Mbizvo Gashirai K, Chandrasekar Bharath, Nevitt Sarah J, Dixon Pete, Hutton Jane L, Marson Anthony G
The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Muir Maxwell Epilepsy Centre, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 30;6(6):CD001901. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001901.pub3.
Drug resistance is common in focal epilepsy. In this update, we summarised the current evidence regarding add-on levetiracetam in treating drug-resistant focal epilepsy. The original review was published in 2001 and last updated in 2012.
To evaluate the effectiveness of levetiracetam when used as an add-on treatment for people with drug-resistant focal epilepsy.
We searched the Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS Web, which includes the Cochrane Epilepsy Group Specialized Register and CENTRAL), MEDLINE Ovid, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) to November 2018. We contacted the manufacturers of levetiracetam and researchers in the field to seek any ongoing or unpublished trials.
Randomised, placebo-controlled trials of add-on levetiracetam treatment in people with drug-resistant focal epilepsy.
Two review authors independently selected trials for inclusion, assessed trials for bias, extracted data, and evaluated the overall certainty of the evidence. Outcomes investigated included 50% or greater reduction in focal seizure frequency (response), treatment withdrawal, adverse effects (including a specific analysis of changes in behaviour), cognitive effects, and quality of life (QoL). Primary analysis was intention-to-treat. We performed meta-analysis for all outcomes using a Mantel-Haenszel approach and calculated risk ratios (RR), with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for all estimates apart from adverse effects (99% CIs). We assessed heterogeneity using a Chi² test and the I² statistic.
This update included 14 trials (2455 participants), predominantly possessing low risks of bias. Participants were adults in 12 trials (2159 participants) and children in the remaining two (296 participants). The doses of levetiracetam tested were 500 mg/day to 4000 mg/day in adults, and 60 mg/kg/day in children. Treatment ranged from 12 to 24 weeks. When individual doses were examined, levetiracetam at either 500 mg/day or 4000 mg/day did not perform better than placebo for the 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency outcome (500 mg: RR 1.60, 95% CI 0.71 to 3.62; P = 0.26; 4000 mg: RR 1.64, 95% CI 0.59 to 4.57; P = 0.34). Levetiracetam was significantly better than placebo at all other individual doses (1000 mg to 3000 mg). RR was significantly in favour of levetiracetam compared to placebo when results were pooled across all doses (RR 2.37, 95% CI 2.02 to 2.78; 14 studies, 2455 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Dose-response analysis demonstrated that the odds of achieving response (50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency) were increased by nearly 40% (odds ratio (OR) 1.39, 95% CI 1.23 to 1.58) for each 1000 mg increase in dose of levetiracetam. There were important levels of heterogeneity across multiple comparisons. Participants were not significantly more likely to experience treatment withdrawal with levetiracetam than with placebo (pooled RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.40; 13 studies, 2428 participants; high-certainty evidence). Somnolence was the most common adverse effect, affecting 13% of participants, and it was significantly associated with levetiracetam compared to placebo (pooled RR 1.62, 99% CI 1.19 to 2.20; 13 studies, 2423 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Changes in behaviour were negligible in adults (1% affected; RR 1.79, 99% CI 0.59 to 5.41), but significant in children (23% affected; RR 1.90, 99% CI 1.16 to 3.11). Levetiracetam had a positive effect on some aspects of cognition and QoL in adults and worsened certain aspects of child behaviour.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this review update finds that in both adults and children with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, levetiracetam added on to usual care is more effective than placebo at reducing seizure frequency, it is unlikely to be stopped by patients, and it has minimal adverse effects outside of potential worsening behaviour in children. These findings are unchanged from the previous review update in 2012. This review update contributes two key additional findings: 1. a 500 mg daily dose of levetiracetam is no more effective than placebo at reducing seizures; and 2. the odds of response (50% reduction in seizure frequency) are increased by nearly 40% for each 1000 mg increase in dose of levetiracetam. It seems reasonable to continue the use of levetiracetam in both adults and children with drug-resistant focal epilepsy.
