Christensen T, Nilsen L T N
Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority, PO Box 55, NO-1332 Østerås, Norway.
J Radiol Prot. 2009 Dec;29(4):491-8. doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/29/4/003. Epub 2009 Nov 18.
A survey was undertaken regarding the extent to which optical radiation is used in cosmetic treatments and the compliance with national regulations. Questionnaires were sent to 65 clinics, and 23 of these were later inspected. Only one of 41 class 4 lasers had been reported to the authorities according to the regulations prior to the survey. Among sources other than lasers, intense pulsed light (IPL) sources were the most frequent. Although qualified health personnel should be in charge of the treatment, it was observed that 30% of the clinics did not fulfil this requirement. Deviations with respect to personnel training, availability of written procedures, protective equipment and warning signs were frequently observed. The results give rise to concern about the safety of patients and employees.
针对光辐射在美容治疗中的使用程度以及对国家法规的遵守情况进行了一项调查。向65家诊所发送了调查问卷,其中23家后来接受了检查。在调查之前,41台4类激光设备中只有一台按照规定向当局进行了报告。在激光以外的光源中,强脉冲光(IPL)光源最为常见。尽管应由合格的卫生人员负责治疗,但观察发现30%的诊所未满足这一要求。经常观察到在人员培训、书面程序的可用性、防护设备和警示标志方面存在偏差。这些结果引发了对患者和员工安全的担忧。