材料、光固化MTA、Sealepox RP以及含氧化铋和硫酸钙的波特兰水泥熟料)的射线不透性。

方法

根据ISO 6876∶2001标准,用每种材料制作5个直径10 mm、厚度1 mm的样本,使用靠近厚度为2至16 mm的带刻度铝阶梯楔的Insigth咬合片进行射线照相。将射线照片数字化,并与铝阶梯楔进行比较。使用Digora 1.51软件将射线照相密度数据转换为铝毫米数(mm Al)。结果采用方差分析(ANOVA)及后续的Tukey检验进行统计学评估。显著性水平设定为5%(P <.05%)。

结果

射线不透性值范围为1.21 mm Al(光固化MTA)至6.45 mm Al(天使us MTA)。材料之间的比较显示,天使us MTA与所有其他材料之间、Sealepox RP与MTA生物材料之间以及光固化MTA与波特兰水泥熟料之间存在显著差异(P <.05)。光固化MTA的射线不透性明显低于所有其他材料。MTA生物材料与波特兰水泥熟料之间未发现显著差异(P >.05)。

结论

所有评估的倒充填材料的射线不透性均高于牙本质。除光固化MTA外,所有材料均符合ISO 6876∶2001和ADA n.57认可的3 mm Al的最低射线不透性标准。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验