Suppr超能文献

淋巴细胞亚群的参考范围。标准全血裂解技术与快速全血裂解技术的比较。

Reference ranges for lymphocyte subsets. A comparison of standard vs rapid whole-blood lysis techniques.

作者信息

Kotylo P K, Sample R B, Redmond N L, Hibner G C

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis.

出版信息

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1991 Feb;115(2):181-4.

PMID:1992988
Abstract

Reference ranges for lymphocyte subsets may vary with processing techniques, monoclonal reagents, or analytic methods. We compared reference ranges obtained for T- and B-lymphocyte subsets by means of standard manual whole-blood lysis with a wash step vs a rapid, no-wash whole-blood lysis system. Both techniques demonstrated reference ranges similar to those in previous literature reports. The ranges established with standard and rapid lysis were similar when antibodies directed to the same cluster designation were used. Although slight statistical differences in relative percentages of CD2 and CD3 lymphocytes were observed, these differences were probably not clinically significant. These data indicate that the rapid technique provides a standardized method for enumerating T and B lymphocytes in peripheral blood.

摘要

淋巴细胞亚群的参考范围可能因处理技术、单克隆试剂或分析方法的不同而有所差异。我们比较了通过标准手工全血裂解并进行洗涤步骤与快速、无洗涤全血裂解系统获得的T淋巴细胞和B淋巴细胞亚群的参考范围。两种技术所显示的参考范围均与先前文献报道的相似。当使用针对相同分化群的抗体时,标准裂解和快速裂解所确定的范围相似。尽管观察到CD2和CD3淋巴细胞相对百分比存在轻微的统计学差异,但这些差异可能不具有临床意义。这些数据表明,快速技术为外周血中T淋巴细胞和B淋巴细胞的计数提供了一种标准化方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验