Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Canada.
Can J Aging. 2009 Dec;28(4):315-22. doi: 10.1017/S0714980809990225.
ABSTRACTIn the absence of a universally agreed-upon definition of successful aging, researchers increasingly look to older adults for layperson views of aging and definitions of successful aging. To use lay definitions in studies of aging, however, researchers must address the definitions' consistency. In 2004, surviving members of the Manitoba Follow-up Study male cohort (mean age: 83 years) were asked twice for their definition of successful aging. A consistency category was assigned based on the similarity of themes in each of 654 pairs of definitions. At least half of the main themes were similar in 70 per cent of the definition pairs; 80 per cent of respondents repeated at least one theme. Positive or negative health events in the four-week interval between definitions and specific respondents' characteristics did not vary across consistency categories. This evidence for consistency supports our continued reliance on lay definitions of successful aging.
由于目前还没有一个被普遍认可的成功老龄化定义,研究人员越来越多地向老年人征求他们对衰老的看法和成功老龄化的定义。然而,要在老龄化研究中使用这些通俗定义,研究人员必须解决其一致性问题。2004 年,曼尼托巴后续研究男性队列的在世成员(平均年龄:83 岁)被要求两次对成功老龄化的定义。根据 654 对定义中的主题相似性,为每个定义分配了一个一致性类别。在 70%的定义对中,至少有一半的主要主题是相似的;80%的受访者重复了至少一个主题。在定义之间的四周内发生的积极或消极的健康事件以及特定受访者的特征在一致性类别之间没有差异。这一一致性证据支持我们继续依赖于通俗的成功老龄化定义。