• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗癫痫药物随机试验中的安慰剂反应。

Placebo responses in randomized trials of antiepileptic drugs.

机构信息

Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Russian State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.

出版信息

Epilepsy Behav. 2010 Jan;17(1):64-9. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2009.10.007. Epub 2009 Nov 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.yebeh.2009.10.007
PMID:19919904
Abstract

This meta-analysis of published, randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) of antiepileptic drugs in adults with focal drug-resistant epilepsy was performed to estimate a mean placebo effect, to evaluate variability in placebo response rates, to investigate associations between placebo effect rates and study characteristics, and to determine whether there were changes in placebo response rates over recent years in RCTs (so-called "placebo drift"). One hundred ninety-eight potentially appropriate studies were identified after MEDLINE search and carefully reviewed. Twenty-seven RCTs (with 5662 randomized patients, including 1887 patients in placebo arms) were included in the meta-analysis. A random effects meta-analytic model estimated the pooled placebo response at 12.5% (95% CI: 10.03-14.94%). A statistically significant correlation between baseline median seizure frequency and placebo response rates was not observed. "Placebo drift" was not considered statistically significant.

摘要

本研究对已发表的成人局灶性耐药性癫痫的抗癫痫药物随机对照试验(RCT)进行了荟萃分析,旨在估计平均安慰剂效应,评估安慰剂反应率的变异性,研究安慰剂效应率与研究特征之间的关系,并确定近年来 RCT 中安慰剂反应率是否发生变化(所谓的“安慰剂漂移”)。在 MEDLINE 搜索后仔细审查,确定了 198 项潜在合适的研究。27 项 RCT(共 5662 名随机患者,包括 1887 名安慰剂组患者)纳入荟萃分析。随机效应荟萃分析模型估计, pooled placebo response 为 12.5%(95% CI:10.03-14.94%)。基线中位数发作频率与安慰剂反应率之间未观察到统计学上显著相关性。“安慰剂漂移”未被认为具有统计学意义。

相似文献

1
Placebo responses in randomized trials of antiepileptic drugs.抗癫痫药物随机试验中的安慰剂反应。
Epilepsy Behav. 2010 Jan;17(1):64-9. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2009.10.007. Epub 2009 Nov 17.
2
Dropout rates in placebo-controlled and active-control clinical trials of antipsychotic drugs: a meta-analysis.抗精神病药物安慰剂对照和活性对照临床试验中的脱落率:一项荟萃分析。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Dec;62(12):1305-12. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.12.1305.
3
The effect of pramipexole on mood and motivational symptoms in Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled studies.普拉克索对帕金森病患者情绪和动机症状的影响:安慰剂对照研究的荟萃分析。
Clin Ther. 2009 Jan;31(1):89-98. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.01.012.
4
Identifying baseline characteristics of placebo responders versus nonresponders in randomized double-blind trials of refractory partial-onset seizures.
Epileptic Disord. 2006 Mar;8(1):37-44.
5
Efficacy of levetiracetam: a review of three pivotal clinical trials.左乙拉西坦的疗效:三项关键临床试验的综述
Epilepsia. 2001;42 Suppl 4:31-5.
6
Placebo response and antidepressant clinical trial outcome.安慰剂反应与抗抑郁药物临床试验结果。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2003 Apr;191(4):211-8. doi: 10.1097/01.NMD.0000061144.16176.38.
7
Meta-analysis of placebo rates in major depressive disorder trials.重度抑郁症试验中安慰剂率的荟萃分析。
Ann Pharmacother. 2003 Dec;37(12):1891-9. doi: 10.1345/aph.1D172.
8
Riluzole for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)/motor neuron disease (MND).利鲁唑用于治疗肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)/运动神经元病(MND)。
Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord. 2003 Sep;4(3):191-206.
9
Efficacy of botulinum toxin type A for the prophylaxis of episodic migraine headaches: a meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.A型肉毒杆菌毒素预防发作性偏头痛的疗效:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验的荟萃分析。
Pharmacotherapy. 2009 Jul;29(7):784-91. doi: 10.1592/phco.29.7.784.
10
Placebo effects in oral triptan trials: the scientific and ethical rationale for continued use of placebo controls.口服曲坦类药物试验中的安慰剂效应:继续使用安慰剂对照的科学与伦理依据。
Cephalalgia. 2005 Feb;25(2):124-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2004.00817.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Levetiracetam add-on for drug-resistant focal epilepsy.左乙拉西坦添加治疗耐药性局灶性癫痫。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 30;6(6):CD001901. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001901.pub3.
2
Psycho-Neuro-Endocrine-Immunological Basis of the Placebo Effect: Potential Applications beyond Pain Therapy.心理神经内分泌免疫学的安慰剂效应基础:超越疼痛治疗的潜在应用。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Apr 11;23(8):4196. doi: 10.3390/ijms23084196.
3
A Phase 2 Randomized Controlled Trial of the Efficacy and Safety of Cannabidivarin as Add-on Therapy in Participants with Inadequately Controlled Focal Seizures.
大麻二酚作为附加治疗在局灶性癫痫发作控制不佳的参与者中的疗效和安全性的 2 期随机对照试验。
Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2021 Dec;6(6):528-536. doi: 10.1089/can.2020.0075. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
4
Lorcaserin therapy for severe epilepsy of childhood onset: A case series.氯卡色林治疗儿童期起病的严重癫痫:病例系列
Neurology. 2018 Oct 30;91(18):837-839. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006432. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
5
Not all that glitters is gold: A guide to the critical interpretation of drug trials in epilepsy.并非所有闪光的都是金子:癫痫药物试验批判性解读指南。
Epilepsia Open. 2016 Jul 27;1(1-2):9-21. doi: 10.1002/epi4.3. eCollection 2016 Sep.
6
Can Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison Methods Mitigate Placebo Response Differences Among Patient Populations in Adjunctive Trials of Brivaracetam and Levetiracetam?匹配调整间接比较方法能否减轻布瓦西坦和左乙拉西坦辅助治疗试验中患者人群间安慰剂反应的差异?
CNS Drugs. 2017 Oct;31(10):899-910. doi: 10.1007/s40263-017-0462-8.
7
Does accounting for seizure frequency variability increase clinical trial power?考虑癫痫发作频率的变异性是否会提高临床试验效能?
Epilepsy Res. 2017 Nov;137:145-151. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2017.07.013. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
8
Tolerability of new antiepileptic drugs: a network meta-analysis.新型抗癫痫药物的耐受性:一项网状荟萃分析。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Jul;73(7):811-817. doi: 10.1007/s00228-017-2245-z. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
9
A big data approach to the development of mixed-effects models for seizure count data.一种用于癫痫发作计数数据的混合效应模型开发的大数据方法。
Epilepsia. 2017 May;58(5):835-844. doi: 10.1111/epi.13727. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
10
Response to placebo in clinical epilepsy trials--Old ideas and new insights.临床癫痫试验中对安慰剂的反应——旧观念与新见解
Epilepsy Res. 2016 May;122:15-25. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 Feb 10.