Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
J Rheumatol. 2009 Dec;36(12):2795-801. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.090432. Epub 2009 Nov 16.
The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) tender point (TP) criterion is used in diagnosing fibromyalgia syndrome (FM). There has been little research investigating patterns of positive TP. We investigated response patterns of TP in a sample of patients with FM.
Manual TP survey data were available on 1433 patients with FM. Factor analysis was conducted on ACR TP and control (CON) points. Factor scores were cluster analyzed to identify subgroups based on TP scores. Subgroups were compared on demographic and psychosocial variables.
Factor analysis resulted in 4 TP groupings: neck/shoulder girdle, gluteal/trochanteric, and upper extremity regions, and a set of CON TP. Cluster analysis revealed 3 clusters. Group 1 was high on all 3 TP regions and the CON set; Group 2 moderate on the 3 TP regions, low on the CON set; and Group 3 was relatively low on all 3 TP regions and the CON set. The group highest on the CON and TP regions reported the greatest pain (7.58 +/- 1.23; p < 0.001), sleep disturbance (7.05 +/- 1.61; p < 0.001), anxiety (10.14 +/- 4.57; p < 0.001), and depression (8.42 +/- 4.4; p < 0.001).
TP severity ratings varied among cluster groups, suggesting patients with FM are not homogeneous. Variations in TP severity provide information regarding the degree to which FM affects patients' quality of life. Patients with elevated scores on the CON TP demonstrated a general pattern reflecting lower thresholds for symptom reporting and, perhaps, disease severity. Research is needed to elucidate mechanisms underlying heterogeneity among the FM population.
美国风湿病学会(ACR)的压痛(TP)标准用于诊断纤维肌痛综合征(FM)。对于TP 阳性的模式研究甚少。我们对 FM 患者样本中 TP 的反应模式进行了研究。
1433 例 FM 患者的手动 TP 调查数据可用。对 ACR TP 和对照(CON)点进行因子分析。根据 TP 评分对因子得分进行聚类分析,以确定基于 TP 评分的亚组。比较亚组的人口统计学和社会心理变量。
因子分析产生了 4 个 TP 分组:颈部/肩部带、臀肌/转子区和上肢区,以及一组 CON TP。聚类分析显示了 3 个聚类。第 1 组在 3 个 TP 区域和 CON 组上均较高;第 2 组在 3 个 TP 区域上中等,在 CON 组上较低;第 3 组在所有 3 个 TP 区域和 CON 组上相对较低。在 CON 和 TP 区域得分最高的组报告了最大的疼痛(7.58 +/- 1.23;p < 0.001)、睡眠障碍(7.05 +/- 1.61;p < 0.001)、焦虑(10.14 +/- 4.57;p < 0.001)和抑郁(8.42 +/- 4.4;p < 0.001)。
各聚类组的 TP 严重程度评分存在差异,提示 FM 患者并非同质。TP 严重程度的变化提供了有关 FM 对患者生活质量影响程度的信息。CON TP 评分升高的患者表现出反映出症状报告和疾病严重程度较低的一般模式。需要研究来阐明 FM 人群中异质性的机制。