Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee 38163, USA.
J Surg Res. 2010 May 15;160(2):196-201. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2009.06.059. Epub 2009 Aug 21.
Lack of health insurance (NO-INS) is associated with increased long-term mortality after head and spinal cord injuries (NEURO-TRA). Less is known about the influence of insurance type and long-term mortality following non-NEURO-TRA. We hypothesized that NO-INS would be associated with 2-y mortality after moderate to severe injury.
Adults (>or=18) treated at a level-I trauma center following a moderate to severe blunt injury (ISS>15) and without NEURO-TRA from 2000-2005 and discharged alive were eligible for the study. Two-y mortality was determined utilizing the Social Security Administration Death Master File. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine if type of insurance [NO-INS, Private (PRIV-INS), Medicare/Medicaid; GOV-INS), or Other (OTH-INS)] was related to 2-y mortality.
One thousand nine hundred fifty-eight patients met study inclusion/exclusion criteria. Two-y risk of death was 2.96%. On univariate analysis, admission age, lactate, and insurance type were associated with 2-y mortality (P<0.25). However, race was not. After adjusting for admission age and lactate, compared with PRIV-INS, having either NO-INS or GOV-INS was significantly associated with increased 2-y mortality. The analysis was repeated without patients eligible for Medicare (Age>or=65), and GOV-INS was still associated with increased 2-y mortality (OR 4.47 P<0.05).
Following moderate to severe blunt, non-NEURO-TRA, having GOVT-INS or NO-INS was associated with increased 2-y mortality. The mechanism by which this association may be explained is unclear. Future research focused on elucidating mechanisms behind poor long-term outcomes should include an examination of socioeconomic status as a potential contributor to reduced long-term mortality after injury.
缺乏健康保险(无保险)与头部和脊髓损伤(神经创伤)后的长期死亡率增加有关。对于非神经创伤后保险类型和长期死亡率的影响知之甚少。我们假设无保险与中度至重度损伤后 2 年的死亡率有关。
在 2000-2005 年期间,从一个一级创伤中心接受治疗的成年人(> = 18 岁),患有中度至重度钝性损伤(ISS> 15)且无神经创伤,并且存活出院的患者符合研究条件。利用社会安全管理局死亡主文件确定 2 年死亡率。使用逻辑回归分析确定保险类型(无保险、私人(私人保险)、医疗保险/医疗补助;政府保险)或其他(其他保险)是否与 2 年死亡率相关。
1958 名患者符合研究纳入/排除标准。2 年死亡风险为 2.96%。在单变量分析中,入院年龄、乳酸和保险类型与 2 年死亡率相关(P<0.25)。然而,种族无关。在调整入院年龄和乳酸后,与私人保险相比,无保险或政府保险与增加的 2 年死亡率显著相关。在没有符合医疗保险资格的患者(年龄> = 65 岁)的情况下重复该分析,政府保险仍然与增加的 2 年死亡率相关(OR 4.47 P<0.05)。
在中度至重度非神经创伤后,拥有政府保险或无保险与增加的 2 年死亡率相关。这种关联的机制尚不清楚。未来的研究应集中在阐明导致受伤后长期预后不佳的机制,包括将社会经济地位作为降低长期死亡率的潜在因素进行检查。