• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索特定活动气质测试的益处。

Exploration of the benefits of an activity-specific test of temperament.

作者信息

Trofimova Irina N

机构信息

Collective Intelligence Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, McMaster University.

出版信息

Psychol Rep. 2009 Oct;105(2):643-58. doi: 10.2466/PR0.105.2.643-658.

DOI:10.2466/PR0.105.2.643-658
PMID:19928626
Abstract

The Structure of Temperament Questionnaire (STQ) was proposed by Rusalov in 1989 and subsequently tested in five languages. The questionnaire assesses four temperamental traits (Ergonicity, Plasticity, Tempo, and Emotionality) in three separate areas of activity: physical, verbal-social, and intellectual. The scales are all activity-specific. In 775 Canadian subjects, two temperament tests were compared, both developed on the basis of Pavlovian studies of the nervous system: the activity-specific approach (STQ) and the nonspecific Pavlovian Temperamental Survey (PTS). More significant sex differences were found on activity-specific scales of the STQ than on the nonspecific PTS scales. The pattern of correlations between the STQ scales and the time taken on an experimental task requiring a prolonged and intense word-assessment activity showed stronger correlations with the specific scales of the STQ measuring the dynamic aspects of social-verbal activity, and not with the PTS Strength of Excitation scale, which is based on a "general arousal" concept. The results supported the separation of temperament traits related to three different types of activities and opposed to "general arousal" theories of temperament.

摘要

气质问卷结构(STQ)由鲁萨洛夫于1989年提出,随后在五种语言中进行了测试。该问卷在身体、言语社交和智力三个不同的活动领域评估四种气质特征(精力、可塑性、节奏和情绪性)。这些量表都是针对特定活动的。在775名加拿大受试者中,比较了两种基于巴甫洛夫神经系统研究开发的气质测试:特定活动方法(STQ)和非特定的巴甫洛夫气质调查(PTS)。与非特定的PTS量表相比,在STQ的特定活动量表上发现了更显著的性别差异。STQ量表与一项需要长时间高强度单词评估活动的实验任务所花费时间之间的相关模式显示,与测量社交言语活动动态方面的STQ特定量表的相关性更强,而与基于“一般唤醒”概念的PTS兴奋强度量表的相关性不强。结果支持了与三种不同类型活动相关的气质特征的分离,并反对气质的“一般唤醒”理论。

相似文献

1
Exploration of the benefits of an activity-specific test of temperament.探索特定活动气质测试的益处。
Psychol Rep. 2009 Oct;105(2):643-58. doi: 10.2466/PR0.105.2.643-658.
2
An investigation into differences between the structure of temperament and the structure of personality.关于气质结构与人格结构差异的一项调查。
Am J Psychol. 2010 Winter;123(4):467-80.
3
Affective temperament traits measured by TEMPS-I and emotional-behavioral problems in clinically-well children, adolescents, and young adults.通过TEMPS-I测量的情感气质特征与临床健康的儿童、青少年及年轻人的情绪行为问题
J Affect Disord. 2005 Mar;85(1-2):169-80. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0327(03)00100-9.
4
The relationship of Kraepelian affective temperaments (as measured by TEMPS-I) to the tridimensional personality questionnaire (TPQ).克雷佩林式情感气质(通过TEMPS-I量表测量)与三维人格问卷(TPQ)之间的关系。
J Affect Disord. 2005 Mar;85(1-2):17-27. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0327(03)00099-5.
5
The factor structure of the Buss and Plomin EAS Temperament Survey (parental ratings) in a Dutch sample of elementary school children.荷兰小学生样本中布斯与普洛明气质调查表(父母评定)的因子结构。
J Pers Assess. 1994 Jun;62(3):537-51. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6203_13.
6
Factorial structure and internal consistency of the German TEMPS-A scale: validation against the NEO-FFI questionnaire.德文版TEMPS-A量表的因子结构与内部一致性:对照NEO-FFI问卷进行验证
J Affect Disord. 2005 Mar;85(1-2):77-83. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0327(03)00101-0.
7
Polish validation of the TEMPS-A: the profile of affective temperaments in a college student population.波兰文版 TEMPS-A 的验证:大学生群体的情感气质特征。
J Affect Disord. 2010 Jun;123(1-3):36-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2009.09.024. Epub 2009 Oct 31.
8
Reliability of informant ratings and spouse similarity based on the Temperament and Character Inventory.基于气质与性格量表的知情者评分及配偶相似性的可靠性
Psychol Rep. 2011 Aug;109(1):231-42. doi: 10.2466/02.09.PR0.109.4.231-242.
9
[Spanish adaptation of the EAS Temperament Survey for the assessment of child temperament].用于评估儿童气质的《EAS气质问卷》西班牙文改编版
Psicothema. 2011 Feb;23(1):160-6.
10
TEMPS-A: validation of a short version of a self-rated instrument designed to measure variations in temperament.TEMPS-A:一种旨在测量气质变化的自评工具简版的验证。
J Affect Disord. 2005 Mar;85(1-2):45-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2003.10.012.

引用本文的文献

1
Functional Constructivism Approach to Multilevel Nature of Bio-Behavioral Diversity.生物行为多样性多层次本质的功能建构主义方法
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Oct 27;12:641286. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.641286. eCollection 2021.
2
Diversity in action: exchange of perspectives and reflections on taxonomies of individual differences.多样性在行动:个体差异分类学的观点和反思交流。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Apr 19;373(1744). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0172.
3
Functionality versus dimensionality in psychological taxonomies, and a puzzle of emotional valence.
心理分类学中的功能性与维度性,以及情绪效价的难题。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Apr 19;373(1744). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0167.
4
Functional systems theory and the activity-specific approach in psychological taxonomies.功能系统理论与心理分类学中的活动特异性方法。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Apr 19;373(1744). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0166.
5
Observer bias: an interaction of temperament traits with biases in the semantic perception of lexical material.观察者偏见:气质特征与词汇语义感知偏差的相互作用。
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 27;9(1):e85677. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085677. eCollection 2014.