• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高自发药物不良反应报告的随访率:英国一个区域中心使用针对性信函的效果。

Improving follow-up rates in spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting: effectiveness of a targeted letter used by a regional centre in the UK.

机构信息

West Midlands Centre for Adverse Drug Reactions, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

Drug Saf. 2009;32(12):1135-40. doi: 10.2165/11318940-000000000-00000.

DOI:10.2165/11318940-000000000-00000
PMID:19916580
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Spontaneous reports of suspected adverse drug reactions to regulatory bodies and market authorization holders are important in pharmacovigilance. Follow-up information, which can be difficult to obtain, is often required from reporters; therefore, we developed targeted follow-up letters that we hoped would make replying easier.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effects of introducing targeted letters on responses to follow-up requests from a regional pharmacovigilance centre in the UK.

METHOD

In January 2001 we redesigned our follow-up request letter to include tick-boxes targeted to obtain the appropriate information from reporters. Response rates and the requirement for a second follow-up letter were examined for the 5-year period before introduction of the targeted follow-up letter (1996-2000) and the 5 years after the change to the targeted follow-up system (2001-5). In an 18-month sub-study examining data from 2001-2, time from the production of the first targeted follow-up letter to receipt of a response from reporters was also measured.

RESULTS

The introduction of targeted follow-up letters was associated with an increase in the mean annual response rate for follow-up from 36.4% in the 5 years pre-targeted follow-up to 60.5% in the 5 years post-targeted follow-up (p < 0.0001). Fifty percent of all successful follow-up responses were obtained within 70 days.

CONCLUSION

Targeted follow-up letters were associated with increased follow-up success rates. Results also indicate that closing cases to follow-up information at 70 days would allow collection of 78% of all follow-up that would ever arrive.

摘要

背景

向监管机构和市场授权持有人自发报告疑似药物不良反应对于药物警戒十分重要。通常需要向报告者索取随访信息,但这可能较为困难;因此,我们开发了有针对性的随访信函,希望这能使回复工作变得更容易。

目的

考察在英国一个区域药物警戒中心引入有针对性的随访信函对回复随访请求的效果。

方法

2001 年 1 月,我们重新设计了随访请求信函,纳入了旨在从报告者处获取适当信息的复选框。考察了引入有针对性的随访信函前 5 年(1996-2000 年)和变更为有针对性的随访系统后 5 年(2001-2005 年)的回复率和需要第二封随访信函的情况。在一个考察 2001-2002 年数据的 18 个月亚研究中,还测量了从第一封有针对性的随访信函发出到收到报告者回复的时间。

结果

引入有针对性的随访信函后,随访的平均年度回复率从有针对性随访前 5 年的 36.4%增加到有针对性随访后 5 年的 60.5%(p < 0.0001)。所有成功随访回复中有 50%是在 70 天内获得的。

