Department of Experimental Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.
Int J Neurosci. 2009;119(10):1755-78. doi: 10.1080/00207450903170361.
Eye movements were investigated amongst participants who preferentially use an egocentric or an allocentric frame of reference during navigation through computer simulated tunnels. Performance was highly accurate even though the tunnel passages contained only sparse visual flow and no differences in homing accuracy between subjects using one or the other reference frame was observed. Analyses of eye-movements revealed that gaze was centered on the tunnel's visual centroid during straight segments. However, during turns mean gaze position was directed toward the outer wall. As the angle of turn increased, the prevalence of overall eye movements and the laterality of gaze were greater than during turns of lesser angle. Even though the strategy groups reacted based on distinct reference frames, comparable patterns of eye movements were revealed for both strategies. The data describe how information during navigation through sparse visual environments is selected and demonstrate that the preferential use of an egocentric or an allocentric frame of reference is independent of eye-movement patterns. Thus, a purely cognitive basis for individual differences in reference frame usage can be assumed.
在通过计算机模拟隧道进行导航时,研究了优先使用自我中心或客体中心参照系的参与者的眼球运动。即使隧道通道仅包含稀疏的视觉流,并且使用一种或另一种参照系的受试者在归巢准确性方面没有差异,参与者的表现仍然非常准确。眼球运动的分析表明,在直道段,注视点集中在隧道的视觉质心。然而,在转弯时,平均注视位置指向外侧壁。随着转弯角度的增加,整体眼球运动的出现频率和注视的偏侧性大于转弯角度较小的情况。即使策略组基于不同的参照系做出反应,两种策略也显示出相似的眼球运动模式。这些数据描述了在稀疏视觉环境中导航时信息是如何被选择的,并表明优先使用自我中心或客体中心参照系与眼球运动模式无关。因此,可以假设个体参照系使用差异的纯粹认知基础。