Suppr超能文献

低收入女性群体中贝克抑郁量表第二版的因子结构

The Beck Depression Inventory II factor structure among low-income women.

作者信息

Kneipp Shawn M, Kairalla John A, Stacciarini Jeanne, Pereira Deidre

机构信息

Department of Healthcare Environments and Systems, College of Nursing, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.

出版信息

Nurs Res. 2009 Nov-Dec;58(6):400-9. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e3181bee5aa.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) is considered a gold standard for identifying depression in adults. Validity of the BDI-II has been documented in diverse populations using exploratory factor analysis (EFA), although no findings have been reported exclusively among lower income women. Among EFA findings, the factor structure of the BDI-II has been inconsistent, with cognitive, affective, and somatic domains emerging differentially within factors across studies. This, in conjunction with concerns around the confounding of depressive symptoms as measured by the BDI-II and other illness states, has led researchers to examine more complex factor structures using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the factor structure of the BDI-II using both EFA and CFA among low-income women.

METHODS

After EFA with Promax rotation, CFA testing was conducted on several structural models with two randomly split subsamples of 108 and 200 women going through a Welfare Transition Program.

RESULTS

A two-factor structure was indicated by EFA, with the cognitive and affective domains represented in Factor 1 and somatic items comprising Factor 2. CFA revealed a general factor model, with General Depression and residual Cognitive and Somatic factors, best fit to the data on the basis of several indices (root mean square error of approximation = 0.05; standardized root mean square residual = 0.05; weighted root mean square residual = 0.69; comparative fit index = .98; and Tucker-Lewis index = .99) and model difference tests of significance (four comparisons: all chi values >24.9, all p values < .001).

DISCUSSION

Measurement using BDI-II is best represented by a complex factor structure among low-income women and is consistent with findings in other populations. Additional consideration for how a general model factor structure provides potentially new directions for depression measurement may advance science in several areas.

摘要

背景

贝克抑郁量表第二版(BDI-II)被视为识别成年人抑郁症的金标准。尽管尚未有专门针对低收入女性群体的研究结果报道,但通过探索性因素分析(EFA)已证明BDI-II在不同人群中具有有效性。在EFA的研究结果中,BDI-II的因素结构并不一致,在不同研究中,认知、情感和躯体领域在各因素中的呈现方式有所不同。再加上对BDI-II所测量的抑郁症状与其他疾病状态混淆的担忧,促使研究人员使用验证性因素分析(CFA)来检验更复杂的因素结构。

目的

本研究旨在通过EFA和CFA评估低收入女性群体中BDI-II的因素结构。

方法

在使用普罗麦克斯旋转法进行EFA之后,对两个分别包含108名和200名参与福利过渡项目女性的随机拆分子样本,就几个结构模型进行了CFA测试。

结果

EFA表明存在一个双因素结构,其中因素1包含认知和情感领域,因素2包含躯体项目。CFA揭示了一个一般因素模型,即一般抑郁因素以及残余的认知和躯体因素,基于几个指标(近似均方根误差=0.05;标准化均方根残差=0.05;加权均方根残差=0.69;比较拟合指数=.98;塔克-刘易斯指数=.99)以及模型差异显著性检验(四项比较:所有卡方值>24.9,所有p值<.001),该模型与数据拟合度最佳。

讨论

在低收入女性群体中,使用BDI-II进行测量的最佳方式是采用复杂的因素结构,这与其他人群的研究结果一致。对于一般模型因素结构如何为抑郁测量提供潜在新方向的进一步思考,可能会在多个领域推动科学发展。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验