结论

有针对性的随访信函与随访成功率的提高有关。结果还表明,在 70 天截止收集随访信息,将能获取所有可能到达的随访信息的 78%。

相似文献

1
Improving follow-up rates in spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting: effectiveness of a targeted letter used by a regional centre in the UK.提高自发药物不良反应报告的随访率:英国一个区域中心使用针对性信函的效果。
Drug Saf. 2009;32(12):1135-40. doi: 10.2165/11318940-000000000-00000.
2
Evaluation of patient reporting of adverse drug reactions to the UK 'Yellow Card Scheme': literature review, descriptive and qualitative analyses, and questionnaire surveys.评估患者向英国“黄卡计划”报告药物不良反应的情况:文献回顾、描述性和定性分析以及问卷调查。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 May;15(20):1-234, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta15200.
3
Does spontaneous adverse drug reactions' reporting differ between different reporters? A study in Toulouse Pharmacovigilance Centre.不同报告者自发不良反应报告是否存在差异?图卢兹药物警戒中心的一项研究。
Therapie. 2019 Oct;74(5):521-525. doi: 10.1016/j.therap.2019.01.008. Epub 2019 Mar 31.
4
How to promote adverse drug reaction reports using information systems - a systematic review and meta-analysis.如何利用信息系统促进药品不良反应报告——一项系统评价与荟萃分析
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Mar 1;16:27. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0265-8.
5
Adverse Drug Reaction Reports Received Through the Mobile App, VigiBIP: A Comparison with Classical Methods of Reporting.通过移动应用程序 VigiBIP 收到的药物不良反应报告:与传统报告方法的比较。
Drug Saf. 2018 May;41(5):511-514. doi: 10.1007/s40264-017-0630-2.
6
Completeness of Spontaneous Adverse Drug Reaction Reports Sent by General Practitioners to a Regional Pharmacovigilance Centre: A Descriptive Study.全科医生向地区药物警戒中心发送的自发药品不良反应报告的完整性:一项描述性研究。
Drug Saf. 2016 Dec;39(12):1189-1195. doi: 10.1007/s40264-016-0463-4.
7
Quantity is not enough: completeness of suspected adverse drug reaction reports in Spain-differences between regional pharmacovigilance centres and pharmaceutical industry.数量不够:西班牙可疑药物不良反应报告的完整性-地区药物警戒中心和制药行业之间的差异。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Aug;76(8):1175-1181. doi: 10.1007/s00228-020-02894-0. Epub 2020 May 23.
8
Patients' Perspectives on Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting in a Developing Country: A Case Study from Ghana.发展中国家患者对药品不良反应报告的看法:来自加纳的案例研究
Drug Saf. 2017 Oct;40(10):911-921. doi: 10.1007/s40264-017-0563-9.
9
Feedback for patients reporting adverse drug reactions; satisfaction and expectations.针对报告药物不良反应患者的反馈;满意度与期望。
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2015 May;14(5):625-32. doi: 10.1517/14740338.2015.1021775. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
10
Bulgarian Experience with Adverse Drug Reaction Reports from Patients and Consumers - Retrospective Data-base Study.保加利亚患者和消费者药品不良反应报告的经验——回顾性数据库研究
Folia Med (Plovdiv). 2018 Sep 1;60(3):447-453. doi: 10.2478/folmed-2018-0016.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of Knowledge, Attitude and Barriers towards Pharmacovigilance among Physicians and Pharmacists of Abbottabad, Pakistan.巴基斯坦阿伯塔巴德医生和药剂师对药物警戒的知识、态度及障碍评估
Pharmacy (Basel). 2018 Mar 31;6(2):29. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy6020029.
2
Strategies to improve adverse drug reaction reporting: a critical and systematic review.提高药物不良反应报告策略:批判性和系统性评价。
Drug Saf. 2013 May;36(5):317-28. doi: 10.1007/s40264-013-0058-2.
3
Adverse drug reactions: analysis of spontaneous reporting system in Europe in 2007-2009.

本文引用的文献

1
Expectations of general practitioners and specialist doctors regarding the feedback received after reporting an adverse drug reaction.全科医生和专科医生对报告药品不良反应后所收到反馈的期望。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008 Jan;17(1):76-81. doi: 10.1002/pds.1516.
2
Gold standards in pharmacovigilance: the use of definitive anecdotal reports of adverse drug reactions as pure gold and high-grade ore.药物警戒的金标准:将药物不良反应的确切轶事性报告用作纯金和高品位矿石。
Drug Saf. 2007;30(8):645-55. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200730080-00001.
3
Patient reporting of suspected adverse drug reactions: a review of published literature and international experience.
药物不良反应:2007-2009 年欧洲自发报告系统分析。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Jul;68(7):1057-63. doi: 10.1007/s00228-012-1219-4. Epub 2012 Feb 1.
4
Expectations for feedback in adverse drug reporting by healthcare professionals in the Netherlands.荷兰医疗保健专业人员在药物不良反应报告中的反馈期望。
Drug Saf. 2012 Mar 1;35(3):221-32. doi: 10.2165/11594910-000000000-00000.
患者对疑似药物不良反应的报告:已发表文献及国际经验综述
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007 Feb;63(2):148-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2006.02746.x.
4
The nature of the scientific evidence leading to drug withdrawals for pharmacovigilance reasons in France.在法国,因药物警戒原因导致药物撤市的科学证据的性质。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2006 Nov;15(11):808-12. doi: 10.1002/pds.1248.
5
An assessment of the publicly disseminated evidence of safety used in decisions to withdraw medicinal products from the UK and US markets.对用于决定从英国和美国市场撤回药品的公开传播的安全性证据的评估。
Drug Saf. 2006;29(2):175-81. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200629020-00008.
6
Use of proportional reporting ratios (PRRs) for signal generation from spontaneous adverse drug reaction reports.使用比例报告比(PRR)从自发药物不良反应报告中生成信号。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2001 Oct-Nov;10(6):483-6. doi: 10.1002/pds.677.
7
The use of evidence in pharmacovigilance. Case reports as the reference source for drug withdrawals.药物警戒中证据的使用。病例报告作为撤药的参考来源。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2001 Apr;57(1):89-91. doi: 10.1007/s002280100265.
8
Underreporting of suspected adverse drug reactions to newly marketed ("black triangle") drugs in general practice: observational study.全科医疗中对新上市(“黑三角”)药物疑似药物不良反应报告不足的情况:观察性研究。
BMJ. 1998 Jul 11;317(7151):119-20. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7151.119.
9
Attitudinal survey of adverse drug reaction reporting by medical practitioners in the United Kingdom.英国执业医师药品不良反应报告态度调查
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1995 Mar;39(3):223-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1995.tb04440.x.