• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

常见双侧增强式练习垂直地面反作用力的量化研究。

Quantification of vertical ground reaction forces of popular bilateral plyometric exercises.

机构信息

Biodynamics Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology and Health Promotion, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Jan;24(1):207-12. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181c3b841.

DOI:10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181c3b841
PMID:19924006
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to quantify the vertical ground reaction forces (VGRFs) developed during the performance of popular bilateral plyometric movements. Fourteen power-oriented track and field men of collegiate and national level randomly performed 3 trials of 9 different bilateral plyometric exercises in a single testing session. Three depth drop (DD) and 3 depth jump (DJ) conditions from 30, 60, and 90 cm heights (DD30, DD60, and DD90 and DJ30, DJ60, and DJ90) were tested, in addition to vertical jump (VJ), standing long jump (SLJ), and 2 consecutive jump (2CJ) conditions. Peak impact VGRFs were normalized to body weight. Additionally, all conditions were compared against the VJ in an intensity index. The SLJ condition resulted in a significantly higher peak VGRF than the 2CJ condition (p < or = 0.05). 90DD, 90DJ, 60DD, and SLJ had a significantly greater peak VGRF (5.39, 4.93, 4.30, and 4.22 times body weight, respectively) than the VJ condition (3.34 times body weight). The 30DJ condition had an insignificantly smaller peak VGRF (2.78 times body weight) when compared with the VJ. Practitioners may use these findings to more effectively progress athletes in these movements based on their intensities.

摘要

本研究的目的是量化在进行流行的双侧弹震式运动时产生的垂直地面反作用力(VGRF)。14 名具有竞技和国家级水平的力量型田径运动员在单次测试中随机进行了 3 次 9 种不同的双侧弹震式练习。测试了 3 个深度下降(DD)和 3 个深度跳跃(DJ)条件,高度分别为 30、60 和 90 厘米(DD30、DD60 和 DD90 和 DJ30、DJ60 和 DJ90),此外还有垂直跳跃(VJ)、站立跳远(SLJ)和 2 连续跳跃(2CJ)条件。峰值冲击 VGRF 被归一化为体重。此外,所有条件都与 VJ 进行了强度指数比较。SLJ 条件的峰值 VGRF 明显高于 2CJ 条件(p<0.05)。90DD、90DJ、60DD 和 SLJ 的峰值 VGRF 明显高于 VJ 条件(分别为 5.39、4.93、4.30 和 4.22 倍体重)。与 VJ 相比,30DJ 条件的峰值 VGRF 较小(2.78 倍体重),但差异无统计学意义。从业者可以根据这些运动的强度更有效地让运动员在这些运动中取得进步。

相似文献

1
Quantification of vertical ground reaction forces of popular bilateral plyometric exercises.常见双侧增强式练习垂直地面反作用力的量化研究。
J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Jan;24(1):207-12. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181c3b841.
2
Impact kinetics associated with four common bilateral plyometric exercises.与四种常见双侧增强式练习相关的冲击动力学。
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2019 Apr;59(4):575-580. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.18.08359-7. Epub 2018 Apr 20.
3
Vertical jump biomechanics after plyometric, weight lifting, and combined (weight lifting + plyometric) training.跳躍生物力學在增強式訓練、重量訓練和綜合(重量訓練+增強式訓練)訓練後的表現。
J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Sep;24(9):2440-8. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181e274ab.
4
Females Decrease Vertical Ground Reaction Forces Following 4-Week Jump-Landing Feedback Intervention Without Negative Affect on Vertical Jump Performance.在进行为期4周的跳跃着陆反馈干预后,女性降低了垂直地面反作用力,且对垂直跳跃表现没有负面影响。
J Sport Rehabil. 2019 Nov 1;28(8):866-870. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2018-0140.
5
Intensity rankings of plyometric exercises using joint power absorption.使用关节功率吸收的增强式训练强度排名。
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2014 Sep;29(8):918-22. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.06.015. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
6
Periodized plyometric training is effective for women, and performance is not influenced by the length of post-training recovery.周期性增强式训练对女性有效,且训练后的恢复期长短并不影响其表现。
J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Jan;24(1):1-7. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181c49086.
7
Quantifying plyometric intensity via rate of force development, knee joint, and ground reaction forces.通过力量发展速率、膝关节和地面反作用力来量化增强式训练强度。
J Strength Cond Res. 2007 Aug;21(3):763-7. doi: 10.1519/R-18735.1.
8
Countermovement jump peak force relative to body weight and jump height as predictors for sprint running performances: (in)homogeneity of track and field athletes?反跳峰值力相对于体重和跳跃高度作为短跑运动表现的预测指标:田径运动员的(异)质性?
J Strength Cond Res. 2013 Apr;27(4):944-53. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318260edad.
9
The effect of plyometric training on power and kicking distance in female adolescent soccer players.增强式训练对女性青少年足球运动员力量和踢球距离的影响。
J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Jan;25(1):129-34. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b94a3d.
10
Factors Influencing Spike Jump Height in Female College Volleyball Players.影响女子高校排球运动员扣球高度的因素。
J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Jan;32(1):267-273. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002191.

