Trofimova Irina
McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Am J Psychol. 2010 Winter;123(4):467-80.
This article analyzes the differences between an activity-specific temperament model and the Big Five personality model using the Structure of Temperament Questionnaire--Compact (STQ-77). The STQ-77 has 3 emotionality scales and 9 scales assessing 3 dynamic aspects (arousal, lability, and sensory sensitivity) in 3 areas of activity (physical, verbal-social, and mental). The results of administration of the Russian STQ-77, NEO-FFI, and SSS-V to 174 Russian participants showed how components of temperament can represent the traits described in the Big Five model. The confirmatory factor analysis of the English STQ-77 and the results of a study involving a prolonged word classification task with 221 Canadian participants showed the benefits of the activity-specific approach, separating temperament traits in three areas of activity. Such specificity of temperament traits differentiates them from personality traits.
本文使用精简版气质问卷(STQ - 77)分析了特定活动气质模型与大五人格模型之间的差异。STQ - 77有3个情绪量表和9个量表,用于评估3个活动领域(身体、言语社交和心理)中的3个动态方面(唤醒、易变性和感觉敏感性)。对174名俄罗斯参与者进行俄罗斯版STQ - 77、NEO - FFI和SSS - V施测的结果表明,气质成分如何能够体现大五模型中所描述的特质。对英文STQ - 77的验证性因素分析以及一项涉及221名加拿大参与者的长时间单词分类任务的研究结果表明了特定活动方法的优势,即将气质特质在三个活动领域中区分开来。这种气质特质的特异性使其有别于人格特质。