Centre for Research in Nursing and Midwifery Education, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Duke of Kent Building, Stag Hill, Guildford, Surrey GU2 5TE, United Kingdom.
Nurse Educ Today. 2010 Jul;30(5):476-9. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2009.10.011. Epub 2009 Nov 17.
This paper considers two questions: what pedagogies for teaching nursing are used in nurse education research? Are these pedagogies transferred to learning in the workplace? We argue that there are underpinning pedagogies identified in nurse education research in the area of workplace and work based learning which are broadly qualitative, action orientated and focused on knowledge generation. Such pedagogies are rooted in a philosophy of teaching and learning where learning is seen as active, reflective and socially constructed. We consider possible answers to these questions through an exploration of empirical work by Evans et al. (2009) which has focused on knowledge transfer in the workplace. Their work offers insights into how pedagogies can be applied to nurse education research which in turn may be transferred into the workplace. In particular, they argue that the concept of knowledge transfer is outdated and we should focus instead on how knowledge learnt in one context (the academy) is re-contextualised in another (the workplace). We also draw on Aranda and Law's (2007) paper on the debates concerning the use of sociology in nurse education to explore competing narratives. We conclude that the pedagogies identified in educational research are not transferred to nurse education and practice yet offer an alternative view of knowledge transfer as illustrated by Evans et al.'s work which explores how learning in the workplace may be facilitated more effectively. We conclude that the lack of transfer of nurse education research pedagogies to practice learning undermines the position of nurse teachers within the academy as nurse education becomes a practice or professional discipline without a discrete disciplinary base.
护理教育研究中使用了哪些教学方法?这些教学方法是否转移到了工作场所的学习中?我们认为,在工作场所和基于工作的学习领域的护理教育研究中,存在着一些潜在的教学方法,这些方法通常是定性的、行动导向的,并且注重知识的生成。这些教学方法植根于一种教学哲学,在这种哲学中,学习被视为主动的、反思性的和社会建构的。我们通过探索 Evans 等人(2009 年)的实证工作来考虑这些问题的可能答案,这些工作主要关注工作场所的知识转移。他们的工作为如何将教学法应用于护理教育研究提供了一些启示,而这些研究又可以转移到工作场所。特别是,他们认为知识转移的概念已经过时,我们应该转而关注如何将在一个情境(学院)中学到的知识重新应用于另一个情境(工作场所)。我们还借鉴了 Aranda 和 Law(2007 年)关于社会学在护理教育中应用的争论的论文,以探讨相互竞争的叙述。我们的结论是,教育研究中确定的教学方法并没有转移到护理教育和实践中,但提供了知识转移的另一种观点,正如 Evans 等人的工作所展示的,该工作探讨了如何更有效地促进工作场所的学习。我们的结论是,缺乏将护理教育研究教学法转移到实践学习中,削弱了护理教师在学院中的地位,因为护理教育成为一种实践或专业学科,而没有一个独立的学科基础。