耐药性在局灶性癫痫中很常见。在本次更新中,我们总结了有关添加左乙拉西坦治疗耐药性局灶性癫痫的现有证据。原始综述发表于2001年,上次更新于2012年。
评估左乙拉西坦作为附加治疗用于耐药性局灶性癫痫患者的有效性。
我们检索了Cochrane研究注册库(CRS网络版,包括Cochrane癫痫小组专业注册库和CENTRAL)、MEDLINE Ovid、ClinicalTrials.gov以及世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台(ICTRP),检索截至2018年11月。我们联系了左乙拉西坦的制造商和该领域的研究人员,以查找任何正在进行或未发表的试验。
关于添加左乙拉西坦治疗耐药性局灶性癫痫患者的随机、安慰剂对照试验。
两位综述作者独立选择纳入试验,评估试验的偏倚风险,提取数据,并评估证据的总体确定性。所研究的结局包括局灶性癫痫发作频率降低50%或更多(缓解)、治疗中断、不良反应(包括对行为变化的具体分析)、认知影响和生活质量(QoL)。主要分析采用意向性分析。我们使用Mantel-Haenszel方法对所有结局进行荟萃分析,并计算风险比(RR),除不良反应外,所有估计值均给出95%置信区间(CI)(不良反应为99%CI)。我们使用卡方检验和I²统计量评估异质性。
本次更新纳入了14项试验(2455名参与者),这些试验大多偏倚风险较低。12项试验(2159名参与者)的参与者为成年人,其余两项试验(296名参与者)的参与者为儿童。在成人中测试的左乙拉西坦剂量为500毫克/天至4000毫克/天,在儿童中为60毫克/千克/天。治疗持续时间为12至24周。当检查个体剂量时,500毫克/天或4000毫克/天的左乙拉西坦在癫痫发作频率降低50%或更多的结局方面并不比安慰剂表现更好(500毫克:RR 1.60,95%CI 0.71至3.62;P = 0.26;4000毫克:RR 1.64,95%CI 0.59至4.57;P = 0.34)。在所有其他个体剂量(1000毫克至3000毫克)下,左乙拉西坦明显优于安慰剂。当汇总所有剂量的结果时,与安慰剂相比,RR明显有利于左乙拉西坦(RR 2.37,95%CI 2.02至2.78;14项研究,2455名参与者;中等确定性证据)。剂量反应分析表明,左乙拉西坦剂量每增加1000毫克,达到缓解(癫痫发作频率降低50%或更多)的几率增加近40%(优势比(OR)1.39,95%CI 1.23至1.58)。多次比较存在重要程度的异质性。与安慰剂相比,使用左乙拉西坦的参与者治疗中断的可能性没有显著增加(汇总RR 1.11,95%CI 0.89至1.40;13项研究,2428名参与者;高确定性证据)。嗜睡是最常见的不良反应,影响13%的参与者,与安慰剂相比,与左乙拉西坦显著相关(汇总RR 1.62,99%CI 1.19至2.20;13项研究,2423名参与者;中等确定性证据)。行为变化在成年人中可忽略不计(1%受影响;RR 1.79,99%CI 0.59至5.41),但在儿童中显著(23%受影响;RR 1.90,99%CI 1.16至3.11)。左乙拉西坦对成年人的某些认知和生活质量方面有积极影响,对儿童行为的某些方面有不良影响。
总体而言,本次综述更新发现,在耐药性局灶性癫痫的成人和儿童中,在常规治疗基础上添加左乙拉西坦在降低癫痫发作频率方面比安慰剂更有效,不太可能被患者停用,并且除了可能使儿童行为恶化外,不良反应最小。这些发现与2012年上次综述更新一致。本次综述更新还得出另外两个关键发现:1. 每日500毫克剂量的左乙拉西坦在减少癫痫发作方面并不比安慰剂更有效;2. 左乙拉西坦剂量每增加1000毫克,缓解(癫痫发作频率降低50%)的几率增加近40%。对于耐药性局灶性癫痫的成人和儿童,继续使用左乙拉西坦似乎是合理的。