• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全科医生和专科医生对报告药品不良反应后所收到反馈的期望。

Expectations of general practitioners and specialist doctors regarding the feedback received after reporting an adverse drug reaction.

作者信息

Cornelissen Lotte, van Puijenbroek Eugène, van Grootheest Kees

机构信息

Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, Goudsbloemvallei 7, s-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008 Jan;17(1):76-81. doi: 10.1002/pds.1516.

DOI:10.1002/pds.1516
PMID:17987591
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Aim of this study is to gain insight in experiences and expectations of general practitioners and specialist doctors regarding the feedback information of the Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb.

METHOD

A questionnaire survey was conducted among a random sample of 400 doctors, divided in general practitioners and specialist doctors. Within these groups, a difference was made between those who reported only once and those who are frequent reporters. A structured questionnaire consisted of 23 questions about expectations, experiences, the influence of feedback information and what the doctors would like to change in the feedback from Lareb. A comparison between the groups will give insight in what they think separately and how Lareb can seize on their wishes.

KEY FINDINGS

The response rate was 54.4% (n = 217) after one reminder. The respondents are satisfied with the feedback information and regarded the information of good quality. The expectations were higher on information about sources (significance 0.00, caused by specialist doctors who reported once) and co-medication (0.025 caused by all groups). The experiences of the four groups were also very positive. They all find the feedback information of Lareb reliable, scientifically well considered and to the point.

CONCLUSIONS

General practitioners and specialist doctors are satisfied about the follow-up information and they like to see the same format of information and communication in the future.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在深入了解全科医生和专科医生对荷兰药品警戒中心Lareb反馈信息的体验和期望。

方法

对400名医生的随机样本进行问卷调查,这些医生分为全科医生和专科医生。在这些组中,区分了仅报告过一次的医生和经常报告的医生。一份结构化问卷包含23个问题,涉及期望、体验、反馈信息的影响以及医生希望Lareb反馈做出哪些改变。组间比较将有助于了解他们各自的想法以及Lareb如何满足他们的愿望。

主要发现

在一次提醒后,回复率为54.4%(n = 217)。受访者对反馈信息感到满意,并认为信息质量良好。对来源信息(显著性为0.00,由仅报告过一次的专科医生引起)和联合用药信息(由所有组引起,显著性为0.025)的期望更高。这四组的体验也非常积极。他们都认为Lareb的反馈信息可靠、经过科学充分考量且切中要点。

结论

全科医生和专科医生对后续信息感到满意,并且希望在未来看到相同格式的信息和沟通方式。

相似文献

1
Expectations of general practitioners and specialist doctors regarding the feedback received after reporting an adverse drug reaction.全科医生和专科医生对报告药品不良反应后所收到反馈的期望。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008 Jan;17(1):76-81. doi: 10.1002/pds.1516.
2
Adverse drug reaction reporting by general medical practitioners and retail pharmacists in Harare--a pilot study.哈拉雷全科医生和零售药剂师的药品不良反应报告——一项试点研究。
Cent Afr J Med. 1998 Aug;44(8):190-5.
3
Expectations for feedback in adverse drug reporting by healthcare professionals in the Netherlands.荷兰医疗保健专业人员在药物不良反应报告中的反馈期望。
Drug Saf. 2012 Mar 1;35(3):221-32. doi: 10.2165/11594910-000000000-00000.
4
[Reasons to report or not report side effects of drugs to the national monitoring system in the Netherlands].[关于是否向荷兰国家监测系统报告药物副作用的原因]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1995 Nov 11;139(45):2306-8.
5
[Specialists without qualification. An interview study among general practitioners].[无资质的专科医生。全科医生访谈研究]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1992 Apr 10;112(10):1317-9.
6
Physicians' opinions and experiences of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Reform.医生对药品福利改革的看法和经验。
Scand J Public Health. 2006;34(6):654-9. doi: 10.1080/14034940600551111.
7
Contribution of pharmacists to the reporting of adverse drug reactions.药剂师在药品不良反应报告中的作用。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2002 Apr-May;11(3):205-10. doi: 10.1002/pds.702.
8
[Pharmacovigilance seen by a selected group of general practitioners and of residents in the Midi-Pyrénées region].[法国南部-比利牛斯大区部分全科医生及住院医师眼中的药物警戒]
Therapie. 1995 Sep-Oct;50(5):459-62.
9
[Special medical care in the opinion of general practitioners].全科医生眼中的特殊医疗护理
Wiad Lek. 2002;55 Suppl 1:296-300.
10
Communication between general practitioners and chiropractors.全科医生与脊椎按摩师之间的沟通。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2001 Jan;24(1):12-6. doi: 10.1067/mmt.2001.112016.

引用本文的文献

1
Expectations for feedback in adverse drug reporting by healthcare professionals in the Netherlands.荷兰医疗保健专业人员在药物不良反应报告中的反馈期望。
Drug Saf. 2012 Mar 1;35(3):221-32. doi: 10.2165/11594910-000000000-00000.
2
Educational sessions in pharmacovigilance: What do the doctors think?药物警戒教育课程:医生们怎么看?
BMC Res Notes. 2010 Nov 17;3:311. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-3-311.
3
Improving follow-up rates in spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting: effectiveness of a targeted letter used by a regional centre in the UK.
提高自发药物不良反应报告的随访率:英国一个区域中心使用针对性信函的效果。
Drug Saf. 2009;32(12):1135-40. doi: 10.2165/11318940-000000000-00000.
4
Information and feedback to improve occupational physicians' reporting of occupational diseases: a randomised controlled trial.信息和反馈以改进职业医生报告职业病的情况:一项随机对照试验。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2010 Apr;83(4):381-8. doi: 10.1007/s00420-009-0468-8. Epub 2009 Oct 15.
5
Current awareness: pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety.当前动态:药物流行病学与药物安全
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008 Jun;17(6):i-xvi. doi: 10.1002/pds.1487.