• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在澳大利亚荷斯坦弗里生奶牛中使用随机搜索变量选择进行基因组选择的准确性。

Accuracy of genomic selection using stochastic search variable selection in Australian Holstein Friesian dairy cattle.

作者信息

Verbyla Klara L, Hayes Ben J, Bowman Philip J, Goddard Michael E

机构信息

Biosciences Research Division, Department of Primary Industries Victoria, Bundoora, Australia.

出版信息

Genet Res (Camb). 2009 Oct;91(5):307-11. doi: 10.1017/S0016672309990243.

DOI:10.1017/S0016672309990243
PMID:19922694
Abstract

Genomic selection describes a selection strategy based on genomic breeding values predicted from dense single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data. Multiple methods have been proposed but the critical issue is how to decide whether an SNP should be included in the predictive set to estimate breeding values. One major disadvantage of the traditional Bayes B approach is its high computational demands caused by the changing dimensionality of the models. The use of stochastic search variable selection (SSVS) retains the same assumptions about the distribution of SNP effects as Bayes B, while maintaining constant dimensionality. When Bayesian SSVS was used to predict genomic breeding values for real dairy data over a range of traits it produced accuracies higher or equivalent to other genomic selection methods with significantly decreased computational and time demands than Bayes B.

摘要

基因组选择描述了一种基于从密集单核苷酸多态性(SNP)数据预测的基因组育种值的选择策略。已经提出了多种方法,但关键问题是如何决定一个SNP是否应包含在预测集中以估计育种值。传统贝叶斯B方法的一个主要缺点是其模型维度变化导致的高计算需求。随机搜索变量选择(SSVS)的使用保留了与贝叶斯B相同的关于SNP效应分布的假设,同时保持维度不变。当使用贝叶斯SSVS来预测一系列性状的真实奶牛数据的基因组育种值时,它产生的准确性高于或等同于其他基因组选择方法,且计算和时间需求比贝叶斯B显著降低。

相似文献

1
Accuracy of genomic selection using stochastic search variable selection in Australian Holstein Friesian dairy cattle.在澳大利亚荷斯坦弗里生奶牛中使用随机搜索变量选择进行基因组选择的准确性。
Genet Res (Camb). 2009 Oct;91(5):307-11. doi: 10.1017/S0016672309990243.
2
Improving accuracy of genomic predictions within and between dairy cattle breeds with imputed high-density single nucleotide polymorphism panels.利用高分辨率单核苷酸多态性面板提高奶牛品种内和品种间基因组预测的准确性。
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Jul;95(7):4114-29. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-5019.
3
A comparison of five methods to predict genomic breeding values of dairy bulls from genome-wide SNP markers.比较五种方法从全基因组 SNP 标记预测奶牛公牛的基因组育种值。
Genet Sel Evol. 2009 Dec 31;41(1):56. doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-41-56.
4
Genomic prediction of breeding values using previously estimated SNP variances.利用先前估计的单核苷酸多态性(SNP)方差进行育种值的基因组预测。
Genet Sel Evol. 2014 Sep 25;46(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12711-014-0052-x.
5
Application of Bayesian least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and BayesCπ methods for genomic selection in French Holstein and Montbéliarde breeds.贝叶斯最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)和 BayesCπ 方法在法国荷斯坦和蒙贝利亚德品种基因组选择中的应用。
J Dairy Sci. 2013 Jan;96(1):575-91. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-5225. Epub 2012 Nov 3.
6
Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges.特邀综述:奶牛的基因组选择:进展与挑战
J Dairy Sci. 2009 Feb;92(2):433-43. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1646.
7
The importance of haplotype length and heritability using genomic selection in dairy cattle.单倍型长度及遗传力在奶牛基因组选择中的重要性。
J Anim Breed Genet. 2009 Feb;126(1):3-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2008.00747.x.
8
Application of neural networks with back-propagation to genome-enabled prediction of complex traits in Holstein-Friesian and German Fleckvieh cattle.基于神经网络的反向传播算法在荷斯坦-弗里森牛和德国弗莱维赫牛基因组特征预测复杂性状中的应用。
Genet Sel Evol. 2015 Mar 31;47(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12711-015-0097-5.
9
A simple method for genomic selection of moderately sized dairy cattle populations.一种用于中大规模奶牛群体基因组选择的简单方法。
Animal. 2012 Feb;6(2):193-202. doi: 10.1017/S1751731111001704.
10
A computationally efficient algorithm for genomic prediction using a Bayesian model.一种使用贝叶斯模型进行基因组预测的计算高效算法。
Genet Sel Evol. 2015 Apr 30;47(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12711-014-0082-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Utilizing Variants Identified with Multiple Genome-Wide Association Study Methods Optimizes Genomic Selection for Growth Traits in Pigs.利用多种全基因组关联研究方法鉴定出的变异优化猪生长性状的基因组选择
Animals (Basel). 2023 Feb 17;13(4):722. doi: 10.3390/ani13040722.
2
Genetic prediction of complex traits with polygenic scores: a statistical review.基于多基因评分的复杂性状遗传预测:统计述评。
Trends Genet. 2021 Nov;37(11):995-1011. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2021.06.004. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
3
G2PDeep: a web-based deep-learning framework for quantitative phenotype prediction and discovery of genomic markers.
G2PDeep:一个基于网络的深度学习框架,用于定量表型预测和基因组标记的发现。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2021 Jul 2;49(W1):W228-W236. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab407.
4
Accuracies of Genomic Prediction for Growth Traits at Weaning and Yearling Ages in Yak.牦牛断奶和一岁龄时生长性状的基因组预测准确性
Animals (Basel). 2020 Oct 2;10(10):1793. doi: 10.3390/ani10101793.
5
Statistical methods for SNP heritability estimation and partition: A review.用于单核苷酸多态性(SNP)遗传力估计和划分的统计方法:综述
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2020 Jun 18;18:1557-1568. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2020.06.011. eCollection 2020.
6
Single-Step Methodology for Genomic Evaluation in Turkeys ().火鸡基因组评估的单步方法()。
Front Genet. 2019 Dec 20;10:1248. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.01248. eCollection 2019.
7
Phenotype Prediction and Genome-Wide Association Study Using Deep Convolutional Neural Network of Soybean.基于深度卷积神经网络的大豆表型预测与全基因组关联研究
Front Genet. 2019 Nov 22;10:1091. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.01091. eCollection 2019.
8
Polygenic prediction via Bayesian regression and continuous shrinkage priors.基于贝叶斯回归和连续收缩先验的多基因预测。
Nat Commun. 2019 Apr 16;10(1):1776. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09718-5.
9
Optimising the identification of causal variants across varying genetic architectures in crops.优化作物不同遗传结构中因果变异的识别。
Plant Biotechnol J. 2019 May;17(5):893-905. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13023. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
10
Non-additive Effects in Genomic Selection.基因组选择中的非加性效应。
Front Genet. 2018 Mar 6;9:78. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00078. eCollection 2018.