引用本文的文献

1
Plyometric training increases thickness and volume of knee articular cartilage in mice.增强式训练可增加小鼠膝关节软骨的厚度和体积。
NPJ Microgravity. 2025 Feb 13;11(1):5. doi: 10.1038/s41526-025-00458-z.
2
Effects of Drop Jump Training on Physical Fitness in Highly Trained Young Male Volleyball Players: Comparing Maximal Rebound Height and Standard Drop Height Training.纵跳训练对高水平年轻男性排球运动员身体素质的影响:最大反弹高度与标准下落高度训练的比较
Sports (Basel). 2024 Dec 5;12(12):336. doi: 10.3390/sports12120336.
3
Kinetic variables of the lower limb joint that affect the drop jump index at different drop heights.
在不同下落高度下影响下落跳指数的下肢关节动力学变量。
Front Sports Act Living. 2024 Nov 19;6:1458722. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1458722. eCollection 2024.
4
A Comparison of the Plyometric Performance of Upper Limbs between Experienced and Non-Experienced Athletes.有经验和无经验运动员上肢增强式体能训练表现的比较。
Sports (Basel). 2024 Aug 12;12(8):217. doi: 10.3390/sports12080217.
5
Effect of vertical, horizontal, and combined plyometric training on jump, sprint and change of direction performance in male soccer players.垂直、水平和综合增强式训练对男性足球运动员跳跃、冲刺和变向能力的影响。
PLoS One. 2024 May 23;19(5):e0295786. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295786. eCollection 2024.
6
Spatiotemporal variables comparison between drop jump and horizontal drop jump in elite jumpers and sprinters.优秀跳跃运动员和短跑运动员在垂直跳和水平跳中的时空变量比较。
PeerJ. 2024 Feb 26;12:e17026. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17026. eCollection 2024.
7
Methodological considerations for determining the volume and intensity of drop jump training. A systematic, critical and prepositive review.确定跳深训练量和强度的方法学考量:一项系统、批判性和前瞻性综述。
Front Physiol. 2023 Apr 21;14:1181781. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1181781. eCollection 2023.
8
Validity and reliability of the Output sport device for assessing drop jump performance.用于评估纵跳性能的输出式运动设备的有效性和可靠性。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Oct 17;10:1015526. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1015526. eCollection 2022.
9
The Effect of Aquatic Plyometric Training on Jump Performance Including a Four-week Follow-up in Youth Female Volleyball Players.水上增强式训练对青年女排运动员跳跃成绩的影响,包括为期四周的随访
J Hum Kinet. 2022 Sep 8;83:197-205. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2022-0058. eCollection 2022 Aug.
10
The Validity of the Push Band 2.0 on the Reactive Strength Index Assessment in Drop Jump.《Push Band 2.0 在下落跳中反应强度指数评估中的有效性》
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jun 22;22(13):4724. doi: 10.3390/s22134724.